Predicting admission to and length of stay in intensive care units after general anesthesia: Time-dependent role of pre- and intraoperative data for clinical decision-making

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Andrea Stieger , Patrick Schober , Philipp Venetz , Lukas Andereggen , Corina Bello , Mark G. Filipovic , Markus M. Luedi , Markus Huber
{"title":"Predicting admission to and length of stay in intensive care units after general anesthesia: Time-dependent role of pre- and intraoperative data for clinical decision-making","authors":"Andrea Stieger ,&nbsp;Patrick Schober ,&nbsp;Philipp Venetz ,&nbsp;Lukas Andereggen ,&nbsp;Corina Bello ,&nbsp;Mark G. Filipovic ,&nbsp;Markus M. Luedi ,&nbsp;Markus Huber","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate prediction of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS) after major surgery is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and healthcare resources. Factors such as age, BMI, comorbidities, and perioperative complications significantly influence ICU admissions and LOS. Machine learning methods have been increasingly utilized to predict these outcomes, but their clinical utility beyond traditional metrics remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study examined a sub-cohort of 6043 patients who underwent general anesthesia at Seoul National University Hospital from August 2016 to June 2017. Various prediction models, including logistic regression and random forest, were developed for ICU admission and different LOS thresholds, e.g., a LOS of more than a week. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA) across predefined risk preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among patients studied, 19.8 % were admitted to the ICU, with 1.4 % staying longer than a week. Prediction models demonstrated high discrimination (AUROC 0.93 to 0.96) and good calibration for ICU admission and short LOS. DCA revealed that intraoperative data provided the greatest decision-related benefit for predicting ICU admission, while preoperative data became more important for predicting longer LOS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intraoperative data are crucial for immediate postoperative decisions, while preoperative data are essential for extended LOS predictions. These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive risk assessment approach in perioperative care, utilizing both preoperative and intraoperative information to enhance clinical decision-making and resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111810"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate prediction of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS) after major surgery is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and healthcare resources. Factors such as age, BMI, comorbidities, and perioperative complications significantly influence ICU admissions and LOS. Machine learning methods have been increasingly utilized to predict these outcomes, but their clinical utility beyond traditional metrics remains underexplored.

Methods

This study examined a sub-cohort of 6043 patients who underwent general anesthesia at Seoul National University Hospital from August 2016 to June 2017. Various prediction models, including logistic regression and random forest, were developed for ICU admission and different LOS thresholds, e.g., a LOS of more than a week. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA) across predefined risk preferences.

Results

Among patients studied, 19.8 % were admitted to the ICU, with 1.4 % staying longer than a week. Prediction models demonstrated high discrimination (AUROC 0.93 to 0.96) and good calibration for ICU admission and short LOS. DCA revealed that intraoperative data provided the greatest decision-related benefit for predicting ICU admission, while preoperative data became more important for predicting longer LOS.

Conclusion

Intraoperative data are crucial for immediate postoperative decisions, while preoperative data are essential for extended LOS predictions. These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive risk assessment approach in perioperative care, utilizing both preoperative and intraoperative information to enhance clinical decision-making and resource allocation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信