{"title":"Survey of management of ankle fracture blisters in Yorkshire among orthopaedic surgeons","authors":"Praise Kess Briggs , Jeevith Shetty Sowkoor , Adnan Abdulmajeed Faraj","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The management of ankle fracture blisters is contentious. This study aims to evaluate the management of ankle fracture blisters among orthopedic surgeons in Yorkshire and establish a consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire was distributed among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, to gain insight into their management of ankle fracture blisters. Responses were processed in Excel spreadsheet, chi-squared analysis was done, comparing the responses of foot and ankle surgeons with other orthopaedic surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 69 respondents (58 % of whom were consultants, 7 % associate specialists and 35 % registrars) out of 125 surgeons invited to participate (55.2 % response rate). 17 were foot and ankle surgeons. For most respondents, the type of blister (haemorrhagic or serosanguinous) does not affect decision around timing of surgery. 76 % say that blister location affects the placement of skin incision. 19 % would make their skin incisions irrespective of blister location and 5 % had variable responses to this. 43 surgeons would defer the surgical fixation of the fracture if the blister were at the incision site, while 22 (32 %) would defer surgery if blister is extensive, but not as incision site. If surgery is deferred because of the blister, 52 % will wait till skin creases return while others would wait a variable period. While waiting, 67 % would immobilize with a plaster cast if appropriate, 56 % would use an external fixator. 65 % think that blisters increase the risk of infection, however, 97 % will not prescribe any systemic antibiotics for ankle fracture blisters. The most preferred dressing for blisters is Inadine and Mepitel.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Majority of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire consider ankle fracture blisters to be significant in determining the management of patients with ankle fractures; however significantly more foot and ankle surgeons opine that blisters should not cause delay in definitive fixation of ankle fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 102955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The management of ankle fracture blisters is contentious. This study aims to evaluate the management of ankle fracture blisters among orthopedic surgeons in Yorkshire and establish a consensus.
Methods
A questionnaire was distributed among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, to gain insight into their management of ankle fracture blisters. Responses were processed in Excel spreadsheet, chi-squared analysis was done, comparing the responses of foot and ankle surgeons with other orthopaedic surgeons.
Results
There were 69 respondents (58 % of whom were consultants, 7 % associate specialists and 35 % registrars) out of 125 surgeons invited to participate (55.2 % response rate). 17 were foot and ankle surgeons. For most respondents, the type of blister (haemorrhagic or serosanguinous) does not affect decision around timing of surgery. 76 % say that blister location affects the placement of skin incision. 19 % would make their skin incisions irrespective of blister location and 5 % had variable responses to this. 43 surgeons would defer the surgical fixation of the fracture if the blister were at the incision site, while 22 (32 %) would defer surgery if blister is extensive, but not as incision site. If surgery is deferred because of the blister, 52 % will wait till skin creases return while others would wait a variable period. While waiting, 67 % would immobilize with a plaster cast if appropriate, 56 % would use an external fixator. 65 % think that blisters increase the risk of infection, however, 97 % will not prescribe any systemic antibiotics for ankle fracture blisters. The most preferred dressing for blisters is Inadine and Mepitel.
Conclusion
Majority of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire consider ankle fracture blisters to be significant in determining the management of patients with ankle fractures; however significantly more foot and ankle surgeons opine that blisters should not cause delay in definitive fixation of ankle fractures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.