Racialized Economic Segregation and Disparities in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Care and Outcomes

Pratibha Shrestha MPH, PhD , Min Lian MD, PhD , James Struthers BA , Oumarou Nabi PhD , Bayu B. Bekele MPH, PhD , Benjamin Kozower MD , Maria Baggstrom MD , Ying Liu MD, PhD
{"title":"Racialized Economic Segregation and Disparities in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Care and Outcomes","authors":"Pratibha Shrestha MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Min Lian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;James Struthers BA ,&nbsp;Oumarou Nabi PhD ,&nbsp;Bayu B. Bekele MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Kozower MD ,&nbsp;Maria Baggstrom MD ,&nbsp;Ying Liu MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about the impact of residential segregation on early detection, treatment, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a predominant type of lung cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Does racialized economic segregation play a role in NSCLC treatment and outcomes and contribute to racial disparities?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This study included non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set. County-level racialized economic segregation was estimated by using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE). Multilevel logistic regression and multilevel Cox regression accounting for county-level clustering were used to estimate ORs for late-stage diagnosis and treatment underutilization, and hazard ratios (HRs) were used for mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 203,441 patients, 85.8% were NHW, and 14.2% were NHB. Compared with patients living in the counties with the highest concentration of high-income NHW households (lowest ICE quintile), patients living in the counties with the highest concentration of low-income NHB households (highest ICE quintile) had higher risks of late-stage diagnosis (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16; <em>P</em><sub>trend</sub> &lt; .001), underutilization of guideline-recommended treatment (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41; <em>P</em><sub>trend</sub> &lt; .0001), lung cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14; <em>P</em><sub>trend</sub> &lt; .0001), and overall mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.16; <em>P</em><sub>trend</sub> &lt; .0001). The association between segregation and treatment underutilization was stronger in NHW patients than in NHB patients (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub> = .02). There was no significant difference in the segregation-related risk of late-stage diagnosis, lung cancer-specific mortality, or overall mortality between NHW and NHB patients.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Living in segregated, low-income counties with predominately NHB residents has adverse impacts on early detection, treatment, and outcomes of NSCLC. However, residential segregation did not explain the excess risks of NSCLC care underutilization and mortality in NHB patients compared with NHW patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the impact of residential segregation on early detection, treatment, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a predominant type of lung cancers.

Research Question

Does racialized economic segregation play a role in NSCLC treatment and outcomes and contribute to racial disparities?

Study Design and Methods

This study included non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set. County-level racialized economic segregation was estimated by using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE). Multilevel logistic regression and multilevel Cox regression accounting for county-level clustering were used to estimate ORs for late-stage diagnosis and treatment underutilization, and hazard ratios (HRs) were used for mortality.

Results

Of 203,441 patients, 85.8% were NHW, and 14.2% were NHB. Compared with patients living in the counties with the highest concentration of high-income NHW households (lowest ICE quintile), patients living in the counties with the highest concentration of low-income NHB households (highest ICE quintile) had higher risks of late-stage diagnosis (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16; Ptrend < .001), underutilization of guideline-recommended treatment (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41; Ptrend < .0001), lung cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14; Ptrend < .0001), and overall mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.16; Ptrend < .0001). The association between segregation and treatment underutilization was stronger in NHW patients than in NHB patients (Pinteraction = .02). There was no significant difference in the segregation-related risk of late-stage diagnosis, lung cancer-specific mortality, or overall mortality between NHW and NHB patients.

Interpretation

Living in segregated, low-income counties with predominately NHB residents has adverse impacts on early detection, treatment, and outcomes of NSCLC. However, residential segregation did not explain the excess risks of NSCLC care underutilization and mortality in NHB patients compared with NHW patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信