Interactions between Vibroacoustic Discomfort and Visual Stimuli: Comparison of Real, 3D and 360 Environments.

Charlotte Scarpa, Toinon Vigier, Gwenaelle Haese, Patrick Le Callet
{"title":"Interactions between Vibroacoustic Discomfort and Visual Stimuli: Comparison of Real, 3D and 360 Environments.","authors":"Charlotte Scarpa, Toinon Vigier, Gwenaelle Haese, Patrick Le Callet","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2025.3549158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The building industry and the design of interior environments are increasingly focusing on the user experience, incorporating sensory analysis to reconsider how office environments can be optimized. New immersive technologies offer significant opportunities for sensory science, enhancing our understanding of human perception and enabling the collection of multi-sensory data under controlled laboratory conditions. While the potential of Virtual Reality (VR) for these types of studies is well recognized, certain limitations still need to be addressed, including the lack of standardized research practices and the challenge of ensuring the simulated environment closely mirrors the real world. In this study, we compare 360° and 3D formats, to real-life settings in order to determine which format offers greater ecological validity for visual perception and immersion. Additionally, we examine the effects of vibroacoustic stimuli with different levels of intensity on perception and cognition of 30 participants. Subjective, physiological and cognitive data was collected throughout the test to tackle the participant's experience. This preliminary study introduces an immersive methodology that leverages advanced techniques to gain deeper insights into multisensory user experience in VR, marking a significant step forward in the optimization of VR for building evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3549158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The building industry and the design of interior environments are increasingly focusing on the user experience, incorporating sensory analysis to reconsider how office environments can be optimized. New immersive technologies offer significant opportunities for sensory science, enhancing our understanding of human perception and enabling the collection of multi-sensory data under controlled laboratory conditions. While the potential of Virtual Reality (VR) for these types of studies is well recognized, certain limitations still need to be addressed, including the lack of standardized research practices and the challenge of ensuring the simulated environment closely mirrors the real world. In this study, we compare 360° and 3D formats, to real-life settings in order to determine which format offers greater ecological validity for visual perception and immersion. Additionally, we examine the effects of vibroacoustic stimuli with different levels of intensity on perception and cognition of 30 participants. Subjective, physiological and cognitive data was collected throughout the test to tackle the participant's experience. This preliminary study introduces an immersive methodology that leverages advanced techniques to gain deeper insights into multisensory user experience in VR, marking a significant step forward in the optimization of VR for building evaluation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信