{"title":"Technology-seeking FDI policy change and local firm innovation","authors":"Pei Wang , Ziliang Deng , Zhan Wu , Vikas Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many emerging market governments have increased technological entry thresholds for foreign newcomers to promote technology transfer to local firms. Although such a policy change intensifies the threat from new foreign entrants in the long run, it protects local firms from intensive competition in the short run. Thus, whether local firms in the same industries will respond to such a policy change with more technological efforts remains to be discovered. We hypothesize that local firms in affected industries will refrain from upward momentum in innovation activities to some extent compared with local firms in industries without such a policy change. We also hypothesize that local firms in more robust resource and market positions will be influenced to a lower degree. Difference-in-difference modeling based on large panel datasets in China supports these hypotheses. This study provides novel insights into the international business literature by identifying that foreign-entry policy shifts may cause indirect effects on the innovation of local firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 102411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125000241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many emerging market governments have increased technological entry thresholds for foreign newcomers to promote technology transfer to local firms. Although such a policy change intensifies the threat from new foreign entrants in the long run, it protects local firms from intensive competition in the short run. Thus, whether local firms in the same industries will respond to such a policy change with more technological efforts remains to be discovered. We hypothesize that local firms in affected industries will refrain from upward momentum in innovation activities to some extent compared with local firms in industries without such a policy change. We also hypothesize that local firms in more robust resource and market positions will be influenced to a lower degree. Difference-in-difference modeling based on large panel datasets in China supports these hypotheses. This study provides novel insights into the international business literature by identifying that foreign-entry policy shifts may cause indirect effects on the innovation of local firms.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.