Robotic Multivisceral Resection (RMVR) of the Pelvis for Locally Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma: Single Oncosurgical Center Experience.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791561
M A Chamila Lakmal, Chelliah R Selvasekar, Shyam Aggarwal, Soumitra Rawat
{"title":"Robotic Multivisceral Resection (RMVR) of the Pelvis for Locally Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma: Single Oncosurgical Center Experience.","authors":"M A Chamila Lakmal, Chelliah R Selvasekar, Shyam Aggarwal, Soumitra Rawat","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Locally advanced colorectal cancer management remains a challenge due to multiple reasons. Some of the major ones include the changes following the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and systemic anticancer treatment and previous abdominal surgery (including defunctioning stoma and related changes) and the proximity of structures close to the cancer. Robotic colorectal surgery for malignancy is rapidly evolving as a surgical technique in the management of colorectal cancers but its role in the management of locally advanced disease is not defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of robotic colorectal surgery performed and captured in a prospective database. Patients who underwent multivisceral robotic colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2022 were included in this study. Robotic colorectal surgeries without multivisceral resections were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients underwent robotic multivisceral resection (RMVR). This included 6 males and 17 females. The 17 females underwent posterior clearance, 5 males underwent abdominoperineal resection with seminal vesicle excision, and 1 male underwent total pelvic exenteration. Of the patients, 22 had neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. Sixteen (66.7%) had past lower abdominal surgery (stoma). Preoperative tumor staging was T3 or T4 in 90%, and 80% had R0 resection. The median lymph node harvest was 15 (range 4-31). There was zero need for conversion to open surgery and zero 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RMVR is a safe approach for locally advanced colorectal cancer, with acceptable surgical clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"13 4","pages":"259-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Locally advanced colorectal cancer management remains a challenge due to multiple reasons. Some of the major ones include the changes following the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and systemic anticancer treatment and previous abdominal surgery (including defunctioning stoma and related changes) and the proximity of structures close to the cancer. Robotic colorectal surgery for malignancy is rapidly evolving as a surgical technique in the management of colorectal cancers but its role in the management of locally advanced disease is not defined.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of robotic colorectal surgery performed and captured in a prospective database. Patients who underwent multivisceral robotic colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2022 were included in this study. Robotic colorectal surgeries without multivisceral resections were excluded.

Results: A total of 24 patients underwent robotic multivisceral resection (RMVR). This included 6 males and 17 females. The 17 females underwent posterior clearance, 5 males underwent abdominoperineal resection with seminal vesicle excision, and 1 male underwent total pelvic exenteration. Of the patients, 22 had neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. Sixteen (66.7%) had past lower abdominal surgery (stoma). Preoperative tumor staging was T3 or T4 in 90%, and 80% had R0 resection. The median lymph node harvest was 15 (range 4-31). There was zero need for conversion to open surgery and zero 90-day mortality.

Conclusion: RMVR is a safe approach for locally advanced colorectal cancer, with acceptable surgical clearance.

机器人骨盆多脏器切除(RMVR)治疗局部晚期结直肠癌:单一肿瘤外科中心经验。
由于多种原因,局部晚期结直肠癌的治疗仍然是一个挑战。其中一些主要的变化包括使用新辅助放疗和全身抗癌治疗以及以前的腹部手术后的变化(包括功能性造口和相关变化)以及靠近癌症的结构的邻近性。恶性肿瘤的机器人结直肠癌手术作为结直肠癌治疗的一种外科技术正在迅速发展,但其在局部晚期疾病治疗中的作用尚未明确。方法:这是一个回顾性分析的机器人结肠直肠手术,并在前瞻性数据库中捕获。2012年至2022年期间接受多内脏机器人结肠直肠手术的患者纳入本研究。排除无多脏器切除的机器人结肠直肠手术。结果:共有24例患者接受了机器人多脏器切除(RMVR)。其中包括6名男性和17名女性。17例女性行后路清除率,5例男性行腹会阴切除伴精囊切除,1例男性行全盆腔切除。22例患者行新辅助盆腔放疗。16例(66.7%)曾做过下腹部造口手术。术前肿瘤分期为T3或T4的占90%,R0切除的占80%。中位淋巴结切除15(范围4-31)。无需转开手术,90天死亡率为零。结论:RMVR是治疗局部晚期结直肠癌的安全方法,手术清除率可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信