How many drugs are repositioned each year in Europe?

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Johnathon Liddicoat, Ashleigh Hamidzadeh, Kathleen Liddell, Mateo Aboy
{"title":"How many drugs are repositioned each year in Europe?","authors":"Johnathon Liddicoat,&nbsp;Ashleigh Hamidzadeh,&nbsp;Kathleen Liddell,&nbsp;Mateo Aboy","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For two decades, commentators have argued for law and policy reform to incentivise organisations to develop new indications for (already) authorised drugs, an area of drug development known as ‘repositioning’. In short, they argue that hurdles in patent and pharmaceutical law hinder repositioning and, therefore, reform is required to increase its use. Yet, these arguments are made primarily on anecdotes; the empirical evidence is scant. One foundational question is how many drugs are repositioned each year in Europe. This study develops a method to examine the number authorised each year. The results show a marked increase in repositioning over the last 3 years, and that the number per year is comparable, though slightly fewer than, the number of <i>new</i> compounds, indicating modest to higher-than-expected activity. This study considers what the results mean for four suggested reform options, including the EU Commission's recent proposal. We conclude that the reforms may not achieve their goals or that further evidence is required before we can know whether they will be effective. Lastly, this paper explains how the method and data in this study could serve as a benchmark for evaluating the success of future reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"28 1","pages":"155-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12327","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For two decades, commentators have argued for law and policy reform to incentivise organisations to develop new indications for (already) authorised drugs, an area of drug development known as ‘repositioning’. In short, they argue that hurdles in patent and pharmaceutical law hinder repositioning and, therefore, reform is required to increase its use. Yet, these arguments are made primarily on anecdotes; the empirical evidence is scant. One foundational question is how many drugs are repositioned each year in Europe. This study develops a method to examine the number authorised each year. The results show a marked increase in repositioning over the last 3 years, and that the number per year is comparable, though slightly fewer than, the number of new compounds, indicating modest to higher-than-expected activity. This study considers what the results mean for four suggested reform options, including the EU Commission's recent proposal. We conclude that the reforms may not achieve their goals or that further evidence is required before we can know whether they will be effective. Lastly, this paper explains how the method and data in this study could serve as a benchmark for evaluating the success of future reforms.

在欧洲,每年有多少药物被重新定位?
20年来,评论员们一直主张进行法律和政策改革,以激励组织为(已经)批准的药物开发新的适应症,这是一个被称为“重新定位”的药物开发领域。简而言之,他们认为专利法和药法中的障碍阻碍了重新定位,因此需要进行改革以增加其使用。然而,这些论点主要是基于轶事;经验证据不足。一个基本问题是,每年有多少药物在欧洲被重新定位。这项研究开发了一种方法来检查每年授权的数量。结果显示,在过去3年中,重新定位的数量显著增加,每年的数量与新化合物的数量相当,尽管略少于新化合物的数量,表明活性适度至高于预期。本研究考虑了四种建议改革方案的结果意味着什么,包括欧盟委员会最近的提议。我们的结论是,改革可能无法实现其目标,或者需要进一步的证据才能知道改革是否有效。最后,本文解释了本研究的方法和数据如何可以作为评估未来改革成功的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信