Cannabis legalization and increasing cannabis use in the United States: Data from urine toxicology testing in emergency room patients

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
David S. Fink , Hillary Samples , Carol A. Malte , Mark Olfson , Melanie M. Wall , Daniel M. Alschuler , Tracy Simpson , Zachary Mannes , Andrew J. Saxon , Deborah S. Hasin
{"title":"Cannabis legalization and increasing cannabis use in the United States: Data from urine toxicology testing in emergency room patients","authors":"David S. Fink ,&nbsp;Hillary Samples ,&nbsp;Carol A. Malte ,&nbsp;Mark Olfson ,&nbsp;Melanie M. Wall ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Alschuler ,&nbsp;Tracy Simpson ,&nbsp;Zachary Mannes ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Saxon ,&nbsp;Deborah S. Hasin","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objectives</h3><div>Rates of cannabis use disorder (CUD) appear to be increasing nationally, with increases greater in states that legalized cannabis use. However, as legalization has progressed and stigma declined, some of these apparent increases could be due to greater willingness of survey respondents and patients to acknowledge cannabis involvement. Biological indicators of cannabis use overcome some concerns about trends denoted by self-report data whose validity is potentially changing over time. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between medical cannabis laws (MCL) and recreational cannabis laws (RCL) and the prevalence of cannabis-positive urine drug screens (UDS) in a large patient sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency department (ED) patients aged 18–75 years with ≥1 ED visit for any reason in a given year from 2008 to 2019 were included. Staggered-adoption difference-in-difference analysis was used to estimate the association between MCL and RCL enactment on cannabis-positive UDS, fitting adjusted linear binomial regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adjusted cannabis-positive UDS prevalences increased from 16.4 % to 25.6 % in states with no cannabis law, 16.6 % to 27.6 % in MCL-only-enacting states, and 18.2 % to 33.8 % in RCL-enacting states. MCL-only and RCL enactment was associated with a 0.8 % (95 % CI, 0.4–1.0) and 2.9 % (95 % CI, 2.5–3.3) increase in prevalence of cannabis-positive UDS, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MCL and RCL enactment played a significant role in the overall increases in cannabis-positive UDS among ED patients. The increase in a biological measure of cannabis use helps reduce concerns about reporting bias as cannabis becomes increasingly legalized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives

Rates of cannabis use disorder (CUD) appear to be increasing nationally, with increases greater in states that legalized cannabis use. However, as legalization has progressed and stigma declined, some of these apparent increases could be due to greater willingness of survey respondents and patients to acknowledge cannabis involvement. Biological indicators of cannabis use overcome some concerns about trends denoted by self-report data whose validity is potentially changing over time. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between medical cannabis laws (MCL) and recreational cannabis laws (RCL) and the prevalence of cannabis-positive urine drug screens (UDS) in a large patient sample.

Methods

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency department (ED) patients aged 18–75 years with ≥1 ED visit for any reason in a given year from 2008 to 2019 were included. Staggered-adoption difference-in-difference analysis was used to estimate the association between MCL and RCL enactment on cannabis-positive UDS, fitting adjusted linear binomial regression models.

Results

Adjusted cannabis-positive UDS prevalences increased from 16.4 % to 25.6 % in states with no cannabis law, 16.6 % to 27.6 % in MCL-only-enacting states, and 18.2 % to 33.8 % in RCL-enacting states. MCL-only and RCL enactment was associated with a 0.8 % (95 % CI, 0.4–1.0) and 2.9 % (95 % CI, 2.5–3.3) increase in prevalence of cannabis-positive UDS, respectively.

Conclusions

MCL and RCL enactment played a significant role in the overall increases in cannabis-positive UDS among ED patients. The increase in a biological measure of cannabis use helps reduce concerns about reporting bias as cannabis becomes increasingly legalized.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信