Enhancing Bacterial Phenotype Classification Through the Integration of Autogating and Automated Machine Learning in Flow Cytometric Analysis

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
In Jae Jeong, Jin-Kyung Hong, Young Jun Bae, Tea Kwon Lee
{"title":"Enhancing Bacterial Phenotype Classification Through the Integration of Autogating and Automated Machine Learning in Flow Cytometric Analysis","authors":"In Jae Jeong,&nbsp;Jin-Kyung Hong,&nbsp;Young Jun Bae,&nbsp;Tea Kwon Lee","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although flow cytometry produces reliable results, the data processing from gating to fingerprinting is prone to subjective bias. Here, we integrated autogating with Automated Machine Learning in flow cytometry to enhance the classification of bacterial phenotypes. We analyzed six bacterial strains prevalent in the soil and groundwater—\n <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>\n , \n <i>Burkholderia thailandensis</i>\n , \n <i>Corynebacterium glutamicum</i>\n , \n <i>Escherichia coli</i>\n , \n <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>\n , and \n <i>Pseudomonas stutzeri</i>\n . Using the H2O-AutoML framework, we applied gradient-boosting machine (GBM) models to classify bacteria across different metabolic phases. Our results demonstrated an overall classification accuracy of 82.34% for GBM. Notably, accuracy varied across metabolic phases, with the highest observed during the late log (88.06%), lag (88.43%), and early log phases (89.37%), whereas the stationary phase showed a slightly lower accuracy of 80.73%. \n <i>P. stutzeri</i>\n exhibited consistently high sensitivity and specificity across all the phases, which indicated that it was the most distinctly identifiable strain. In contrast, \n <i>E. coli</i>\n showed low sensitivity, particularly in the stationary phase, which indicated challenges in its classification. Overall, this study with incorporating autogating and the AutoML framework, substantially reduces subjective biases and enhances the reproducibility and accuracy of microbial classification. Our methodology offers a robust framework for microbial classification in flow cytometric analysis, paving the way for more precise and comprehensive analyses of microbial ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":"107 3","pages":"203-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.a.24923","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although flow cytometry produces reliable results, the data processing from gating to fingerprinting is prone to subjective bias. Here, we integrated autogating with Automated Machine Learning in flow cytometry to enhance the classification of bacterial phenotypes. We analyzed six bacterial strains prevalent in the soil and groundwater— Bacillus subtilis , Burkholderia thailandensis , Corynebacterium glutamicum , Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas putida , and Pseudomonas stutzeri . Using the H2O-AutoML framework, we applied gradient-boosting machine (GBM) models to classify bacteria across different metabolic phases. Our results demonstrated an overall classification accuracy of 82.34% for GBM. Notably, accuracy varied across metabolic phases, with the highest observed during the late log (88.06%), lag (88.43%), and early log phases (89.37%), whereas the stationary phase showed a slightly lower accuracy of 80.73%. P. stutzeri exhibited consistently high sensitivity and specificity across all the phases, which indicated that it was the most distinctly identifiable strain. In contrast, E. coli showed low sensitivity, particularly in the stationary phase, which indicated challenges in its classification. Overall, this study with incorporating autogating and the AutoML framework, substantially reduces subjective biases and enhances the reproducibility and accuracy of microbial classification. Our methodology offers a robust framework for microbial classification in flow cytometric analysis, paving the way for more precise and comprehensive analyses of microbial ecology.

Abstract Image

在流式细胞术分析中集成自动控制和自动机器学习增强细菌表型分类。
虽然流式细胞术产生可靠的结果,但从门控到指纹的数据处理容易产生主观偏差。在这里,我们将自动门控与流式细胞术中的自动机器学习结合起来,以增强细菌表型的分类。我们分析了土壤和地下水中常见的6种细菌——枯草芽孢杆菌、泰国伯克霍尔德菌、谷氨酸杆状杆菌、大肠杆菌、恶臭假单胞菌和stutzeri假单胞菌。使用H2O-AutoML框架,我们应用梯度增强机(GBM)模型对不同代谢阶段的细菌进行分类。我们的结果表明,GBM的总体分类准确率为82.34%。值得注意的是,准确率在不同的代谢阶段有所不同,最高的是后期(88.06%),滞后(88.43%)和早期(89.37%),而平稳期的准确率略低,为80.73%。stutzeri在所有阶段均表现出一贯的高敏感性和特异性,这表明它是最容易识别的菌株。相比之下,大肠杆菌表现出较低的敏感性,特别是在固定相,这表明了其分类的挑战。综上所述,本研究结合了autogating和AutoML框架,大大减少了主观偏差,提高了微生物分类的可重复性和准确性。我们的方法为流式细胞分析中的微生物分类提供了一个强大的框架,为更精确和全面的微生物生态学分析铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信