[Bioethics Tools in Decision-Making in the Intensive Care Unit].

Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154
Claudio Castillo, Manuel Ramírez, Cristian Grenett, Víctor Rossel
{"title":"[Bioethics Tools in Decision-Making in the Intensive Care Unit].","authors":"Claudio Castillo, Manuel Ramírez, Cristian Grenett, Víctor Rossel","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working in Critical Care Units (CCU) is of a multidisciplinary, high-complexity nature; thus, collegiate decisions are necessary. Bioethics as a discipline in the context of pluralistic, democratic societies provides us with valuable tools for complex clinical cases. In this article, we propose the Principlism tool (Beauchamp & Childress) combined with the Deliberative Method as a major supporting tool for the resolution of these problems at CCU. Additionally, we complement that view with two other tools that consider psychosocial scope: Jonsen, Siegel Winslade, and Diego Gracia Tools. With the help of these tools, it is possible to solve most clinical cases, avoiding extreme courses of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 11","pages":"1154-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working in Critical Care Units (CCU) is of a multidisciplinary, high-complexity nature; thus, collegiate decisions are necessary. Bioethics as a discipline in the context of pluralistic, democratic societies provides us with valuable tools for complex clinical cases. In this article, we propose the Principlism tool (Beauchamp & Childress) combined with the Deliberative Method as a major supporting tool for the resolution of these problems at CCU. Additionally, we complement that view with two other tools that consider psychosocial scope: Jonsen, Siegel Winslade, and Diego Gracia Tools. With the help of these tools, it is possible to solve most clinical cases, avoiding extreme courses of action.

[生物伦理学工具在重症监护病房的决策]。
在重症监护病房(CCU)工作是一个多学科,高复杂性的性质;因此,集体决策是必要的。生物伦理学作为一门学科,在多元民主社会的背景下,为我们提供了处理复杂临床病例的宝贵工具。在本文中,我们提出原则主义工具(Beauchamp & Childress)结合审议方法作为CCU解决这些问题的主要支持工具。此外,我们用另外两个考虑社会心理范围的工具来补充这一观点:Jonsen, Siegel Winslade和Diego Gracia tools。在这些工具的帮助下,有可能解决大多数临床病例,避免极端的行动方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信