Incidence and predictors of transurethral resection of prostate in men with and without type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Timothy M E Davis, Wendy A Davis
{"title":"Incidence and predictors of transurethral resection of prostate in men with and without type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I.","authors":"Timothy M E Davis, Wendy A Davis","doi":"10.1111/imj.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between type 2 diabetes and the incidence of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To utilise data from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) to examine the association between type 2 diabetes and incident TURP and investigate risk factors in men with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First TURP hospitalisations were ascertained for males from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (n = 581) and age- and postcode-matched men without diabetes (n = 2361) between entry (1993-1996) and end (2017). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models generated cause-specific (cs) and subdistribution (sd) hazard ratios (HRs) for incident TURP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 86 and 338 TURP hospitalisations in participants with and without type 2 diabetes, respectively, during 42 236 person-years of follow-up. The IRR (95% confidence interval) for diabetes versus no diabetes was 1.23 (0.96, 1.56). A 10-year age increase more than doubled the risk of incident TURP (csHR 2.51 (2.02, 3.12), sdHR 2.59 (2.11, 3.18)), but type 2 diabetes was not a significant predictor in multivariable models. In participants with type 2 diabetes, a 10-year age increase was predictive (csHR 2.94 (1.93, 4.47), sdHR 1.92 (1.51, 2.44)); Anglo-Celt versus other ethnic groups was significant in the Cox (csHR 1.87 (1.17, 3.00)) but not competing risk (sdHR 1.60 (0.99, 2.57)) models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type 2 diabetes does not increase TURP risk in community-based Australians. There are no diabetes-specific variables associated with incident TURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between type 2 diabetes and the incidence of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains uncertain.

Aims: To utilise data from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) to examine the association between type 2 diabetes and incident TURP and investigate risk factors in men with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: First TURP hospitalisations were ascertained for males from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (n = 581) and age- and postcode-matched men without diabetes (n = 2361) between entry (1993-1996) and end (2017). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models generated cause-specific (cs) and subdistribution (sd) hazard ratios (HRs) for incident TURP.

Results: There were 86 and 338 TURP hospitalisations in participants with and without type 2 diabetes, respectively, during 42 236 person-years of follow-up. The IRR (95% confidence interval) for diabetes versus no diabetes was 1.23 (0.96, 1.56). A 10-year age increase more than doubled the risk of incident TURP (csHR 2.51 (2.02, 3.12), sdHR 2.59 (2.11, 3.18)), but type 2 diabetes was not a significant predictor in multivariable models. In participants with type 2 diabetes, a 10-year age increase was predictive (csHR 2.94 (1.93, 4.47), sdHR 1.92 (1.51, 2.44)); Anglo-Celt versus other ethnic groups was significant in the Cox (csHR 1.87 (1.17, 3.00)) but not competing risk (sdHR 1.60 (0.99, 2.57)) models.

Conclusions: Type 2 diabetes does not increase TURP risk in community-based Australians. There are no diabetes-specific variables associated with incident TURP.

Fremantle糖尿病研究I期:伴有和不伴有2型糖尿病的男性经尿道前列腺切除术的发生率和预测因素
背景:2型糖尿病与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)发生率之间的关系尚不确定。目的:利用Fremantle糖尿病研究I期(FDS1)的数据来检查2型糖尿病与TURP事件之间的关系,并调查2型糖尿病男性患者的危险因素。方法:在入组(1993-1996年)至结束(2017年)期间,确定弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究I期男性(n = 581)和年龄和邮政编码匹配的无糖尿病男性(n = 2361)的首次TURP住院。计算发病率比(IRRs)。Cox比例风险和竞争风险模型生成了事故TURP的原因特异性(cs)和亚分布(sd)风险比(hr)。结果:在42 236人年的随访期间,有2型糖尿病和无2型糖尿病的参与者分别有86例和338例TURP住院。糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的IRR(95%可信区间)为1.23(0.96,1.56)。年龄增加10岁发生TURP的风险增加一倍以上(csHR 2.51 (2.02, 3.12), sdHR 2.59(2.11, 3.18)),但在多变量模型中,2型糖尿病不是一个显著的预测因子。在2型糖尿病患者中,年龄增加10岁具有预测性(csHR 2.94 (1.93, 4.47), sdHR 1.92 (1.51, 2.44));在Cox模型中,盎格鲁-凯尔特人与其他族裔相比存在显著差异(csHR 1.87(1.17, 3.00)),但不存在竞争风险(sdHR 1.60(0.99, 2.57))。结论:2型糖尿病不会增加以社区为基础的澳大利亚人的TURP风险。没有与TURP事件相关的糖尿病特异性变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信