{"title":"Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis with Up-and-Over Technique.","authors":"Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. <b>Results:</b> No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. Methods: From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. Results: No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. Conclusions: The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.