Pranalee Patel MD , Zihan Wan MS , Mairead Dillon BS , Donna Niedzwiecki PhD , Kerri-Anne Crowell MPH , Mitchell E. Horwitz MD , Edina Wang MD , Chris R. Kelsey MD
{"title":"Long-Term Toxicity after Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens Using Total Body Irradiation","authors":"Pranalee Patel MD , Zihan Wan MS , Mairead Dillon BS , Donna Niedzwiecki PhD , Kerri-Anne Crowell MPH , Mitchell E. Horwitz MD , Edina Wang MD , Chris R. Kelsey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate long-term health risks after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using non-myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>All adult patients undergoing non-myeloablative allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning from 1995 to 2020 at our institution were included. Long-term toxicities, defined as events persisting beyond or occurring after 6 months from the date of transplant, were graded per the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A competing risk analysis was performed to assess the risk of developing long-term toxicities within major organ systems using the Fine-Gray model. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of patients undergoing myeloablative TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 174 patients undergoing nonmyeloablative HSCT were assessed along with 378 myeloablative patients. Nonmyeloablative recipients were older (58 vs 43 years, <em>P</em> < .001), less likely to be transplanted for acute leukemia (35% vs 64%, <em>P</em> < .001), more likely to be transplanted for non-malignant conditions (33% vs 11%, <em>P</em> < .001), and were more likely to have used tobacco (33% vs 22%, <em>P</em> = .009). The median follow-up was 7.4 years. The cumulative incidences of long-term toxicities at 5 years for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative patients, taking into account the competing risk of death, were pulmonary (4% vs 4.8%, <em>P</em> > .9), cardiac (6.8% vs 3.3%, <em>P</em> = .11), renal (4.3% vs 4.1%, <em>P</em> = .9), thyroid (3.6% vs 1.5%, <em>P</em> = .2), other endocrine (3.1% vs 8.8%, <em>P</em> = .04), and cataracts (2.5% vs 2.8%, <em>P</em> = .7). The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was 3.5% vs 1.1% (<em>P</em> = .2) between the 2 cohorts. The proportion of all toxicities that were high-grade (3-5) for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative regimens, respectively, were pulmonary (60% and 69%), cardiac (17% and 45%), renal (27% and 21%), and other endocrine (4% and 2%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recipients of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, despite receiving much lower doses of TBI and chemotherapy, are at risk of developing significant, long-term medical conditions comparable with those undergoing myeloablative HSCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 101738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate long-term health risks after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using non-myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI).
Methods and Materials
All adult patients undergoing non-myeloablative allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning from 1995 to 2020 at our institution were included. Long-term toxicities, defined as events persisting beyond or occurring after 6 months from the date of transplant, were graded per the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A competing risk analysis was performed to assess the risk of developing long-term toxicities within major organ systems using the Fine-Gray model. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of patients undergoing myeloablative TBI.
Results
A total of 174 patients undergoing nonmyeloablative HSCT were assessed along with 378 myeloablative patients. Nonmyeloablative recipients were older (58 vs 43 years, P < .001), less likely to be transplanted for acute leukemia (35% vs 64%, P < .001), more likely to be transplanted for non-malignant conditions (33% vs 11%, P < .001), and were more likely to have used tobacco (33% vs 22%, P = .009). The median follow-up was 7.4 years. The cumulative incidences of long-term toxicities at 5 years for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative patients, taking into account the competing risk of death, were pulmonary (4% vs 4.8%, P > .9), cardiac (6.8% vs 3.3%, P = .11), renal (4.3% vs 4.1%, P = .9), thyroid (3.6% vs 1.5%, P = .2), other endocrine (3.1% vs 8.8%, P = .04), and cataracts (2.5% vs 2.8%, P = .7). The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was 3.5% vs 1.1% (P = .2) between the 2 cohorts. The proportion of all toxicities that were high-grade (3-5) for nonmyeloablative and myeloablative regimens, respectively, were pulmonary (60% and 69%), cardiac (17% and 45%), renal (27% and 21%), and other endocrine (4% and 2%).
Conclusions
Recipients of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, despite receiving much lower doses of TBI and chemotherapy, are at risk of developing significant, long-term medical conditions comparable with those undergoing myeloablative HSCT.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.