Best evidence topic: implante valvular aórtico transcatéter en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave asintomática

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Elio Martín Gutiérrez , Pasquale Maiorano , Laura Castillo Pardo , Blanca Meana Fernández , Belén Ramos Barragán , Javier Gualis Cardona , Mario Castaño Ruiz , José Manuel Martínez Comendador , José Manuel Garrido Jiménez
{"title":"Best evidence topic: implante valvular aórtico transcatéter en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave asintomática","authors":"Elio Martín Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Pasquale Maiorano ,&nbsp;Laura Castillo Pardo ,&nbsp;Blanca Meana Fernández ,&nbsp;Belén Ramos Barragán ,&nbsp;Javier Gualis Cardona ,&nbsp;Mario Castaño Ruiz ,&nbsp;José Manuel Martínez Comendador ,&nbsp;José Manuel Garrido Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the most frequent option for severe aortic stenosis treatment. Patients with severe aortic stenosis may present an increased risk of mortality in the asymptomatic phase. Furthermore, the progression of their heart disease may have prognostic implications. It is proposed to carry out a bibliographic review to assess the benefit of TAVI in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search in Pubmed and Cochrane was conducted, identifying comparative studies on surgery and/or TAVI versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients. Thus, an algorithm of better management of patients with severe aortic stenosis would be developed according to the available evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the selection of papers and elimination of duplicates, 34 studies were full-text analyzed, among which we remark: 6 meta-analyses, 4 reviews, 14 original articles and 4 ongoing clinical trials were identified. Early surgery was unanimously superior to conservative management in terms of survival. In the case of TAVI, two studies demonstrated a better prognosis for asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients when their valve disease was corrected with TAVI, and a sub-analysis of the Evolut Low Risk trial demonstrated superior survival results for TAVI compared to surgery and conservative treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the absence of a solid evidence, TAVI can be considered a valid treatment alternative for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, although this indication relies on indirect evidence. More research is needed in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the most frequent option for severe aortic stenosis treatment. Patients with severe aortic stenosis may present an increased risk of mortality in the asymptomatic phase. Furthermore, the progression of their heart disease may have prognostic implications. It is proposed to carry out a bibliographic review to assess the benefit of TAVI in this context.

Methods

A systematic search in Pubmed and Cochrane was conducted, identifying comparative studies on surgery and/or TAVI versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients. Thus, an algorithm of better management of patients with severe aortic stenosis would be developed according to the available evidence.

Results

After the selection of papers and elimination of duplicates, 34 studies were full-text analyzed, among which we remark: 6 meta-analyses, 4 reviews, 14 original articles and 4 ongoing clinical trials were identified. Early surgery was unanimously superior to conservative management in terms of survival. In the case of TAVI, two studies demonstrated a better prognosis for asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients when their valve disease was corrected with TAVI, and a sub-analysis of the Evolut Low Risk trial demonstrated superior survival results for TAVI compared to surgery and conservative treatment.

Conclusions

In the absence of a solid evidence, TAVI can be considered a valid treatment alternative for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, although this indication relies on indirect evidence. More research is needed in this field.
最佳临床证据:无症状严重主动脉狭窄患者的经传主动脉瓣膜植入物
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为严重主动脉瓣狭窄治疗中最常见的选择。严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者在无症状期死亡风险增加。此外,他们心脏病的进展可能具有预后意义。在此背景下,建议进行文献综述,以评估TAVI的效益。方法在Pubmed和Cochrane进行系统检索,确定手术和/或TAVI与保守治疗无症状患者的比较研究。因此,根据现有证据,可以开发出一种更好地管理严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的算法。结果在选择论文并消除重复后,对34项研究进行了全文分析,其中我们发现:6项meta分析,4篇综述,14篇原创文章和4项正在进行的临床试验。在生存率方面,早期手术一致优于保守治疗。在TAVI的病例中,两项研究表明,与有症状的患者相比,无症状患者在用TAVI矫正瓣膜疾病时预后更好,Evolut低风险试验的一项亚分析表明,与手术和保守治疗相比,TAVI的生存结果更好。结论在缺乏确凿证据的情况下,TAVI可以被认为是无症状主动脉狭窄患者的一种有效的治疗选择,尽管这一适应症依赖于间接证据。在这个领域需要做更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
109
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信