A Bayesian framework for safety signal detection from medical device data.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jianjin Xu, Adrijo Chakraborty, Archie Sachdeva, Ram Tiwari
{"title":"A Bayesian framework for safety signal detection from medical device data.","authors":"Jianjin Xu, Adrijo Chakraborty, Archie Sachdeva, Ram Tiwari","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2025.2464595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety evaluation is important during both the pre-market clinical trials and post-market surveillance. In either a pre-market or post-market setting wherein the safety of a device is compared to that of a control device, it is desirable to identify any difference in the safety between two devices as expeditiously as possible. Here, we introduce the Bayesian hierarchical framework for the safety assessment in two-arm clinical trials, with signal detection accomplished by evaluating the effect size of each adverse event (AE) measured by odds ratio or relative risk. The framework starts with a standard hierarchical Bayesian model with a parametric distribution as a common prior for the effect sizes of all AEs. Then, it is extended with a non-parametric prior, Dirichlet Process Prior, to allow for more flexibility. After that, to account for the rare events in some trials, it is further extended with the option of additional zero-inflated parameters and calculation of regularized effect size. Extra incorporation of exposure-time information is available under each framework. The performance of the proposed technique, along with its extensions, is studied by simulation. The application of the proposed Bayesian framework is demonstrated by data from a two-device clinical trial, the newer left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the existing LVAD. The Bayesian analysis result is then compared to a traditional frequentist technique. Through both simulation and application, the proposed Bayesian technique is shown to be robust to the selection of priors of the variance component, and has comparative and under some scenarios even better performance than the frequentist technique. Overall, the developed Bayesian framework is a feasible alternative to the frequentist method for safety evaluation of medical device clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2464595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety evaluation is important during both the pre-market clinical trials and post-market surveillance. In either a pre-market or post-market setting wherein the safety of a device is compared to that of a control device, it is desirable to identify any difference in the safety between two devices as expeditiously as possible. Here, we introduce the Bayesian hierarchical framework for the safety assessment in two-arm clinical trials, with signal detection accomplished by evaluating the effect size of each adverse event (AE) measured by odds ratio or relative risk. The framework starts with a standard hierarchical Bayesian model with a parametric distribution as a common prior for the effect sizes of all AEs. Then, it is extended with a non-parametric prior, Dirichlet Process Prior, to allow for more flexibility. After that, to account for the rare events in some trials, it is further extended with the option of additional zero-inflated parameters and calculation of regularized effect size. Extra incorporation of exposure-time information is available under each framework. The performance of the proposed technique, along with its extensions, is studied by simulation. The application of the proposed Bayesian framework is demonstrated by data from a two-device clinical trial, the newer left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the existing LVAD. The Bayesian analysis result is then compared to a traditional frequentist technique. Through both simulation and application, the proposed Bayesian technique is shown to be robust to the selection of priors of the variance component, and has comparative and under some scenarios even better performance than the frequentist technique. Overall, the developed Bayesian framework is a feasible alternative to the frequentist method for safety evaluation of medical device clinical trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers: Drug, device, and biological research and development; Drug screening and drug design; Assessment of pharmacological activity; Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up; Preclinical safety assessment; Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics; Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs; Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety; Postmarketing surveillance; Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信