Apnoeic oxygenation in pediatric anesthesia: better safe than sorry!

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Davut Deniz Uzun, Felix Hezel, Stefan Mohr, Markus A Weigand, Felix C F Schmitt
{"title":"Apnoeic oxygenation in pediatric anesthesia: better safe than sorry!","authors":"Davut Deniz Uzun, Felix Hezel, Stefan Mohr, Markus A Weigand, Felix C F Schmitt","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02995-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children, especially neonates and infants, are at particularly high risk of hypoxemia during induction of anesthesia. The addition of nasal apnoeic oxygenation (ApOx) during tracheal intubation should prolong safe apnoea time without desaturation and reduce the risk of hypoxemia. Despite the recommendations in the relevant European guidelines, their implementation in pediatric anesthesia in Germany is not yet known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted in July and October 2024 via email to all registered members of the scientific working group on airway management, the scientific working group on pediatric anesthesia of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and hospitals of all levels in Germany. Participants were asked about their personal and institutional background and the use of ApOx in pediatric anesthesia in their institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the eight hundred participants invited, 304 anesthetists completed the survey (response rate 38%). In addition, 36 of 109 invited anesthetists from the scientific working group on pediatric anesthesia were interviewed as a separate expert group. 201 (66.1%) of the anesthetists surveyed in the general group stated that they worked regular in pediatric anesthesia (pediatric anesthesia expert group: 94.4%). 64.2% of the general respondents considered pediatric patients to be at an increased risk of reduced apnoea time. 46.7% of the general participants are of the opinion that pediatric patients should generally not receive ApOx during induction of anesthesia. If ApOx is performed, then most likely with a standard nasal cannula. ApOx was generally used in infants with an oxygen flow rate of ≤ 2 l/min or 0.2 l/kg bodyweight/min. A relevant proportion of anesthetists were unaware that current European guidelines recommend ApOx for neonates and infants (general participants: 62.5%, pediatric anesthesia expert group: 39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the recommendations in the guidelines, the use of ApOx does not appear to be standard practice at present. Furthermore, the surveyed physicians exhibited considerable uncertainty regarding ApOx. It is imperative that further improvements are made in the dissemination of the current guidelines with a view to enhancing patient safety during pediatric anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02995-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children, especially neonates and infants, are at particularly high risk of hypoxemia during induction of anesthesia. The addition of nasal apnoeic oxygenation (ApOx) during tracheal intubation should prolong safe apnoea time without desaturation and reduce the risk of hypoxemia. Despite the recommendations in the relevant European guidelines, their implementation in pediatric anesthesia in Germany is not yet known.

Methods: A survey was conducted in July and October 2024 via email to all registered members of the scientific working group on airway management, the scientific working group on pediatric anesthesia of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and hospitals of all levels in Germany. Participants were asked about their personal and institutional background and the use of ApOx in pediatric anesthesia in their institution.

Results: Of the eight hundred participants invited, 304 anesthetists completed the survey (response rate 38%). In addition, 36 of 109 invited anesthetists from the scientific working group on pediatric anesthesia were interviewed as a separate expert group. 201 (66.1%) of the anesthetists surveyed in the general group stated that they worked regular in pediatric anesthesia (pediatric anesthesia expert group: 94.4%). 64.2% of the general respondents considered pediatric patients to be at an increased risk of reduced apnoea time. 46.7% of the general participants are of the opinion that pediatric patients should generally not receive ApOx during induction of anesthesia. If ApOx is performed, then most likely with a standard nasal cannula. ApOx was generally used in infants with an oxygen flow rate of ≤ 2 l/min or 0.2 l/kg bodyweight/min. A relevant proportion of anesthetists were unaware that current European guidelines recommend ApOx for neonates and infants (general participants: 62.5%, pediatric anesthesia expert group: 39%).

Conclusions: Despite the recommendations in the guidelines, the use of ApOx does not appear to be standard practice at present. Furthermore, the surveyed physicians exhibited considerable uncertainty regarding ApOx. It is imperative that further improvements are made in the dissemination of the current guidelines with a view to enhancing patient safety during pediatric anesthesia.

小儿麻醉中的窒息氧合:安全总比后悔好!
背景:儿童,尤其是新生儿和婴儿,在麻醉诱导时低氧血症的风险特别高。在气管插管期间增加鼻呼吸暂停氧合(ApOx)可以延长安全的呼吸暂停时间而不发生去饱和,并降低低氧血症的风险。尽管在相关的欧洲指南中有建议,但它们在德国儿科麻醉中的实施情况尚不清楚。方法:于2024年7月和10月通过电子邮件对德国麻醉与重症监护医学学会(DGAI)气道管理科学工作组、儿科麻醉科学工作组及德国各级医院的所有注册成员进行调查。参与者被问及他们的个人和机构背景以及他们所在机构在儿科麻醉中使用ApOx的情况。结果:在800名被邀请的麻醉师中,有304名完成了调查,回复率为38%。此外,109名来自儿科麻醉科学工作组的受邀麻醉师中的36名作为单独的专家组接受了采访。普通组中有201名(66.1%)的受访麻醉医师表示自己经常在儿科麻醉工作(儿科麻醉专家组:94.4%)。64.2%的普通受访者认为儿科患者呼吸暂停时间缩短的风险增加。46.7%的普通参与者认为儿科患者一般不应在麻醉诱导时使用ApOx。如果做了鼻导管穿刺,那么很可能使用标准鼻插管。ApOx一般用于氧流量≤2l /min或0.2 l/kg体重/min的婴儿。相关比例的麻醉师不知道目前的欧洲指南推荐新生儿和婴儿使用ApOx(一般参与者:62.5%,儿科麻醉专家组:39%)。结论:尽管指南中有建议,但目前使用ApOx似乎并不是标准做法。此外,接受调查的医生对ApOx表现出相当大的不确定性。当务之急是进一步改进现行指南的传播,以加强儿童麻醉期间患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信