Preparation and Application of Thickened Foods using Lotus Root Starch Powder for Post-Stroke Dysphagic Patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Mingyue Xiong, Manwa L Ng
{"title":"Preparation and Application of Thickened Foods using Lotus Root Starch Powder for Post-Stroke Dysphagic Patients.","authors":"Mingyue Xiong, Manwa L Ng","doi":"10.1159/000545168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study explored the ways to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies using lotus root starch (LRS) powder and evaluated their efficacy in treating post-stroke dysphagic patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thickened liquids matching the four consistency levels advocated by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines were prepared. To assess their clinical applicability, 76 post-stroke dysphagic patients were randomly divided into three groups: a xanthan gum (XG) group (n=26), an LRS group (n=26), and a control group (n=24). All groups received an intervention including swallow-related exercises and oral feeding training. The control group used regular foods (water, juice, congee, egg custard, and banana puree), while the XG and LRS groups used their respective thickened liquids. Swallowing performance was assessed before and after the intervention using the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and gastric tube use duration and removal rate, incidence of adverse reactions, and cost of thickening associated with the three groups were obtained after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While all groups experienced a significant improvement after the intervention, as indicated by the SSA and PAS scores, the XG and LRS groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group. In addition, the XG and LRS patients had shorter gastric tube use, greater removal rate, and fewer incidence of adverse reactions than the controls. The cost of XG was greater than that of LRS powder for the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LRS powder can be used to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies following the IDDSI framework. Its efficacy and safety in treating dysphagia are comparable to XG based thickeners. However, seeing its markedly lower cost, LRS powder can be considered a viable alternative to XG based commercial thickeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study explored the ways to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies using lotus root starch (LRS) powder and evaluated their efficacy in treating post-stroke dysphagic patients.

Method: Thickened liquids matching the four consistency levels advocated by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines were prepared. To assess their clinical applicability, 76 post-stroke dysphagic patients were randomly divided into three groups: a xanthan gum (XG) group (n=26), an LRS group (n=26), and a control group (n=24). All groups received an intervention including swallow-related exercises and oral feeding training. The control group used regular foods (water, juice, congee, egg custard, and banana puree), while the XG and LRS groups used their respective thickened liquids. Swallowing performance was assessed before and after the intervention using the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and gastric tube use duration and removal rate, incidence of adverse reactions, and cost of thickening associated with the three groups were obtained after intervention.

Results: While all groups experienced a significant improvement after the intervention, as indicated by the SSA and PAS scores, the XG and LRS groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group. In addition, the XG and LRS patients had shorter gastric tube use, greater removal rate, and fewer incidence of adverse reactions than the controls. The cost of XG was greater than that of LRS powder for the intervention.

Conclusion: LRS powder can be used to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies following the IDDSI framework. Its efficacy and safety in treating dysphagia are comparable to XG based thickeners. However, seeing its markedly lower cost, LRS powder can be considered a viable alternative to XG based commercial thickeners.

藕粉增稠食品对脑卒中后吞咽困难患者的制备及应用。
目的:探讨用莲藕淀粉粉制备不同浓度的增稠液的方法,并评价其对脑卒中后吞咽困难患者的治疗效果。方法:制备符合国际吞咽困难饮食标准化倡议(IDDSI)指南所倡导的四个稠度的增稠液体。为评估其临床适用性,将76例脑卒中后吞咽困难患者随机分为黄原胶组(n=26)、LRS组(n=26)和对照组(n=24)。所有组均接受干预,包括吞咽相关练习和口腔喂养训练。对照组使用常规食物(水、果汁、粥、蛋羹和香蕉泥),而XG组和LRS组使用各自的增稠液体。采用标准化吞咽评估(SSA)、渗透吸入量表(PAS)评估干预前后患者的吞咽表现,并在干预后获得三组患者胃管使用时间、拔除率、不良反应发生率、增厚成本等相关数据。结果:干预后各组均有明显改善,如SSA和PAS评分,XG组和LRS组明显优于对照组。此外,与对照组相比,XG组和LRS组的胃管使用时间更短,拔除率更高,不良反应发生率更低。XG的干预成本大于LRS粉的干预成本。结论:在IDDSI框架下,LRS粉可用于制备不同浓度的增稠液体。其治疗吞咽困难的疗效和安全性与XG基增稠剂相当。然而,由于其成本明显较低,LRS粉末可以被认为是基于XG的商业增稠剂的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信