Long-Term Toxicity after Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens Using Total Body Irradiation

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Pranalee Patel MD , Zihan Wan MS , Mairead Dillon BS , Donna Niedzwiecki PhD , Kerri-Anne Crowell MPH , Mitchell E. Horwitz MD , Edina Wang MD , Chris R. Kelsey MD
{"title":"Long-Term Toxicity after Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens Using Total Body Irradiation","authors":"Pranalee Patel MD ,&nbsp;Zihan Wan MS ,&nbsp;Mairead Dillon BS ,&nbsp;Donna Niedzwiecki PhD ,&nbsp;Kerri-Anne Crowell MPH ,&nbsp;Mitchell E. Horwitz MD ,&nbsp;Edina Wang MD ,&nbsp;Chris R. Kelsey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate long-term health risks after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using non-myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>All adult patients undergoing non-myeloablative allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning from 1995 to 2020 at our institution were included. Long-term toxicities, defined as events persisting beyond or occurring after 6 months from the date of transplant, were graded per the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A competing risk analysis was performed to assess the risk of developing long-term toxicities within major organ systems using the Fine-Gray model. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of patients undergoing myeloablative TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 174 patients undergoing nonmyeloablative HSCT were assessed along with 378 myeloablative patients. Nonmyeloablative recipients were older (58 vs 43 years, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), less likely to be transplanted for acute leukemia (35% vs 64%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), more likely to be transplanted for non-malignant conditions (33% vs 11%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and were more likely to have used tobacco (33% vs 22%, <em>P</em> = .009). The median follow-up was 7.4 years. The cumulative incidences of long-term toxicities at 5 years for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative patients, taking into account the competing risk of death, were pulmonary (4% vs 4.8%, <em>P</em> &gt; .9), cardiac (6.8% vs 3.3%, <em>P</em> = .11), renal (4.3% vs 4.1%, <em>P</em> = .9), thyroid (3.6% vs 1.5%, <em>P</em> = .2), other endocrine (3.1% vs 8.8%, <em>P</em> = .04), and cataracts (2.5% vs 2.8%, <em>P</em> = .7). The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was 3.5% vs 1.1% (<em>P</em> = .2) between the 2 cohorts. The proportion of all toxicities that were high-grade (3-5) for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative regimens, respectively, were pulmonary (60% and 69%), cardiac (17% and 45%), renal (27% and 21%), and other endocrine (4% and 2%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recipients of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, despite receiving much lower doses of TBI and chemotherapy, are at risk of developing significant, long-term medical conditions comparable with those undergoing myeloablative HSCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 101738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate long-term health risks after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using non-myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI).

Methods and Materials

All adult patients undergoing non-myeloablative allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning from 1995 to 2020 at our institution were included. Long-term toxicities, defined as events persisting beyond or occurring after 6 months from the date of transplant, were graded per the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A competing risk analysis was performed to assess the risk of developing long-term toxicities within major organ systems using the Fine-Gray model. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of patients undergoing myeloablative TBI.

Results

A total of 174 patients undergoing nonmyeloablative HSCT were assessed along with 378 myeloablative patients. Nonmyeloablative recipients were older (58 vs 43 years, P < .001), less likely to be transplanted for acute leukemia (35% vs 64%, P < .001), more likely to be transplanted for non-malignant conditions (33% vs 11%, P < .001), and were more likely to have used tobacco (33% vs 22%, P = .009). The median follow-up was 7.4 years. The cumulative incidences of long-term toxicities at 5 years for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative patients, taking into account the competing risk of death, were pulmonary (4% vs 4.8%, P > .9), cardiac (6.8% vs 3.3%, P = .11), renal (4.3% vs 4.1%, P = .9), thyroid (3.6% vs 1.5%, P = .2), other endocrine (3.1% vs 8.8%, P = .04), and cataracts (2.5% vs 2.8%, P = .7). The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was 3.5% vs 1.1% (P = .2) between the 2 cohorts. The proportion of all toxicities that were high-grade (3-5) for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative regimens, respectively, were pulmonary (60% and 69%), cardiac (17% and 45%), renal (27% and 21%), and other endocrine (4% and 2%).

Conclusions

Recipients of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, despite receiving much lower doses of TBI and chemotherapy, are at risk of developing significant, long-term medical conditions comparable with those undergoing myeloablative HSCT.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信