Assessing Short-Video Dependence for e-Mental Health: Development and Validation Study of the Short-Video Dependence Scale.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AnHang Jiang, Shuang Li, HuaBin Wang, HaoSen Ni, HongAn Chen, JunHong Dai, XueFeng Xu, Mei Li, Guang-Heng Dong
{"title":"Assessing Short-Video Dependence for e-Mental Health: Development and Validation Study of the Short-Video Dependence Scale.","authors":"AnHang Jiang, Shuang Li, HuaBin Wang, HaoSen Ni, HongAn Chen, JunHong Dai, XueFeng Xu, Mei Li, Guang-Heng Dong","doi":"10.2196/66341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-video dependence (SVD) has become a significant mental health issue around the world. The lack of scientific tools to assess SVD hampers further advancement in this area.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a scientific tool to measure SVD levels, ensuring a scientifically determined cutoff point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We initially interviewed 115 highly engaged short-video users aged 15 to 63 years. Based on the summary of the interview and references to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for behavioral addictions, we proposed the first version of the short-video dependence scale (SVDS). We then screened the items through item analysis (second version) and extracted common factors using exploratory factor analysis (third version) and confirmatory factor analysis (final version). Convergent validity was tested with other scales (Chinese Internet Addiction Scale [CIAS] and DSM-5). Finally, we tested the validity of the final version in 16,038 subjects and set the diagnostic cutoff point through latent profile analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the SVDS contained 20 items and 4 dimensions, which showed strong structural validity (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value=0.94) and internal consistency (Cronbach α=.93), and good convergent validity (r<sub>CIAS</sub>=0.61 and r<sub>DSM-5</sub>=0.68), sensitivity (0.77, 0.83, 0.87, and 0.62 for each of the 4 dimensions), and specificity (0.75, 0.87, 0.80, and 0.79 for each of the 4 dimensions). Additionally, an SVDS score of 58 was determined as the best cutoff score, and latent profile analysis identified a 5-class model for SVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a tool to measure SVD levels and established a threshold to differentiate dependent users from highly engaged nondependent users. The findings provide opportunities for further research on the impacts of short-video use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e66341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Short-video dependence (SVD) has become a significant mental health issue around the world. The lack of scientific tools to assess SVD hampers further advancement in this area.

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a scientific tool to measure SVD levels, ensuring a scientifically determined cutoff point.

Methods: We initially interviewed 115 highly engaged short-video users aged 15 to 63 years. Based on the summary of the interview and references to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for behavioral addictions, we proposed the first version of the short-video dependence scale (SVDS). We then screened the items through item analysis (second version) and extracted common factors using exploratory factor analysis (third version) and confirmatory factor analysis (final version). Convergent validity was tested with other scales (Chinese Internet Addiction Scale [CIAS] and DSM-5). Finally, we tested the validity of the final version in 16,038 subjects and set the diagnostic cutoff point through latent profile analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The final version of the SVDS contained 20 items and 4 dimensions, which showed strong structural validity (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value=0.94) and internal consistency (Cronbach α=.93), and good convergent validity (rCIAS=0.61 and rDSM-5=0.68), sensitivity (0.77, 0.83, 0.87, and 0.62 for each of the 4 dimensions), and specificity (0.75, 0.87, 0.80, and 0.79 for each of the 4 dimensions). Additionally, an SVDS score of 58 was determined as the best cutoff score, and latent profile analysis identified a 5-class model for SVD.

Conclusions: We developed a tool to measure SVD levels and established a threshold to differentiate dependent users from highly engaged nondependent users. The findings provide opportunities for further research on the impacts of short-video use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信