Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Theodorakys Marín Fermín, Chih-Kai Hong, Lucca Lacheta, Lukas N. Münch, Knut Beitzel, Eoghan T. Hurley, Kai-Lan Hsu, Emmanouil Brilakis, Berte Bøe, Davide Cucchi
{"title":"Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations","authors":"Theodorakys Marín Fermín,&nbsp;Chih-Kai Hong,&nbsp;Lucca Lacheta,&nbsp;Lukas N. Münch,&nbsp;Knut Beitzel,&nbsp;Eoghan T. Hurley,&nbsp;Kai-Lan Hsu,&nbsp;Emmanouil Brilakis,&nbsp;Berte Bøe,&nbsp;Davide Cucchi","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Treatment options for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability include several surgical and non-surgical approaches. Recent trends indicate a shift towards nonoperative treatment, even for severe Rockwood type V injuries, which traditionally required surgery. Despite this shift, some patients may still benefit from surgical stabilisation, particularly if significant pain and disability persist. Modern surgical techniques focus on cortical button systems and restoration of the coracoclavicular ligaments, emphasising the importance of the posterosuperior acromioclavicular capsuloligamentous complex in managing horizontal instability. Clavicular hook plates offer rigid stability but present risks, such as damage to the subacromial structures and acromial erosion. Although anatomical repair techniques have gained prominence due to their biomechanical advantages and have been endorsed by international societies, non-anatomic methods may also provide acceptable outcomes with lower costs. The use of tendon grafts in chronic ACJ instability has shown promise, although evidence for their use in acute cases remains limited. This review discusses various treatment strategies, including operative and nonoperative management, focusing on patient outcomes, complication rates, and return-to-sport scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between surgical and non-surgical treatment must consider individual patient needs and the potential for long-term recovery.</p><p><b>Level of Evidence</b>: Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70173","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment options for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability include several surgical and non-surgical approaches. Recent trends indicate a shift towards nonoperative treatment, even for severe Rockwood type V injuries, which traditionally required surgery. Despite this shift, some patients may still benefit from surgical stabilisation, particularly if significant pain and disability persist. Modern surgical techniques focus on cortical button systems and restoration of the coracoclavicular ligaments, emphasising the importance of the posterosuperior acromioclavicular capsuloligamentous complex in managing horizontal instability. Clavicular hook plates offer rigid stability but present risks, such as damage to the subacromial structures and acromial erosion. Although anatomical repair techniques have gained prominence due to their biomechanical advantages and have been endorsed by international societies, non-anatomic methods may also provide acceptable outcomes with lower costs. The use of tendon grafts in chronic ACJ instability has shown promise, although evidence for their use in acute cases remains limited. This review discusses various treatment strategies, including operative and nonoperative management, focusing on patient outcomes, complication rates, and return-to-sport scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between surgical and non-surgical treatment must consider individual patient needs and the potential for long-term recovery.

Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

急性高位肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗
急性肩锁关节(ACJ)不稳定的治疗选择包括几种手术和非手术方法。最近的趋势表明非手术治疗的转变,即使是严重的Rockwood V型损伤,传统上需要手术治疗。尽管有这种转变,一些患者仍然可以从手术稳定中获益,特别是如果明显的疼痛和残疾持续存在。现代外科技术侧重于皮质钮扣系统和喙锁韧带的修复,强调肩锁关节后上囊寡韧带复合体在处理水平不稳定中的重要性。锁骨钩钢板提供刚性稳定性,但存在风险,如肩峰下结构损伤和肩峰侵蚀。尽管解剖修复技术因其生物力学优势而获得突出地位,并得到国际社会的认可,但非解剖方法也可能以较低的成本提供可接受的结果。肌腱移植物用于慢性ACJ不稳定已显示出希望,尽管其用于急性病例的证据仍然有限。这篇综述讨论了各种治疗策略,包括手术和非手术管理,重点是患者的预后、并发症发生率和恢复运动的情况。最终,手术和非手术治疗之间的选择必须考虑到个别患者的需求和长期恢复的潜力。证据等级:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信