Multimodal Pain Control in Headaches Associated With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lindsey F East, Leslie A Hamilton, Thomas Christianson, Terrance Nowell, MaryKathleen Ryan, A Shaun Rowe
{"title":"Multimodal Pain Control in Headaches Associated With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Lindsey F East, Leslie A Hamilton, Thomas Christianson, Terrance Nowell, MaryKathleen Ryan, A Shaun Rowe","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intractable headaches are a common occurrence in patients experiencing an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Utilization of multimodal pain management regimens has become the standard of care for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a new multimodal pain regimen for headache in patients who have experienced aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an Institutional Review Board approved study evaluating the use of a multimodal pain regimen for treatment of headache pain in 104 patients who experienced aSAH in a neuro intensive care unit. Patients diagnosed with aSAH from January 2017 to December 2019, which was prior to the implementation of the multimodal pain regimen, were compared to aSAH patients from March 2020 through 2022, who were treated with the multimodal pain regimen. The primary endpoint was morphine milligram equivalent usage during the first 5 days of admission before and after the implementation of the multimodal pain regimen. The secondary endpoints were pain scores during the first 5 days of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As compared to those who did not receive the aSAH headache pathway (n = 39, premultimodal regimen), those who did receive the pathway (n = 65, multimodal regimen) received significantly more morphine milligram equivalents over the first 5 days of admission (30.0 [0, 97.5] vs 82.5 [15, 135]); P = 0.0053. There was no difference in the median average pain score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MM pain pathway did not reduce the total morphine equivalents utilized for the treatment of aSAH-associated headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Intractable headaches are a common occurrence in patients experiencing an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Utilization of multimodal pain management regimens has become the standard of care for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a new multimodal pain regimen for headache in patients who have experienced aSAH.

Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board approved study evaluating the use of a multimodal pain regimen for treatment of headache pain in 104 patients who experienced aSAH in a neuro intensive care unit. Patients diagnosed with aSAH from January 2017 to December 2019, which was prior to the implementation of the multimodal pain regimen, were compared to aSAH patients from March 2020 through 2022, who were treated with the multimodal pain regimen. The primary endpoint was morphine milligram equivalent usage during the first 5 days of admission before and after the implementation of the multimodal pain regimen. The secondary endpoints were pain scores during the first 5 days of admission.

Results: As compared to those who did not receive the aSAH headache pathway (n = 39, premultimodal regimen), those who did receive the pathway (n = 65, multimodal regimen) received significantly more morphine milligram equivalents over the first 5 days of admission (30.0 [0, 97.5] vs 82.5 [15, 135]); P = 0.0053. There was no difference in the median average pain score.

Conclusions: The MM pain pathway did not reduce the total morphine equivalents utilized for the treatment of aSAH-associated headache.

蛛网膜下腔出血相关头痛的多模式疼痛控制。
目的:顽固性头痛是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者的常见症状。利用多模式疼痛管理方案已成为治疗急性和慢性疼痛的标准护理。本研究的主要目的是评估一种新的多模式疼痛治疗方案在经历过aSAH的头痛患者中的应用。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会批准的研究,评估了在神经重症监护室经历aSAH的104例患者中使用多模式疼痛方案治疗头痛。将2017年1月至2019年12月(多模式疼痛方案实施之前)诊断为aSAH的患者与2020年3月至2022年接受多模式疼痛方案治疗的aSAH患者进行比较。主要终点是实施多模式疼痛方案前后入院前5天吗啡毫克当量的使用情况。次要终点是入院前5天的疼痛评分。结果:与未接受aSAH头痛途径治疗的患者(n = 39,前多模式治疗方案)相比,接受aSAH头痛途径治疗的患者(n = 65,多模式治疗方案)在入院前5天内接受了更多的吗啡毫克当量(30.0[0,97.5]对82.5 [15,135]);P = 0.0053。中位平均疼痛评分没有差异。结论:MM疼痛通路并没有减少用于治疗asah相关头痛的总吗啡当量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信