The efficacy of combining pulsed radiofrequency with low-temperature continuous radiofrequency for the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chunmei Zhao, Hao Ren, Niti Shrestha, Lan Meng, Ying Shen, Fang Luo
{"title":"The efficacy of combining pulsed radiofrequency with low-temperature continuous radiofrequency for the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Chunmei Zhao, Hao Ren, Niti Shrestha, Lan Meng, Ying Shen, Fang Luo","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS241274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with low-temperature continuous radiofrequency (CRF) might be a novel technique for relieving trigeminal neuralgia (TN). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-voltage PRF combined with low-temperature CRF in primary TN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was performed between December 2, 2020, and October 26, 2022. Eligible patients with TN were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either PRF with a voltage of 70 V at 42°C for 600 seconds followed by CRF at 60°C for 270 seconds (PRF+CRF group) or PRF with a voltage of 70 V at 42°C for 600 seconds (PRF group). The primary outcome was the response rate to treatment after 12 months. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of responders at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months following the procedure and the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following the procedure. Adverse events associated with surgery were also observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 169 patients with TN were screened, and 146 patients were randomized. The groups were well balanced across baseline characteristics. The percentage of responders at 12 months after surgery was significantly greater in the PRF+CRF group compared with the PRF group (83.6% [61/73] vs 67.1% [49/73], risk ratio 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.5], absolute difference 16.5%; p = 0.021). There was a higher proportion of responders after 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months (ratio difference 16.5%, 35.6%, 16.4%, 12.3%, 12.3%, 12.3%, and 15.1%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Moreover, lower NRS scores were observed in the PRF+CRF group at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following the procedure (all p < 0.05). Postoperative facial numbness scores were higher in the PRF+CRF group at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months (all p < 0.05). Overall, 5.5% of patients in the PRF+CRF group and no patients in the PRF group reported masseter muscle weakening. No other complications, such as anesthesia dolorosa and corneal anesthesia, were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-voltage PRF combined with low-temperature (60°C) CRF could provide a significant improvement compared with high-voltage PRF alone. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT04174443 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS241274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with low-temperature continuous radiofrequency (CRF) might be a novel technique for relieving trigeminal neuralgia (TN). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-voltage PRF combined with low-temperature CRF in primary TN.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was performed between December 2, 2020, and October 26, 2022. Eligible patients with TN were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either PRF with a voltage of 70 V at 42°C for 600 seconds followed by CRF at 60°C for 270 seconds (PRF+CRF group) or PRF with a voltage of 70 V at 42°C for 600 seconds (PRF group). The primary outcome was the response rate to treatment after 12 months. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of responders at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months following the procedure and the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following the procedure. Adverse events associated with surgery were also observed.

Results: A total of 169 patients with TN were screened, and 146 patients were randomized. The groups were well balanced across baseline characteristics. The percentage of responders at 12 months after surgery was significantly greater in the PRF+CRF group compared with the PRF group (83.6% [61/73] vs 67.1% [49/73], risk ratio 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.5], absolute difference 16.5%; p = 0.021). There was a higher proportion of responders after 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months (ratio difference 16.5%, 35.6%, 16.4%, 12.3%, 12.3%, 12.3%, and 15.1%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Moreover, lower NRS scores were observed in the PRF+CRF group at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following the procedure (all p < 0.05). Postoperative facial numbness scores were higher in the PRF+CRF group at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months (all p < 0.05). Overall, 5.5% of patients in the PRF+CRF group and no patients in the PRF group reported masseter muscle weakening. No other complications, such as anesthesia dolorosa and corneal anesthesia, were observed in either group.

Conclusions: High-voltage PRF combined with low-temperature (60°C) CRF could provide a significant improvement compared with high-voltage PRF alone. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT04174443 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信