Best evidence topic: implante valvular aórtico transcatéter en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave asintomática

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Elio Martín Gutiérrez , Pasquale Maiorano , Laura Castillo Pardo , Blanca Meana Fernández , Belén Ramos Barragán , Javier Gualis Cardona , Mario Castaño Ruiz , José Manuel Martínez Comendador , José Manuel Garrido Jiménez
{"title":"Best evidence topic: implante valvular aórtico transcatéter en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave asintomática","authors":"Elio Martín Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Pasquale Maiorano ,&nbsp;Laura Castillo Pardo ,&nbsp;Blanca Meana Fernández ,&nbsp;Belén Ramos Barragán ,&nbsp;Javier Gualis Cardona ,&nbsp;Mario Castaño Ruiz ,&nbsp;José Manuel Martínez Comendador ,&nbsp;José Manuel Garrido Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the most frequent option for severe aortic stenosis treatment. Patients with severe aortic stenosis may present an increased risk of mortality in the asymptomatic phase. Furthermore, the progression of their heart disease may have prognostic implications. It is proposed to carry out a bibliographic review to assess the benefit of TAVI in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search in Pubmed and Cochrane was conducted, identifying comparative studies on surgery and/or TAVI versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients. Thus, an algorithm of better management of patients with severe aortic stenosis would be developed according to the available evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the selection of papers and elimination of duplicates, 34 studies were full-text analyzed, among which we remark: 6 meta-analyses, 4 reviews, 14 original articles and 4 ongoing clinical trials were identified. Early surgery was unanimously superior to conservative management in terms of survival. In the case of TAVI, two studies demonstrated a better prognosis for asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients when their valve disease was corrected with TAVI, and a sub-analysis of the Evolut Low Risk trial demonstrated superior survival results for TAVI compared to surgery and conservative treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the absence of a solid evidence, TAVI can be considered a valid treatment alternative for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, although this indication relies on indirect evidence. More research is needed in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the most frequent option for severe aortic stenosis treatment. Patients with severe aortic stenosis may present an increased risk of mortality in the asymptomatic phase. Furthermore, the progression of their heart disease may have prognostic implications. It is proposed to carry out a bibliographic review to assess the benefit of TAVI in this context.

Methods

A systematic search in Pubmed and Cochrane was conducted, identifying comparative studies on surgery and/or TAVI versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients. Thus, an algorithm of better management of patients with severe aortic stenosis would be developed according to the available evidence.

Results

After the selection of papers and elimination of duplicates, 34 studies were full-text analyzed, among which we remark: 6 meta-analyses, 4 reviews, 14 original articles and 4 ongoing clinical trials were identified. Early surgery was unanimously superior to conservative management in terms of survival. In the case of TAVI, two studies demonstrated a better prognosis for asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients when their valve disease was corrected with TAVI, and a sub-analysis of the Evolut Low Risk trial demonstrated superior survival results for TAVI compared to surgery and conservative treatment.

Conclusions

In the absence of a solid evidence, TAVI can be considered a valid treatment alternative for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, although this indication relies on indirect evidence. More research is needed in this field.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
109
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信