Preparation and Application of Thickened Foods using Lotus Root Starch Powder for Post-Stroke Dysphagic Patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Mingyue Xiong, Manwa L Ng
{"title":"Preparation and Application of Thickened Foods using Lotus Root Starch Powder for Post-Stroke Dysphagic Patients.","authors":"Mingyue Xiong, Manwa L Ng","doi":"10.1159/000545168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study explored the ways to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies using lotus root starch (LRS) powder and evaluated their efficacy in treating post-stroke dysphagic patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thickened liquids matching the four consistency levels advocated by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines were prepared. To assess their clinical applicability, 76 post-stroke dysphagic patients were randomly divided into three groups: a xanthan gum (XG) group (n=26), an LRS group (n=26), and a control group (n=24). All groups received an intervention including swallow-related exercises and oral feeding training. The control group used regular foods (water, juice, congee, egg custard, and banana puree), while the XG and LRS groups used their respective thickened liquids. Swallowing performance was assessed before and after the intervention using the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and gastric tube use duration and removal rate, incidence of adverse reactions, and cost of thickening associated with the three groups were obtained after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While all groups experienced a significant improvement after the intervention, as indicated by the SSA and PAS scores, the XG and LRS groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group. In addition, the XG and LRS patients had shorter gastric tube use, greater removal rate, and fewer incidence of adverse reactions than the controls. The cost of XG was greater than that of LRS powder for the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LRS powder can be used to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies following the IDDSI framework. Its efficacy and safety in treating dysphagia are comparable to XG based thickeners. However, seeing its markedly lower cost, LRS powder can be considered a viable alternative to XG based commercial thickeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study explored the ways to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies using lotus root starch (LRS) powder and evaluated their efficacy in treating post-stroke dysphagic patients.

Method: Thickened liquids matching the four consistency levels advocated by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines were prepared. To assess their clinical applicability, 76 post-stroke dysphagic patients were randomly divided into three groups: a xanthan gum (XG) group (n=26), an LRS group (n=26), and a control group (n=24). All groups received an intervention including swallow-related exercises and oral feeding training. The control group used regular foods (water, juice, congee, egg custard, and banana puree), while the XG and LRS groups used their respective thickened liquids. Swallowing performance was assessed before and after the intervention using the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and gastric tube use duration and removal rate, incidence of adverse reactions, and cost of thickening associated with the three groups were obtained after intervention.

Results: While all groups experienced a significant improvement after the intervention, as indicated by the SSA and PAS scores, the XG and LRS groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group. In addition, the XG and LRS patients had shorter gastric tube use, greater removal rate, and fewer incidence of adverse reactions than the controls. The cost of XG was greater than that of LRS powder for the intervention.

Conclusion: LRS powder can be used to prepare thickened liquids of different consistencies following the IDDSI framework. Its efficacy and safety in treating dysphagia are comparable to XG based thickeners. However, seeing its markedly lower cost, LRS powder can be considered a viable alternative to XG based commercial thickeners.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信