Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis with Up-and-Over Technique.

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114
Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto
{"title":"Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis with Up-and-Over Technique.","authors":"Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. <b>Results:</b> No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. Methods: From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. Results: No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. Conclusions: The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.

血管内修复髂动脉瘤的戈尔髂分支内假体与上翻技术。
目的:Gore髂分支内假体(IBE)能够重建髂内动脉(IIA),扩大血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的适应症;然而,向上和向下的技术是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在阐明上翻技术的优点和程序限制。方法:2019年1月至2022年10月,纳入22例使用Gore IBE进行IIA重建的患者。将患者分为S组和Up组,分别采用标准和上翻技术进行IIA重建。检查主动脉解剖测量、手术因素和术后结果。结果:S组(12例)与Up组(10例)在手术时间、透视时间、造影剂使用、出血量、术后住院时间等方面均无显著差异。然而,Up组肾下动脉到重建IIA起始点的距离明显短于S组。在19个月的随访中,Up组无不良事件发生。结论:对于使用Gore IBE的标准程序难以重建IIA的病例,向上翻转技术是一种有价值的选择。因此,了解程序预防措施和确保安全是其成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信