[Treatment of rotator cuff lesions using autologous conditioned plasma-a systematic review].

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s00132-025-04632-9
Fabian Michalczik, Klemens Trieb
{"title":"[Treatment of rotator cuff lesions using autologous conditioned plasma-a systematic review].","authors":"Fabian Michalczik, Klemens Trieb","doi":"10.1007/s00132-025-04632-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tendinopathies and rotator cuff tears account for significant medical costs in Germany and are driven by degenerative collagen changes. Despite multiple treatment options, no standard exists. This study examines PRP's growing use for pain relief and tissue healing in chronic tendinopathies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Effect of subacromial PRP-injections on VAS pain in patients with chronic tendinopathies and partial ruptures of the rotator cuff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Livivo, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials published up to September 2024 were included; they were evaluated per PRISMA guidelines (2020) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Seven RCTs (n = 612 patients) examined PRP injections for rotator cuff pathologies, comparing them to controls receiving saline (n = 1), physiotherapy (n = 2), hyaluronic acid/combo injections (n = 1), cortisone (n = 2), or prolotherapy/corticosteroid/lidocaine (n = 1). The PRP group showed a significant VAS pain reduction in the 3‑month follow-up compared to the baseline measurement. The intergroup comparison revealed heterogeneous patterns of significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides moderate evidence that PRP may be preferred over other interventions, but may be effective as an additional treatment option. However, further high-quality single intervention placebo-control studies with a larger number of participants are needed to validate this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"294-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04632-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tendinopathies and rotator cuff tears account for significant medical costs in Germany and are driven by degenerative collagen changes. Despite multiple treatment options, no standard exists. This study examines PRP's growing use for pain relief and tissue healing in chronic tendinopathies.

Objective: Effect of subacromial PRP-injections on VAS pain in patients with chronic tendinopathies and partial ruptures of the rotator cuff.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Livivo, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials published up to September 2024 were included; they were evaluated per PRISMA guidelines (2020) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Result: Seven RCTs (n = 612 patients) examined PRP injections for rotator cuff pathologies, comparing them to controls receiving saline (n = 1), physiotherapy (n = 2), hyaluronic acid/combo injections (n = 1), cortisone (n = 2), or prolotherapy/corticosteroid/lidocaine (n = 1). The PRP group showed a significant VAS pain reduction in the 3‑month follow-up compared to the baseline measurement. The intergroup comparison revealed heterogeneous patterns of significance.

Conclusion: This study provides moderate evidence that PRP may be preferred over other interventions, but may be effective as an additional treatment option. However, further high-quality single intervention placebo-control studies with a larger number of participants are needed to validate this result.

自体条件血浆治疗肩袖病变——系统综述。
背景:在德国,腱鞘病和肩袖撕裂是由退行性胶原蛋白改变引起的重大医疗费用。尽管有多种治疗方案,但没有标准。本研究探讨了PRP在慢性肌腱病的疼痛缓解和组织愈合中的日益增长的应用。目的:肩峰下prp注射对慢性肌腱病变和部分肩袖断裂患者VAS疼痛的影响。方法:利用PubMed、Livivo、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library进行系统综述。仅纳入截至2024年9月发表的随机对照试验;根据PRISMA指南(2020)和Cochrane偏倚风险工具对其进行评估。结果:7项rct (n = 612例患者)检查了PRP注射对肩袖病变的影响,并将其与接受生理盐水(n = 1)、物理治疗(n = 2)、透明质酸/复合注射(n = 1)、可的松(n = 2)或前体治疗/皮质类固醇/利多卡因(n = 1)的对照组进行了比较。与基线测量相比,PRP组在3个月的随访中显示VAS疼痛明显减轻。组间比较显示了异质性的显著性模式。结论:本研究提供了适度的证据,表明PRP可能优于其他干预措施,但作为一种额外的治疗选择可能是有效的。然而,需要更多高质量的单干预安慰剂对照研究来验证这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信