Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00337
Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza, Carlos Barrios, Rafaela Gomes de Jesus, Tomas Reinert, Juliana Giacomazzi, Daniela D Rosa, Eduardo Cronemberger, Gustavo Werutsky, José Bines, Geraldo Silva Queiroz, Vladmir Cordeiro de Lima, Ruffo Freitas-Junior, José d'Oliveira Couto Filho, Karla Emerenciano, Heloisa Resende, Susanne Crocamo, Brigitte Van Eyll, Yeni Neron, Vanessa Dybal, Nicolas Silva Lazaretti, Rita de Cassia Costamilan, Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade, Clarissa Mathias, Giovana Zerwes Vacaro, Giuliano Borges, Alessandra Menezes Morelle, Carlos Alberto Sampaio Filho, Max Mano, Martina Lichtenfels, Sergio D Simon, Andre P Fay
{"title":"Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country.","authors":"Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza, Carlos Barrios, Rafaela Gomes de Jesus, Tomas Reinert, Juliana Giacomazzi, Daniela D Rosa, Eduardo Cronemberger, Gustavo Werutsky, José Bines, Geraldo Silva Queiroz, Vladmir Cordeiro de Lima, Ruffo Freitas-Junior, José d'Oliveira Couto Filho, Karla Emerenciano, Heloisa Resende, Susanne Crocamo, Brigitte Van Eyll, Yeni Neron, Vanessa Dybal, Nicolas Silva Lazaretti, Rita de Cassia Costamilan, Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade, Clarissa Mathias, Giovana Zerwes Vacaro, Giuliano Borges, Alessandra Menezes Morelle, Carlos Alberto Sampaio Filho, Max Mano, Martina Lichtenfels, Sergio D Simon, Andre P Fay","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low rates of germline genetic testing (GGT) for breast cancer (BC) have been reported globally, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we used real-world data to assess the GGT rate for BC in an LMIC and identified barriers to its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2,974 newly diagnosed patients with BC from the AMAZONA III study, the largest Brazilian multicenter, prospective BC cohort. GGT rates were determined for the entire cohort and the high-risk hereditary BC group (HR), defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, between 2019 and 2020. Barriers to GGT performance associated with patient characteristics and health care systems were identified using multivariable Poisson regression model. Values of <i>P</i> < .05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the AMAZONA III cohort, 1,476 (49%) were classified as HR. Genetic counseling was recommended for 521 patients (35% of HR), and 282 (19%) underwent GGT. Notably, 97% of patients with HR treated within the public health care systems and 56% in the private system did not undergo GGT. Age, education, occupation, monthly income, availability of onsite genetic counseling, and treatment at a teaching center were factors associated with GGT uptake (<i>P</i> < .05). Of those tested, 50 (17%) harbored a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 9% of this robust Brazilian BC cohort underwent GGT, highlighting a considerable gap from the current recommendation to test all patients with BC under age 65 years. GGT is underused by patients with HR in both public and private health care systems, with those in the public system being more affected. The disparities and barriers identified emphasize the need for educational interventions and enhanced access to GGT. Prioritizing GGT is critical to improving BC outcomes in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Low rates of germline genetic testing (GGT) for breast cancer (BC) have been reported globally, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we used real-world data to assess the GGT rate for BC in an LMIC and identified barriers to its use.

Methods: We analyzed 2,974 newly diagnosed patients with BC from the AMAZONA III study, the largest Brazilian multicenter, prospective BC cohort. GGT rates were determined for the entire cohort and the high-risk hereditary BC group (HR), defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, between 2019 and 2020. Barriers to GGT performance associated with patient characteristics and health care systems were identified using multivariable Poisson regression model. Values of P < .05 were considered significant.

Results: In the AMAZONA III cohort, 1,476 (49%) were classified as HR. Genetic counseling was recommended for 521 patients (35% of HR), and 282 (19%) underwent GGT. Notably, 97% of patients with HR treated within the public health care systems and 56% in the private system did not undergo GGT. Age, education, occupation, monthly income, availability of onsite genetic counseling, and treatment at a teaching center were factors associated with GGT uptake (P < .05). Of those tested, 50 (17%) harbored a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant.

Conclusion: Only 9% of this robust Brazilian BC cohort underwent GGT, highlighting a considerable gap from the current recommendation to test all patients with BC under age 65 years. GGT is underused by patients with HR in both public and private health care systems, with those in the public system being more affected. The disparities and barriers identified emphasize the need for educational interventions and enhanced access to GGT. Prioritizing GGT is critical to improving BC outcomes in LMICs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信