Failure to rescue in acute liver failure: A multicenter cohort study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liver Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1097/LVT.0000000000000594
Filipe S Cardoso, William M Lee, Constantine J Karvellas
{"title":"Failure to rescue in acute liver failure: A multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Filipe S Cardoso, William M Lee, Constantine J Karvellas","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of failure to rescue has been used to measure the quality of care for complications developed following surgery. The concept of failure to rescue has been poorly studied in patients with primary medical diseases, such as sepsis or acute liver failure (ALF). We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including consecutive patients with ALF within the United States ALF Study Group (USALFSG) prospective registry from 2010-2016. The failure to rescue rate for 12 medical complications in the registry was calculated as the mortality events up to 21 days after inclusion divided by the complication events registered on the first day after inclusion. The association between these complications and 21-day transplant-free mortality was studied. Among 665 patients with ALF, 478 (71.9%) were females, and the median (IQR) age was 42 (30-55) years. Acetaminophen intoxication was observed in 322 (48.4%) patients. Overall, 461 (69.3%) patients had at least one medical complication on the first day after inclusion (median [IQR] number of 1 [0-3]). The failure to rescue rate for the 12 complications was 32.8%. The complications with the higher failure-to-rescue rates were gastrointestinal bleed (63.6%), non-gastrointestinal bleed (53.9%), requirement for vasopressors (52.5%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (48.1%). After adjusting for age, sex, etiology, and international normalized ratio, per each added complication present on day 1, the odds of 21-day transplant-free mortality increased by 38% (adjusted OR [95% CI] of 1.38 [1.24-1.54]; c-statistic [95% CI] of 0.77 [0.73-0.81]). In patients with ALF, the concept of failure to rescue highlights the need to improve prevention, early detection, and timely management of medical complications developing early in the hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"982-988"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of failure to rescue has been used to measure the quality of care for complications developed following surgery. The concept of failure to rescue has been poorly studied in patients with primary medical diseases, such as sepsis or acute liver failure (ALF). We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including consecutive patients with ALF within the United States ALF Study Group (USALFSG) prospective registry from 2010-2016. The failure to rescue rate for 12 medical complications in the registry was calculated as the mortality events up to 21 days after inclusion divided by the complication events registered on the first day after inclusion. The association between these complications and 21-day transplant-free mortality was studied. Among 665 patients with ALF, 478 (71.9%) were females, and the median (IQR) age was 42 (30-55) years. Acetaminophen intoxication was observed in 322 (48.4%) patients. Overall, 461 (69.3%) patients had at least one medical complication on the first day after inclusion (median [IQR] number of 1 [0-3]). The failure to rescue rate for the 12 complications was 32.8%. The complications with the higher failure-to-rescue rates were gastrointestinal bleed (63.6%), non-gastrointestinal bleed (53.9%), requirement for vasopressors (52.5%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (48.1%). After adjusting for age, sex, etiology, and international normalized ratio, per each added complication present on day 1, the odds of 21-day transplant-free mortality increased by 38% (adjusted OR [95% CI] of 1.38 [1.24-1.54]; c-statistic [95% CI] of 0.77 [0.73-0.81]). In patients with ALF, the concept of failure to rescue highlights the need to improve prevention, early detection, and timely management of medical complications developing early in the hospital stay.

急性肝衰竭抢救失败:一项多中心队列研究。
引言:抢救失败的概念已经被用来衡量手术后并发症的护理质量。对于原发性内科疾病(如败血症或急性肝衰竭)患者抢救失败的概念研究甚少。方法:回顾性多中心队列,包括2010年至2016年美国ALF研究组(USALFSG)前瞻性登记的连续ALF患者。登记中12种医疗并发症的抢救失败率计算为纳入后21天的死亡事件除以纳入后第一天登记的并发症事件。研究了这些并发症与21天无移植死亡率之间的关系。结果:665例ALF患者中,女性478例(71.9%),中位(IQR)年龄42岁(30-55岁)。对乙酰氨基酚中毒322例(48.4%)。总体而言,461例(69.3%)患者在纳入后第一天至少有一种医学并发症(IQR中位数为1(0-3))。12例并发症抢救失败率为32.8%。抢救失败率较高的并发症为胃肠道出血(63.6%)、非胃肠道出血(53.9%)、血管加压药需求(52.5%)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(48.1%)。在调整了年龄、性别、病因和INR后,每增加第一天出现的并发症,21天无移植死亡的几率增加38% (aOR (95%CI)为1.38 (1.24-1.54);c-statistic (95%CI)为0.77(0.73-0.81)。结论:在ALF患者中,抢救失败的概念强调了需要改进预防、早期发现和及时处理住院早期发生的医疗并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信