Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Deena P. Harji, Ben Griffiths, Deborah Stocken, Rupert Pearse, Jane Blazeby, Julia M. Brown
{"title":"Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review","authors":"Deena P. Harji, Ben Griffiths, Deborah Stocken, Rupert Pearse, Jane Blazeby, Julia M. Brown","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00597-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is a complex clinical arena, delivering time-sensitive, definitive care to a high-risk patient cohort, with significant rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Embedding perioperative care pathways within this complex setting has the potential to improve post-operative outcomes, however, requires an in-depth understanding of their design, delivery and outcome assessment. Delivering and implementing complex interventions such as perioperative pathways require transparent reporting with detailed and indepth description of all components during the assessment and evaluation phase. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the current design and reporting of perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting. The OVID SP versions of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between January 1950 and December 2023. All randomised and non-randomised cohort studies reporting outcomes on perioperative care pathways in adult patients (> 18 years old) undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery were included. A narrative description of all perioperative pathways included was reported to identify design and description of the pathway including the delivery and timing of component interventions. All pathways were evaluated against the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Eleven RCTs and 19 non-randomised studies were identified, with most studies considered to be at moderate risk of bias. Twenty-six unique pathways were identified and described, delivering a total of 400 component interventions across 44,055 patients. Component interventions were classified into 24 domains across the perioperative pathway. Twenty studies (66.6%) did not report the TIDieR framework items, with thirteen studies reporting less than 50% of all items. Two hundred and fifty individual outcomes were reported across pathways, with the most commonly reported outcomes related to morbidity, mortality and length of stay. Current perioperative pathways in EmLap setting are underpinned by variable component interventions, with a lack of in-depth intervention reporting and evaluation. Future studies should incorporate the TIDieR checklist when reporting on perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00597-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is a complex clinical arena, delivering time-sensitive, definitive care to a high-risk patient cohort, with significant rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Embedding perioperative care pathways within this complex setting has the potential to improve post-operative outcomes, however, requires an in-depth understanding of their design, delivery and outcome assessment. Delivering and implementing complex interventions such as perioperative pathways require transparent reporting with detailed and indepth description of all components during the assessment and evaluation phase. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the current design and reporting of perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting. The OVID SP versions of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between January 1950 and December 2023. All randomised and non-randomised cohort studies reporting outcomes on perioperative care pathways in adult patients (> 18 years old) undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery were included. A narrative description of all perioperative pathways included was reported to identify design and description of the pathway including the delivery and timing of component interventions. All pathways were evaluated against the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Eleven RCTs and 19 non-randomised studies were identified, with most studies considered to be at moderate risk of bias. Twenty-six unique pathways were identified and described, delivering a total of 400 component interventions across 44,055 patients. Component interventions were classified into 24 domains across the perioperative pathway. Twenty studies (66.6%) did not report the TIDieR framework items, with thirteen studies reporting less than 50% of all items. Two hundred and fifty individual outcomes were reported across pathways, with the most commonly reported outcomes related to morbidity, mortality and length of stay. Current perioperative pathways in EmLap setting are underpinned by variable component interventions, with a lack of in-depth intervention reporting and evaluation. Future studies should incorporate the TIDieR checklist when reporting on perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting. Not applicable.
急诊剖腹手术围手术期护理路径的关键干预措施和结果:系统综述
急诊剖腹手术(EmLap)是一个复杂的临床领域,为高风险患者群体提供时间敏感、明确的护理,具有显著的术后发病率和死亡率。在这种复杂的环境中嵌入围手术期护理路径有可能改善术后结果,然而,需要对其设计、交付和结果评估有深入的了解。提供和实施围手术期通路等复杂干预措施需要透明的报告,并在评估和评价阶段对所有组成部分进行详细和深入的描述。本系统综述的目的是确定EmLap环境下围手术期路径的当前设计和报告。在1950年1月至2023年12月期间检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库的OVID SP版本。所有随机和非随机队列研究均报告了接受重大急诊腹部手术的成年患者(bb0 - 18岁)围手术期护理途径的结果。报告了所有围手术期通路的叙述性描述,以确定通路的设计和描述,包括成分干预的递送和时间。根据干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)检查表对所有途径进行评估。11项随机对照试验和19项非随机研究被确定,其中大多数研究被认为具有中等偏倚风险。确定并描述了26种独特的途径,在44,055名患者中提供了总共400种成分干预措施。通过围手术期通路将干预措施分为24个领域。20项研究(66.6%)没有报告TIDieR框架项目,13项研究报告的项目少于所有项目的50%。报告了250个不同途径的个体结果,最常见的报告结果与发病率、死亡率和住院时间有关。目前EmLap设置的围手术期路径以可变成分干预为基础,缺乏深入的干预报告和评估。未来的研究应在报告EmLap设置的围手术期路径时纳入TIDieR检查表。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信