Calcaneal Ultrasound Attenuation: Does the Region of Interest and Loading Influence the Repeatability of Measurement?

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Aaron P Robertson, Brendan J Jones, Christian M Langton, Scott C Wearing
{"title":"Calcaneal Ultrasound Attenuation: Does the Region of Interest and Loading Influence the Repeatability of Measurement?","authors":"Aaron P Robertson, Brendan J Jones, Christian M Langton, Scott C Wearing","doi":"10.1007/s00223-025-01357-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current calcaneal quantitative ultrasound systems assess different regions of interest (ROI), under different levels of lower limb loading, yield different parameter values, and are likely prone to different levels of error. This study evaluated the repeatability of measures of frequency-dependent attenuation (FDA, 0.3-0.8 MHz) at three calcaneal ROI, Brooke-Wavell (BW), Jaworski (JA), and foot gauge (FG), under four loading conditions (non-weightbearing, semi-weightbearing, bipedal stance, and unipedal stance). FDA in the calcaneus was assessed in 20 healthy participants (mean (± SD) age, 41.7 ± 19.6 years; height, 1.70 ± 0.16 m; and weight, 70.1 ± 23.0 kg) using a custom-built transmission-mode ultrasound system. Reliability was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and limits of agreement (LA) and tolerance (95%TL). Differences in mean FDA values between ROI, loading, and measurement occasions were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA (α = .05). Mean FDA values ranged between 58.0 ± 32.0 and 77.2 ± 27.6 dB/MHz across all conditions. Repeatability of FDA was dependent on the ROI examined and tended to improve with weightbearing. The narrowest limits for 95%TL ranged between ± 15.1 dB/MHz (JA SWB) and ± 62.7 dB/MHz (BW NWB) across sites. The SEM was approximately 10 dB/MHz for both FG and JA during non-weightbearing and was reduced to around 5 dB/MHz with full weightbearing. This study demonstrates that, although measures of ultrasound FDA are dependent on the ROI, lower limb loading may be a useful method to improve the repeatability of FDA measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9601,"journal":{"name":"Calcified Tissue International","volume":"116 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcified Tissue International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-025-01357-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current calcaneal quantitative ultrasound systems assess different regions of interest (ROI), under different levels of lower limb loading, yield different parameter values, and are likely prone to different levels of error. This study evaluated the repeatability of measures of frequency-dependent attenuation (FDA, 0.3-0.8 MHz) at three calcaneal ROI, Brooke-Wavell (BW), Jaworski (JA), and foot gauge (FG), under four loading conditions (non-weightbearing, semi-weightbearing, bipedal stance, and unipedal stance). FDA in the calcaneus was assessed in 20 healthy participants (mean (± SD) age, 41.7 ± 19.6 years; height, 1.70 ± 0.16 m; and weight, 70.1 ± 23.0 kg) using a custom-built transmission-mode ultrasound system. Reliability was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and limits of agreement (LA) and tolerance (95%TL). Differences in mean FDA values between ROI, loading, and measurement occasions were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA (α = .05). Mean FDA values ranged between 58.0 ± 32.0 and 77.2 ± 27.6 dB/MHz across all conditions. Repeatability of FDA was dependent on the ROI examined and tended to improve with weightbearing. The narrowest limits for 95%TL ranged between ± 15.1 dB/MHz (JA SWB) and ± 62.7 dB/MHz (BW NWB) across sites. The SEM was approximately 10 dB/MHz for both FG and JA during non-weightbearing and was reduced to around 5 dB/MHz with full weightbearing. This study demonstrates that, although measures of ultrasound FDA are dependent on the ROI, lower limb loading may be a useful method to improve the repeatability of FDA measurements.

跟骨超声衰减:感兴趣的区域和负荷是否影响测量的重复性?
目前的跟骨定量超声系统评估不同的感兴趣区域(ROI),在不同水平的下肢负荷下,产生不同的参数值,并且可能容易产生不同程度的误差。本研究评估了三种跟骨ROI, brooke - wavl (BW), Jaworski (JA)和foot gauge (FG)在四种负载条件下(非负重,半负重,两足站立和单足站立)测量频率相关衰减(FDA, 0.3-0.8 MHz)的可重复性。20名健康受试者(平均(±SD)年龄:41.7±19.6岁;高度:1.70±0.16 m;重量为70.1±23.0 kg),采用定制的透射式超声系统。采用测量标准误差(SEM)、一致限(LA)和容限(95%TL)评估可靠性。采用重复测量方差分析(α = 0.05)评估ROI、负载和测量场合之间的平均FDA值的差异。在所有条件下,平均FDA值在58.0±32.0和77.2±27.6 dB/MHz之间。FDA的重复性依赖于所检查的ROI,并随着重量的增加而提高。95%TL的最小限值在±15.1 dB/MHz (JA SWB)和±62.7 dB/MHz (BW NWB)之间。在非负重期间,FG和JA的SEM约为10 dB/MHz,而在完全负重时则降至5 dB/MHz左右。本研究表明,虽然超声FDA的测量依赖于ROI,但下肢负荷可能是提高FDA测量可重复性的有用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Calcified Tissue International
Calcified Tissue International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Calcified Tissue International and Musculoskeletal Research publishes original research and reviews concerning the structure and function of bone, and other musculoskeletal tissues in living organisms and clinical studies of musculoskeletal disease. It includes studies of cell biology, molecular biology, intracellular signalling, and physiology, as well as research into the hormones, cytokines and other mediators that influence the musculoskeletal system. The journal also publishes clinical studies of relevance to bone disease, mineral metabolism, muscle function, and musculoskeletal interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信