Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Wenchi Li , Shuyue Sheng , Feng Zhu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wenchi Li ,&nbsp;Shuyue Sheng ,&nbsp;Feng Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P &lt; 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 109302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825000519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.

Methods

Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.

Results

The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).

Conclusion

Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信