A Systematic Review of modern endovascular techniques compared to surgery for acute limb ischaemia.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
F Mannan, L Ugwumba, T El-Sayed, A Saratzis, S Nandhra
{"title":"A Systematic Review of modern endovascular techniques compared to surgery for acute limb ischaemia.","authors":"F Mannan, L Ugwumba, T El-Sayed, A Saratzis, S Nandhra","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute limb ischemia (ALI) represents a critical vascular emergency, conventionally managed with surgical intervention in cases of threatened limbs. However, the increasing application of modern endovascular techniques, such as percutaneous thrombectomy, has emerged as an alternative treatment approach for ALI. This systematic review evaluates the contemporary management of ALI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy using search engines (Cochrane, Medline, PubMed, and Embase) was carried out to identify eligible studies reporting on short and mid-term survival and limb salvage outcomes following percutaneous thrombectomy in the ALI management. This review was registered within the PROSPERO database and developed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,383 studies were screened, and 25 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the review, all of which were observational in nature. The included studies reported on the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy but did not provide comparisons with conventional open surgical interventions. The 30-day and one-year survival rates following mechanical thrombectomy were 94.7% and 86.6%, respectively. The 30-day and one-year limb salvage rates were 95.2% and 90.1%, respectively CONCLUSION: Mechanical thrombectomy demonstrates promising short and mid-term outcomes in the management of acute limb ischemia. However, the lack of direct comparisons with conventional open surgery limits the ability to definitively assess its relative efficacy. Further comparative studies are necessary to establish its role as a primary treatment modality for acute limb ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) represents a critical vascular emergency, conventionally managed with surgical intervention in cases of threatened limbs. However, the increasing application of modern endovascular techniques, such as percutaneous thrombectomy, has emerged as an alternative treatment approach for ALI. This systematic review evaluates the contemporary management of ALI.

Methods: A comprehensive search strategy using search engines (Cochrane, Medline, PubMed, and Embase) was carried out to identify eligible studies reporting on short and mid-term survival and limb salvage outcomes following percutaneous thrombectomy in the ALI management. This review was registered within the PROSPERO database and developed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Results: A total of 1,383 studies were screened, and 25 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the review, all of which were observational in nature. The included studies reported on the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy but did not provide comparisons with conventional open surgical interventions. The 30-day and one-year survival rates following mechanical thrombectomy were 94.7% and 86.6%, respectively. The 30-day and one-year limb salvage rates were 95.2% and 90.1%, respectively CONCLUSION: Mechanical thrombectomy demonstrates promising short and mid-term outcomes in the management of acute limb ischemia. However, the lack of direct comparisons with conventional open surgery limits the ability to definitively assess its relative efficacy. Further comparative studies are necessary to establish its role as a primary treatment modality for acute limb ischemia.

导言:急性肢体缺血(ALI)是一种严重的血管急症,在肢体受到威胁的情况下,传统的治疗方法是手术干预。然而,现代血管内技术(如经皮血栓切除术)的应用日益广泛,已成为急性肢体缺血的另一种治疗方法。本系统综述评估了 ALI 的现代治疗方法:方法:使用搜索引擎(Cochrane、Medline、PubMed 和 Embase)进行了全面搜索,以确定符合条件的研究,这些研究报告了 ALI 治疗中经皮血栓切除术后的中短期存活率和肢体挽救效果。本综述在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册,并按照 PRISMA 指南进行编写:共筛选了 1,383 项研究,并对 25 篇全文文章进行了资格评估。有 16 项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入综述,所有研究均为观察性研究。纳入的研究报告了机械血栓切除术的安全性和有效性,但没有提供与传统开放手术干预的比较。机械血栓切除术后的 30 天和一年存活率分别为 94.7% 和 86.6%。30天和一年的肢体挽救率分别为95.2%和90.1% 结论:在急性肢体缺血的治疗中,机械血栓切除术显示出良好的短期和中期疗效。然而,由于缺乏与传统开放手术的直接比较,因此无法明确评估其相对疗效。有必要进一步开展比较研究,以确定其作为急性肢体缺血主要治疗方式的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信