Shantanu Jain, Marena Trinidad, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Kaiya Jones, Santiago Diaz Neto, Fang Ge, Ailin Glagovsky, Cameron Jones, Giankaleb Moran, Boqi Wang, Kobra Rahimi, Sümeyra Zeynep Çalıcı, Luis R Cedillo, Silvia Berardelli, Buse Özden, Ken Chen, Panagiotis Katsonis, Amanda Williams, Olivier Lichtarge, Sadhna Rana, Swatantra Pradhan, Rajgopal Srinivasan, Rakshanda Sajeed, Dinesh Joshi, Eshel Faraggi, Robert Jernigan, Andrzej Kloczkowski, Jierui Xu, Zigang Song, Selen Özkan, Natàlia Padilla, Xavier de la Cruz, Rocio Acuna-Hidalgo, Andrea Grafmüller, Laura T Jiménez Barrón, Matteo Manfredi, Castrense Savojardo, Giulia Babbi, Pier Luigi Martelli, Rita Casadio, Yuanfei Sun, Shaowen Zhu, Yang Shen, Fabrizio Pucci, Marianne Rooman, Gabriel Cia, Daniele Raimondi, Pauline Hermans, Sofia Kwee, Ella Chen, Courtney Astore, Akash Kamandula, Vikas Pejaver, Rashika Ramola, Michelle Velyunskiy, Daniel Zeiberg, Reet Mishra, Teague Sterling, Jennifer L Goldstein, Jose Lugo-Martinez, Sufyan Kazi, Sindy Li, Kinsey Long, Steven E Brenner, Constantina Bakolitsa, Predrag Radivojac, Dean Suhr, Teryn Suhr, Wyatt T Clark
{"title":"Evaluation of enzyme activity predictions for variants of unknown significance in Arylsulfatase A.","authors":"Shantanu Jain, Marena Trinidad, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Kaiya Jones, Santiago Diaz Neto, Fang Ge, Ailin Glagovsky, Cameron Jones, Giankaleb Moran, Boqi Wang, Kobra Rahimi, Sümeyra Zeynep Çalıcı, Luis R Cedillo, Silvia Berardelli, Buse Özden, Ken Chen, Panagiotis Katsonis, Amanda Williams, Olivier Lichtarge, Sadhna Rana, Swatantra Pradhan, Rajgopal Srinivasan, Rakshanda Sajeed, Dinesh Joshi, Eshel Faraggi, Robert Jernigan, Andrzej Kloczkowski, Jierui Xu, Zigang Song, Selen Özkan, Natàlia Padilla, Xavier de la Cruz, Rocio Acuna-Hidalgo, Andrea Grafmüller, Laura T Jiménez Barrón, Matteo Manfredi, Castrense Savojardo, Giulia Babbi, Pier Luigi Martelli, Rita Casadio, Yuanfei Sun, Shaowen Zhu, Yang Shen, Fabrizio Pucci, Marianne Rooman, Gabriel Cia, Daniele Raimondi, Pauline Hermans, Sofia Kwee, Ella Chen, Courtney Astore, Akash Kamandula, Vikas Pejaver, Rashika Ramola, Michelle Velyunskiy, Daniel Zeiberg, Reet Mishra, Teague Sterling, Jennifer L Goldstein, Jose Lugo-Martinez, Sufyan Kazi, Sindy Li, Kinsey Long, Steven E Brenner, Constantina Bakolitsa, Predrag Radivojac, Dean Suhr, Teryn Suhr, Wyatt T Clark","doi":"10.1007/s00439-025-02731-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continued advances in variant effect prediction are necessary to demonstrate the ability of machine learning methods to accurately determine the clinical impact of variants of unknown significance (VUS). Towards this goal, the ARSA Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenge was designed to characterize progress by utilizing 219 experimentally assayed missense VUS in the Arylsulfatase A (ARSA) gene to assess the performance of community-submitted predictions of variant functional effects. The challenge involved 15 teams, and evaluated additional predictions from established and recently released models. Notably, a model developed by participants of a genetics and coding bootcamp, trained with standard machine-learning tools in Python, demonstrated superior performance among submissions. Furthermore, the study observed that state-of-the-art deep learning methods provided small but statistically significant improvement in predictive performance compared to less elaborate techniques. These findings underscore the utility of variant effect prediction, and the potential for models trained with modest resources to accurately classify VUS in genetic and clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"295-308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02731-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Continued advances in variant effect prediction are necessary to demonstrate the ability of machine learning methods to accurately determine the clinical impact of variants of unknown significance (VUS). Towards this goal, the ARSA Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenge was designed to characterize progress by utilizing 219 experimentally assayed missense VUS in the Arylsulfatase A (ARSA) gene to assess the performance of community-submitted predictions of variant functional effects. The challenge involved 15 teams, and evaluated additional predictions from established and recently released models. Notably, a model developed by participants of a genetics and coding bootcamp, trained with standard machine-learning tools in Python, demonstrated superior performance among submissions. Furthermore, the study observed that state-of-the-art deep learning methods provided small but statistically significant improvement in predictive performance compared to less elaborate techniques. These findings underscore the utility of variant effect prediction, and the potential for models trained with modest resources to accurately classify VUS in genetic and clinical research.
为了证明机器学习方法能够准确地确定未知显著性变异(VUS)的临床影响,变体效应预测的持续进展是必要的。为了实现这一目标,ARSA基因组解释关键评估(CAGI)挑战旨在通过利用219个实验检测的Arylsulfatase A (ARSA)基因错义VUS来评估社区提交的变异功能效应预测的性能,从而表征进展。这项挑战涉及15个团队,并评估了来自已建立和最近发布的模型的额外预测。值得注意的是,一个由遗传学和编码训练营参与者开发的模型,在Python中接受了标准机器学习工具的训练,在提交的作品中表现出了卓越的性能。此外,该研究发现,与不那么复杂的技术相比,最先进的深度学习方法在预测性能方面提供了微小但统计上显著的改进。这些发现强调了变异效应预测的效用,以及在遗传和临床研究中使用适度资源训练的模型准确分类VUS的潜力。
期刊介绍:
Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology.
Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted.
The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.