Valuing ESG: How financial markets respond to corporate sustainability

IF 5.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Le Chau , Le Anh , Vo Duc
{"title":"Valuing ESG: How financial markets respond to corporate sustainability","authors":"Le Chau ,&nbsp;Le Anh ,&nbsp;Vo Duc","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how financial markets value corporate sustainability, using a comprehensive dataset of the largest publicly listed firms across 12 countries. Diverging from prior research that assumes a linear or quadratic relationship between ESG performance and firm value, we uncover a cubic response function, characterised by a horizontal-S-shaped effect. Firm value initially increases with ESG ratings up to a critical threshold, then declines as firms face rising costs and diminishing returns, before rising again once ESG ratings exceed a second threshold. We attribute this nonlinear dynamic to two key mechanisms: growth options and stakeholder influence capacity, which interact at different stages of ESG performance. Furthermore, our analysis highlights the moderating role of country-level institutional quality and environmental sustainability, demonstrating that national contexts significantly shape market responses to ESG ratings. By leveraging the Gaussian Copula approach to address endogeneity concerns, we ensure robust and reliable findings. This study advances the international business literature by offering a theoretical framework to explain cross-country variations in how financial markets price sustainability-linked assets. Our findings underscore the critical role of institutional factors in shaping investor sentiment and corporate strategies in a sustainability-focus global economy. These insights are invaluable for investors, policymakers, and corporate leaders navigating the evolving landscape of ESG-driven finance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 102418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125000319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how financial markets value corporate sustainability, using a comprehensive dataset of the largest publicly listed firms across 12 countries. Diverging from prior research that assumes a linear or quadratic relationship between ESG performance and firm value, we uncover a cubic response function, characterised by a horizontal-S-shaped effect. Firm value initially increases with ESG ratings up to a critical threshold, then declines as firms face rising costs and diminishing returns, before rising again once ESG ratings exceed a second threshold. We attribute this nonlinear dynamic to two key mechanisms: growth options and stakeholder influence capacity, which interact at different stages of ESG performance. Furthermore, our analysis highlights the moderating role of country-level institutional quality and environmental sustainability, demonstrating that national contexts significantly shape market responses to ESG ratings. By leveraging the Gaussian Copula approach to address endogeneity concerns, we ensure robust and reliable findings. This study advances the international business literature by offering a theoretical framework to explain cross-country variations in how financial markets price sustainability-linked assets. Our findings underscore the critical role of institutional factors in shaping investor sentiment and corporate strategies in a sustainability-focus global economy. These insights are invaluable for investors, policymakers, and corporate leaders navigating the evolving landscape of ESG-driven finance.
重视ESG:金融市场对企业可持续性的反应
本研究利用12个国家最大的上市公司的综合数据集,探讨了金融市场如何评估企业的可持续性。与先前假设ESG绩效与公司价值之间存在线性或二次关系的研究不同,我们发现了一个以水平s形效应为特征的三次响应函数。公司价值最初随着ESG评级达到一个关键阈值而增加,然后随着公司面临成本上升和收益递减而下降,一旦ESG评级超过第二个阈值,公司价值就会再次上升。我们将这种非线性动态归因于两个关键机制:成长选择和利益相关者影响能力,它们在ESG绩效的不同阶段相互作用。此外,我们的分析强调了国家层面的制度质量和环境可持续性的调节作用,表明国家背景显著影响了市场对ESG评级的反应。通过利用高斯Copula方法来解决内生性问题,我们确保了稳健和可靠的发现。本研究通过提供一个理论框架来解释金融市场如何为可持续性相关资产定价的跨国差异,从而推动了国际商业文献的发展。我们的研究结果强调了在以可持续发展为重点的全球经济中,制度因素在塑造投资者情绪和企业战略方面的关键作用。这些见解对于投资者、政策制定者和企业领导者在esg驱动的金融不断变化的环境中导航是非常宝贵的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信