Evaluation of performance of the Still Activity Score for assessment of Adult-onset Still's Disease: Comparative study with Systemic Feature Score and Modified Pouchot-Activity Score

Emine Uslu , Müçteba Enes Yayla , Didem Şahin-Eroğlu , Büşra Atmaca-Haktaniyan , Nilgün Göveç-Giynaş , Recep Yilmaz , Ahmet İlbay , Abdulbaki Gaydan , Yeter Mahmutoğlu , Ahmet Usta , Tahsin Murat Turgaya , Gülay Kinikli , Aşkın Ateş
{"title":"Evaluation of performance of the Still Activity Score for assessment of Adult-onset Still's Disease: Comparative study with Systemic Feature Score and Modified Pouchot-Activity Score","authors":"Emine Uslu ,&nbsp;Müçteba Enes Yayla ,&nbsp;Didem Şahin-Eroğlu ,&nbsp;Büşra Atmaca-Haktaniyan ,&nbsp;Nilgün Göveç-Giynaş ,&nbsp;Recep Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Ahmet İlbay ,&nbsp;Abdulbaki Gaydan ,&nbsp;Yeter Mahmutoğlu ,&nbsp;Ahmet Usta ,&nbsp;Tahsin Murat Turgaya ,&nbsp;Gülay Kinikli ,&nbsp;Aşkın Ateş","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2025.501814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><div>Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder. There is no definitive AOSD activity indicator. Two of the currently used disease activity scores are the Modified Pouchot Activity Score (mPoS), and Systemic Feature Score (SFS). Another scoring system has been recently introduced, named the Still Activity Score (SAS).</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>In this single-center cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare the performance of the SAS with the mPoS and SFS, both of which have been used for a long time for measuring disease activity in patients with AOSD.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>69 patients aged 18 or older were screened in the study who attended the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine between 2010 and 2020 with a diagnosis of AOSD. We compared SAS, SFS and mPoS with physician global assessment (PhGA) in patients with AOSD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 69 patients screened, 45 patients with AOSD who fulfilled the Yamaguchi criteria were analyzed. The results showed no significant difference in SAS between patients with PhGA<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->6 and PhGA<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->6, but mPoS and SFS scores were higher in the PhGA<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->6 group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.053, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007, respectively). There was a significant correlation between mPoS and PhGA (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first study to evaluate the SAS score, which is used for patients with AOSD. SAS is user-friendly but may not be as sensitive as mPoS and SFS for assessing disease activity in AOSD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":"21 2","pages":"Article 501814"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574325000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds

Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder. There is no definitive AOSD activity indicator. Two of the currently used disease activity scores are the Modified Pouchot Activity Score (mPoS), and Systemic Feature Score (SFS). Another scoring system has been recently introduced, named the Still Activity Score (SAS).

Aims

In this single-center cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare the performance of the SAS with the mPoS and SFS, both of which have been used for a long time for measuring disease activity in patients with AOSD.

Method

69 patients aged 18 or older were screened in the study who attended the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine between 2010 and 2020 with a diagnosis of AOSD. We compared SAS, SFS and mPoS with physician global assessment (PhGA) in patients with AOSD.

Results

Of 69 patients screened, 45 patients with AOSD who fulfilled the Yamaguchi criteria were analyzed. The results showed no significant difference in SAS between patients with PhGA < 6 and PhGA  6, but mPoS and SFS scores were higher in the PhGA  6 group (p = 0.053, p = 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). There was a significant correlation between mPoS and PhGA (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the SAS score, which is used for patients with AOSD. SAS is user-friendly but may not be as sensitive as mPoS and SFS for assessing disease activity in AOSD.
Still活动评分在成人发病Still病评估中的应用:与系统特征评分和改良袋活动评分的比较研究
成人发病的斯蒂尔氏病(AOSD)是一种全身性炎症性疾病。没有明确的AOSD活动指标。目前使用的两种疾病活动度评分是改良袋chot活动评分(mPoS)和系统特征评分(SFS)。最近引入了另一个评分系统,称为静止活动评分(SAS)。在这项单中心横断面研究中,我们的目的是比较SAS与mPoS和SFS的性能,这两种方法长期以来一直用于测量AOSD患者的疾病活动性。方法筛选2010年至2020年期间在安卡拉大学医学院就诊的69例18岁及以上的AOSD患者。我们比较了SAS、SFS和mPoS与AOSD患者的医师整体评估(PhGA)。结果69例AOSD患者中,45例符合Yamaguchi标准。结果显示,PhGA和lt患者的SAS无显著差异;PhGA≥6组和PhGA≥6组的mPoS和SFS评分较高(p = 0.053, p = 0.001, p = 0.007)。mPoS与PhGA有显著相关性(p = 0.018)。结论本研究首次评价了用于AOSD患者的SAS评分。SAS是用户友好的,但在评估AOSD的疾病活动性方面可能不如mPoS和SFS敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信