CyberROAD: A cybersecurity risk assessment ontology for automotive domain aligned with ISO/SAE 21434:2021

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Karim Khalil , Christian Gehrmann , Günther Vogel
{"title":"CyberROAD: A cybersecurity risk assessment ontology for automotive domain aligned with ISO/SAE 21434:2021","authors":"Karim Khalil ,&nbsp;Christian Gehrmann ,&nbsp;Günther Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The automotive domain is becoming increasingly complex through the integration of new technologies. As a result, cybersecurity is recognized as a pressing issue. This study focuses on the ISO/SAE 21434:2021 standard for road vehicles cybersecurity engineering, evaluating the effectiveness of the standard’s risk assessment approach. The standard suggests a set of assessment steps, and previous research has shown that practitioners often face challenges during assessment execution. The absence of clear, structured guidelines within the standard leads to different interpretations, resulting in inconsistent assessment approaches. This inconsistency makes it difficult to compare and measure the quality of the assessments. Our study uses design science methodology to create a new cybersecurity risk assessment ontology in the automotive domain, describing the relationships and interdependencies between cybersecurity risk assessment activities, stakeholders, and work packages. The ontology model is evaluated in a case study at a leading automotive systems supplier to validate the model’s suitability for developing a cybersecurity risk assessment method. The findings indicate that the ontology model provides an improved understanding of the underlying risk assessment activities and allows for a structured method for extracting procedural steps according to the standard. This systematic approach increases the cybersecurity risk assessment conformity and the consistency of assessment results. In conclusion, this paper gives valuable insights and actionable recommendations for stakeholders, researchers, and organizations seeking to improve the cybersecurity risk assessment process in the automotive domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104015"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212625000535","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The automotive domain is becoming increasingly complex through the integration of new technologies. As a result, cybersecurity is recognized as a pressing issue. This study focuses on the ISO/SAE 21434:2021 standard for road vehicles cybersecurity engineering, evaluating the effectiveness of the standard’s risk assessment approach. The standard suggests a set of assessment steps, and previous research has shown that practitioners often face challenges during assessment execution. The absence of clear, structured guidelines within the standard leads to different interpretations, resulting in inconsistent assessment approaches. This inconsistency makes it difficult to compare and measure the quality of the assessments. Our study uses design science methodology to create a new cybersecurity risk assessment ontology in the automotive domain, describing the relationships and interdependencies between cybersecurity risk assessment activities, stakeholders, and work packages. The ontology model is evaluated in a case study at a leading automotive systems supplier to validate the model’s suitability for developing a cybersecurity risk assessment method. The findings indicate that the ontology model provides an improved understanding of the underlying risk assessment activities and allows for a structured method for extracting procedural steps according to the standard. This systematic approach increases the cybersecurity risk assessment conformity and the consistency of assessment results. In conclusion, this paper gives valuable insights and actionable recommendations for stakeholders, researchers, and organizations seeking to improve the cybersecurity risk assessment process in the automotive domain.
CyberROAD:符合ISO/SAE 21434:2021标准的汽车领域网络安全风险评估本体
通过新技术的集成,汽车领域正变得越来越复杂。因此,网络安全被认为是一个紧迫的问题。本研究的重点是道路车辆网络安全工程的ISO/SAE 21434:2021标准,评估该标准风险评估方法的有效性。该标准提出了一套评估步骤,以前的研究表明,从业者在评估执行过程中经常面临挑战。由于在标准中缺乏明确的、结构化的指导方针,导致不同的解释,导致评估方法不一致。这种不一致使得比较和衡量评估的质量变得困难。我们的研究使用设计科学方法在汽车领域创建了一个新的网络安全风险评估本体,描述了网络安全风险评估活动、利益相关者和工作包之间的关系和相互依赖关系。在一家领先的汽车系统供应商的案例研究中,对本体模型进行了评估,以验证该模型是否适合开发网络安全风险评估方法。研究结果表明,本体模型提供了对潜在风险评估活动的更好理解,并允许根据标准提取程序步骤的结构化方法。这种系统化的方法提高了网络安全风险评估的一致性和评估结果的一致性。总之,本文为寻求改进汽车领域网络安全风险评估流程的利益相关者、研究人员和组织提供了有价值的见解和可操作的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Journal of Information Security and Applications Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
206
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Information Security and Applications (JISA) focuses on the original research and practice-driven applications with relevance to information security and applications. JISA provides a common linkage between a vibrant scientific and research community and industry professionals by offering a clear view on modern problems and challenges in information security, as well as identifying promising scientific and "best-practice" solutions. JISA issues offer a balance between original research work and innovative industrial approaches by internationally renowned information security experts and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信