Flávia M. P. Costa-Areglado, Gregory M. Ruiz, Frederico P. Brandini
{"title":"Biological invasions via ballast water: evaluating the distribution and gaps in research effort by geography, taxonomic group, and habitat type","authors":"Flávia M. P. Costa-Areglado, Gregory M. Ruiz, Frederico P. Brandini","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2025.1389559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While crucial for maneuverability and safety of commercial ships, ballast water (BW) has long served as a major vector for the distribution of non-native species in coastal ecosystems. Species transfers via shipping can alter community composition, ecosystem function, economies, and human health. In recent decades, a significant body of research has focused on BW, including many <jats:italic>in-situ</jats:italic> studies, but this is unevenly distributed across global regions. Here, we conducted a literature review to evaluate the distribution of published BW studies across geographic regions, taxonomic groups, and habitats, highlighting some current knowledge gaps. Of 2,088 publications on BW in our review, 270 (13%) reported on <jats:italic>in-situ</jats:italic> sampling from ballast tanks across 194 unique geographic locations. For both number of publications and sampling effort, approximately 85% were from the northern hemisphere. Considering planktonic organisms sampled in BW, only 12% of publications were from the southern hemisphere, and no study reported analyses of benthic communities in ballast tanks outside of North America and Europe. While we recognize that our review does not capture all existing data, such as technical reports and regional journals, it provides a relative measure of research effort to date, highlighting the disparity among regions in taxonomic and habitat analyses of ballast communities. In particular, the low frequency of <jats:italic>in-situ</jats:italic> measures for many regions (especially the southern hemisphere) limits current understanding of BW species transfers, including changes over time in response to evolving management and policy across the globe.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1389559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While crucial for maneuverability and safety of commercial ships, ballast water (BW) has long served as a major vector for the distribution of non-native species in coastal ecosystems. Species transfers via shipping can alter community composition, ecosystem function, economies, and human health. In recent decades, a significant body of research has focused on BW, including many in-situ studies, but this is unevenly distributed across global regions. Here, we conducted a literature review to evaluate the distribution of published BW studies across geographic regions, taxonomic groups, and habitats, highlighting some current knowledge gaps. Of 2,088 publications on BW in our review, 270 (13%) reported on in-situ sampling from ballast tanks across 194 unique geographic locations. For both number of publications and sampling effort, approximately 85% were from the northern hemisphere. Considering planktonic organisms sampled in BW, only 12% of publications were from the southern hemisphere, and no study reported analyses of benthic communities in ballast tanks outside of North America and Europe. While we recognize that our review does not capture all existing data, such as technical reports and regional journals, it provides a relative measure of research effort to date, highlighting the disparity among regions in taxonomic and habitat analyses of ballast communities. In particular, the low frequency of in-situ measures for many regions (especially the southern hemisphere) limits current understanding of BW species transfers, including changes over time in response to evolving management and policy across the globe.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide.
With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.