Academic-clinical collaborative partnerships: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of nurse academics, clinicians, and students

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hasan Fehmi Dirik , Menevse Yildirim , Sinem Ozmen , Seyda Seren Intepeler
{"title":"Academic-clinical collaborative partnerships: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of nurse academics, clinicians, and students","authors":"Hasan Fehmi Dirik ,&nbsp;Menevse Yildirim ,&nbsp;Sinem Ozmen ,&nbsp;Seyda Seren Intepeler","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collaborative partnerships are crucial for strengthening nursing education and practice, particularly in rapidly changing healthcare environments. Promoting collaborative academic-clinical partnerships that encourage unity of purpose among partners improves shared decision-making, enhances undergraduate education, and advances patient care. However, further research is required to discover more about the involvement of all partners in academic-service collaborations.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of the study was to identify the barriers to and facilitators of collaboration between nursing faculty and a university hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The study reported here was conducted using a descriptive design within a qualitative methodological framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Interviews were held with 36 participants between January and July 2023. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews (<em>n</em> = 36), which continued until data saturation was achieved. Inductive content analysis was used to interpret data from three groups: academics, clinicians, and students. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were followed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two main themes and seven sub-themes emerged from the interviews, indicating four facilitators of collaboration: “togetherness contributing to development,” “viewing each member as part of the team,” “motivating through constructive feedback,” and “willingness.” Three barriers were identified: “inadequate triad partner interaction,” “planning issues,” and “nursing shortage.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Promoting togetherness, considering all members as integral parts of the team, providing constructive feedback, and encouraging their contributions can facilitate and strengthen successful partnerships. Facilitators can help overcome barriers to planning, staff shortages, and limited interaction by being open to alternative approaches, learning from past experiences, and, use this information to (re)organize educational and clinical processes.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The results indicate how collaboration can be strengthened. This involves maintaining clear and effective communication, close and regular contact between partners, and frequent interaction. Therefore, to ensure the best healthcare processes and education are sustained, it is essential to foster collaboration between partners by implementing these facilitatory practices to overcome barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Patient or public contribution</h3><div>The nurses and students were active in identifying the topics covered during interviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 106674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaborative partnerships are crucial for strengthening nursing education and practice, particularly in rapidly changing healthcare environments. Promoting collaborative academic-clinical partnerships that encourage unity of purpose among partners improves shared decision-making, enhances undergraduate education, and advances patient care. However, further research is required to discover more about the involvement of all partners in academic-service collaborations.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to identify the barriers to and facilitators of collaboration between nursing faculty and a university hospital.

Design

The study reported here was conducted using a descriptive design within a qualitative methodological framework.

Methods

Interviews were held with 36 participants between January and July 2023. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews (n = 36), which continued until data saturation was achieved. Inductive content analysis was used to interpret data from three groups: academics, clinicians, and students. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were followed.

Results

Two main themes and seven sub-themes emerged from the interviews, indicating four facilitators of collaboration: “togetherness contributing to development,” “viewing each member as part of the team,” “motivating through constructive feedback,” and “willingness.” Three barriers were identified: “inadequate triad partner interaction,” “planning issues,” and “nursing shortage.”

Conclusions

Promoting togetherness, considering all members as integral parts of the team, providing constructive feedback, and encouraging their contributions can facilitate and strengthen successful partnerships. Facilitators can help overcome barriers to planning, staff shortages, and limited interaction by being open to alternative approaches, learning from past experiences, and, use this information to (re)organize educational and clinical processes.

Implications

The results indicate how collaboration can be strengthened. This involves maintaining clear and effective communication, close and regular contact between partners, and frequent interaction. Therefore, to ensure the best healthcare processes and education are sustained, it is essential to foster collaboration between partners by implementing these facilitatory practices to overcome barriers.

Patient or public contribution

The nurses and students were active in identifying the topics covered during interviews.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信