Points to consider for revising the ICH S7A guideline on safety and secondary pharmacology

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Jean-Pierre Valentin , Derek Leishman
{"title":"Points to consider for revising the ICH S7A guideline on safety and secondary pharmacology","authors":"Jean-Pierre Valentin ,&nbsp;Derek Leishman","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the ICH S7A guideline on safety pharmacology largely achieved its objective, a proportion of remaining adverse drug reactions and attrition can be attributed in part to gaps in safety and secondary pharmacology assessments. Advances in science, technology, drug development paradigm and regulatory practices necessitate revisiting and evolving ICH S7A to address these limitations. The anticipated completion of the ICH S7B Q&amp;As by end of 2025 provides an opportunity to integrate its outcomes with ICH S7A into a comprehensive, modality-agnostic sustainable over time framework. Such consolidation could streamline guidance, enhance usability, and align regulatory expectations globally. This proposed revision should aim to address key aspects of safety and secondary pharmacology, including the definition of adversity, the integration of human-relevant <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in silico</em> models, and the adoption of state-of-the-art <em>in vivo</em> platforms. Further considerations should include the development of principles for model and assay validation, the promotion of integrated risk assessment frameworks, and incorporation of weight of evidence approaches. Revised guideline would also emphasize sustainable practices by adapting to evolving therapeutic modalities, while reducing reliance on animal testing through New Approach Methodologies. The revision seeks to enhance the benefit-risk evaluation of drug candidates, refine clinical monitoring, foster regulatory acceptance, and streamline drug development. This comprehensive update has the potential to not only optimize drug safety evaluations but also to align industry practices with modern scientific advancements and ethical considerations, ensuring a more robust and efficient pathway for therapeutic innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027323002500025X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the ICH S7A guideline on safety pharmacology largely achieved its objective, a proportion of remaining adverse drug reactions and attrition can be attributed in part to gaps in safety and secondary pharmacology assessments. Advances in science, technology, drug development paradigm and regulatory practices necessitate revisiting and evolving ICH S7A to address these limitations. The anticipated completion of the ICH S7B Q&As by end of 2025 provides an opportunity to integrate its outcomes with ICH S7A into a comprehensive, modality-agnostic sustainable over time framework. Such consolidation could streamline guidance, enhance usability, and align regulatory expectations globally. This proposed revision should aim to address key aspects of safety and secondary pharmacology, including the definition of adversity, the integration of human-relevant in vitro and in silico models, and the adoption of state-of-the-art in vivo platforms. Further considerations should include the development of principles for model and assay validation, the promotion of integrated risk assessment frameworks, and incorporation of weight of evidence approaches. Revised guideline would also emphasize sustainable practices by adapting to evolving therapeutic modalities, while reducing reliance on animal testing through New Approach Methodologies. The revision seeks to enhance the benefit-risk evaluation of drug candidates, refine clinical monitoring, foster regulatory acceptance, and streamline drug development. This comprehensive update has the potential to not only optimize drug safety evaluations but also to align industry practices with modern scientific advancements and ethical considerations, ensuring a more robust and efficient pathway for therapeutic innovation.
修订 ICH S7A 安全性和辅助药理学指南的要点。
尽管ICH S7A安全药理学指南在很大程度上实现了其目标,但仍有一部分药物不良反应和损耗可部分归因于安全性和二次药理学评估方面的差距。科学、技术、药物开发范式和监管实践的进步需要重新审视和发展ICH S7A以解决这些限制。预计到2025年底完成的ICH S7B问答将提供一个机会,将其结果与ICH S7A整合到一个全面的、与模式无关的可持续的时间框架中。这种整合可以简化指导,提高可用性,并在全球范围内调整监管预期。该修订建议旨在解决安全性和二级药理学的关键方面,包括逆境的定义,与人类相关的体外和计算机模型的整合,以及最先进的体内平台的采用。进一步的考虑应包括制定模型和分析验证原则,促进综合风险评估框架,并纳入证据权重方法。修订后的指南还将强调可持续实践,适应不断发展的治疗方式,同时通过新方法方法减少对动物试验的依赖。该修订旨在加强候选药物的获益-风险评估,完善临床监测,促进监管接受,并简化药物开发。这一全面更新不仅有可能优化药物安全性评估,而且有可能使行业实践与现代科学进步和伦理考虑保持一致,确保为治疗创新提供更强大和有效的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信