Facilitators of and barriers to Medicaid investment in electronic consultation services.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie E Kim, Libby Sagara, Alison M DeDent, Delphine S Tuot
{"title":"Facilitators of and barriers to Medicaid investment in electronic consultation services.","authors":"Julie E Kim, Libby Sagara, Alison M DeDent, Delphine S Tuot","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic consultation, or e-consult, programs have enhanced access to specialty care for primary care providers and their patients, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and maintaining cost-effectiveness. In California, there is great variability in access to e-consult programs for low-income patients who rely on Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) for covered benefits. This study aimed to understand MCP facilitators of and barriers to e-consult investment in California.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Interviews conducted with California Medicaid MCPs' leaders to learn about the facilitators of and barriers to investment in e-consult programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were analyzed using content analysis with multistage coding. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework was used to organize facilitator and barrier themes into 4 contexts: outer context (landscape of health care delivery in California), inner context (components within the medical neighborhood), innovation factors (characteristics of e-consult programs), and bridging factors (MCP actions).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve themes emerged from 16 interviews. Outer context themes were regulatory policies and financial policies (barriers), limited specialty care (facilitator), and patient perceptions (both). Inner context themes were workforce characteristics (both), clinical leadership (facilitator), and clinical workflows (both). Innovation factor themes were adjunct e-consult vendor services (both) and software integration (facilitator). Bridging factor themes included collaboration with other plans (facilitator), financial risk delegation (barrier), and quality improvement considerations (facilitator).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid regulatory and reimbursement policies posed the most significant barriers to e-consult investment by Medicaid MCPs in California. Recognition of e-consult as a mode of specialty care delivery and reimbursement for clinicians could help future e-consult programs succeed in enhancing access to specialty expertise for low-income patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 3","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electronic consultation, or e-consult, programs have enhanced access to specialty care for primary care providers and their patients, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and maintaining cost-effectiveness. In California, there is great variability in access to e-consult programs for low-income patients who rely on Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) for covered benefits. This study aimed to understand MCP facilitators of and barriers to e-consult investment in California.

Study design: Interviews conducted with California Medicaid MCPs' leaders to learn about the facilitators of and barriers to investment in e-consult programs.

Methods: Interviews were analyzed using content analysis with multistage coding. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework was used to organize facilitator and barrier themes into 4 contexts: outer context (landscape of health care delivery in California), inner context (components within the medical neighborhood), innovation factors (characteristics of e-consult programs), and bridging factors (MCP actions).

Results: Twelve themes emerged from 16 interviews. Outer context themes were regulatory policies and financial policies (barriers), limited specialty care (facilitator), and patient perceptions (both). Inner context themes were workforce characteristics (both), clinical leadership (facilitator), and clinical workflows (both). Innovation factor themes were adjunct e-consult vendor services (both) and software integration (facilitator). Bridging factor themes included collaboration with other plans (facilitator), financial risk delegation (barrier), and quality improvement considerations (facilitator).

Conclusions: Medicaid regulatory and reimbursement policies posed the most significant barriers to e-consult investment by Medicaid MCPs in California. Recognition of e-consult as a mode of specialty care delivery and reimbursement for clinicians could help future e-consult programs succeed in enhancing access to specialty expertise for low-income patients.

医疗补助计划投资电子咨询服务的促进因素和障碍。
目的:电子咨询或电子咨询项目增加了初级保健提供者及其患者获得专业护理的机会,减少了不必要的亲自就诊并保持了成本效益。在加州,依靠医疗补助管理医疗计划(mcp)获得保险福利的低收入患者在获得电子咨询项目方面存在很大差异。本研究旨在了解加州电子咨询投资的MCP促进因素和障碍。研究设计:对加州医疗补助mcp的领导进行访谈,了解电子咨询项目投资的促进因素和障碍。方法:采用多阶段编码的内容分析方法对访谈进行分析。探索、准备、实施和维持框架用于将促进因素和障碍主题组织为4个上下文:外部上下文(加州医疗保健服务的景观)、内部上下文(医疗社区的组成部分)、创新因素(电子咨询项目的特征)和桥梁因素(MCP行动)。结果:从16个访谈中得出12个主题。外部背景主题是监管政策和金融政策(障碍)、有限的专科护理(促进因素)和患者感知(两者都有)。内部上下文主题是劳动力特征(两者)、临床领导(推动者)和临床工作流程(两者)。创新因素主题是辅助电子咨询供应商服务(两者)和软件集成(促进者)。衔接因素主题包括与其他计划的协作(促进者)、财务风险委托(障碍)和质量改进考虑(促进者)。结论:医疗补助监管和报销政策对加州医疗补助mcp的电子咨询投资构成了最大的障碍。承认电子咨询作为一种专业护理交付模式和临床医生的报销可以帮助未来的电子咨询项目成功地增加低收入患者获得专业知识的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信