Survey of management of ankle fracture blisters in Yorkshire among orthopaedic surgeons

Q2 Medicine
Praise Kess Briggs , Jeevith Shetty Sowkoor , Adnan Abdulmajeed Faraj
{"title":"Survey of management of ankle fracture blisters in Yorkshire among orthopaedic surgeons","authors":"Praise Kess Briggs ,&nbsp;Jeevith Shetty Sowkoor ,&nbsp;Adnan Abdulmajeed Faraj","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The management of ankle fracture blisters is contentious. This study aims to evaluate the management of ankle fracture blisters among orthopedic surgeons in Yorkshire and establish a consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire was distributed among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, to gain insight into their management of ankle fracture blisters. Responses were processed in Excel spreadsheet, chi-squared analysis was done, comparing the responses of foot and ankle surgeons with other orthopaedic surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 69 respondents (58 % of whom were consultants, 7 % associate specialists and 35 % registrars) out of 125 surgeons invited to participate (55.2 % response rate). 17 were foot and ankle surgeons. For most respondents, the type of blister (haemorrhagic or serosanguinous) does not affect decision around timing of surgery. 76 % say that blister location affects the placement of skin incision. 19 % would make their skin incisions irrespective of blister location and 5 % had variable responses to this. 43 surgeons would defer the surgical fixation of the fracture if the blister were at the incision site, while 22 (32 %) would defer surgery if blister is extensive, but not as incision site. If surgery is deferred because of the blister, 52 % will wait till skin creases return while others would wait a variable period. While waiting, 67 % would immobilize with a plaster cast if appropriate, 56 % would use an external fixator. 65 % think that blisters increase the risk of infection, however, 97 % will not prescribe any systemic antibiotics for ankle fracture blisters. The most preferred dressing for blisters is Inadine and Mepitel.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Majority of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire consider ankle fracture blisters to be significant in determining the management of patients with ankle fractures; however significantly more foot and ankle surgeons opine that blisters should not cause delay in definitive fixation of ankle fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 102955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The management of ankle fracture blisters is contentious. This study aims to evaluate the management of ankle fracture blisters among orthopedic surgeons in Yorkshire and establish a consensus.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, to gain insight into their management of ankle fracture blisters. Responses were processed in Excel spreadsheet, chi-squared analysis was done, comparing the responses of foot and ankle surgeons with other orthopaedic surgeons.

Results

There were 69 respondents (58 % of whom were consultants, 7 % associate specialists and 35 % registrars) out of 125 surgeons invited to participate (55.2 % response rate). 17 were foot and ankle surgeons. For most respondents, the type of blister (haemorrhagic or serosanguinous) does not affect decision around timing of surgery. 76 % say that blister location affects the placement of skin incision. 19 % would make their skin incisions irrespective of blister location and 5 % had variable responses to this. 43 surgeons would defer the surgical fixation of the fracture if the blister were at the incision site, while 22 (32 %) would defer surgery if blister is extensive, but not as incision site. If surgery is deferred because of the blister, 52 % will wait till skin creases return while others would wait a variable period. While waiting, 67 % would immobilize with a plaster cast if appropriate, 56 % would use an external fixator. 65 % think that blisters increase the risk of infection, however, 97 % will not prescribe any systemic antibiotics for ankle fracture blisters. The most preferred dressing for blisters is Inadine and Mepitel.

Conclusion

Majority of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Yorkshire consider ankle fracture blisters to be significant in determining the management of patients with ankle fractures; however significantly more foot and ankle surgeons opine that blisters should not cause delay in definitive fixation of ankle fractures.

Abstract Image

约克郡骨科医生踝关节骨折水疱处理的调查
踝关节骨折水疱的治疗存在争议。本研究旨在评估踝关节骨折水疱的管理骨科医生在约克郡和建立共识。方法对英国约克郡骨科医生进行问卷调查,了解他们对踝关节骨折水疱的处理情况。用Excel表格对反馈进行处理,并进行卡方分析,比较足、踝外科医生与其他骨科医生的反馈。结果125名外科医生被邀请参与调查,共获得69名回答者(58%为会诊医师,7%为副专科医师,35%为注册医师),回答率为55.2%。17名是足部和踝关节外科医生。对于大多数应答者来说,水疱的类型(出血性或浆液性)并不影响手术时机的决定。76%的人认为水疱的位置影响皮肤切口的位置。19%的人会不考虑水泡的位置而进行皮肤切口,5%的人对此有不同的反应。43名外科医生认为,如果水疱位于切口部位,则推迟手术固定;22名(32%)外科医生认为,如果水疱很广泛,但不是切口部位,则推迟手术固定。如果因为水泡而推迟手术,52%的人会等到皮肤折痕复发,而其他人会等待一个可变的时间。在等待期间,67%的患者会在适当的情况下使用石膏固定,56%的患者会使用外固定架。65%的医生认为水泡会增加感染的风险,然而,97%的医生不会为脚踝骨折水泡开任何全身抗生素。治疗水泡最常用的敷料是茚和美必得。结论大部分约克郡的骨科医生认为踝关节骨折的水泡是决定踝关节骨折患者处理的重要因素;然而,更多的足部和踝关节外科医生认为水疱不应导致踝关节骨折的最终固定延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信