Benchmarking Spatial Co-Localization Methods for Single-Cell Multiplex Imaging Data with Applications to High-Grade Serous Ovarian and Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Alex C Soupir, Ishaan V Gadiyar, Bryan R Helm, Coleman R Harris, Simon N Vandekar, Lauren C Peres, Robert J Coffey, Julia Wrobel, Siyuan Ma, Brooke L Fridley
{"title":"Benchmarking Spatial Co-Localization Methods for Single-Cell Multiplex Imaging Data with Applications to High-Grade Serous Ovarian and Triple Negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Alex C Soupir, Ishaan V Gadiyar, Bryan R Helm, Coleman R Harris, Simon N Vandekar, Lauren C Peres, Robert J Coffey, Julia Wrobel, Siyuan Ma, Brooke L Fridley","doi":"10.1080/29979676.2024.2437947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-cell multiplex imaging (scMI) measures cell locations and phenotypes within a tissue and can be used to understand the tumor microenvironment. In scMI studies, it is often of interest to quantify spatial co-localization of immune cells and its association with clinical outcomes; however, it remains unknown which of the many available spatial indices have adequate power to detect spatial within-sample co-localization and its association with patient outcomes, such as survival. In this study, the performance of six frequentist metrics of spatial co-localization used in scMI studies were evaluated. Simulated data was used to assess the power and type I error of these spatial metrics to detect signficant co-localization. Furthermore, these spatial co-localization methods were applied to two scMI studies - a high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) study and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) study - to detect within-sample co-localization between cell types and their sensitivity to detect differences in survival across samples. In the simulation study, Ripley's <i>K</i> had the greatest power to identify co-localization followed closely by pair correlation <i>g</i>; all other statistics showed little power across all simulation scenarios. In the application of the methods to cancer studies, the results consistently point to pair correlation <i>g</i> and Ripley's <i>K</i> as indices with the most power for detecting significant co-localization in scMI data. Furthermore, pair correlation <i>g</i>, Ripley's <i>K</i>, and the scLMM index were most effective for estimating between-sample associations between level of co-localization and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":520439,"journal":{"name":"Statistics and data science in imaging","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics and data science in imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/29979676.2024.2437947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-cell multiplex imaging (scMI) measures cell locations and phenotypes within a tissue and can be used to understand the tumor microenvironment. In scMI studies, it is often of interest to quantify spatial co-localization of immune cells and its association with clinical outcomes; however, it remains unknown which of the many available spatial indices have adequate power to detect spatial within-sample co-localization and its association with patient outcomes, such as survival. In this study, the performance of six frequentist metrics of spatial co-localization used in scMI studies were evaluated. Simulated data was used to assess the power and type I error of these spatial metrics to detect signficant co-localization. Furthermore, these spatial co-localization methods were applied to two scMI studies - a high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) study and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) study - to detect within-sample co-localization between cell types and their sensitivity to detect differences in survival across samples. In the simulation study, Ripley's K had the greatest power to identify co-localization followed closely by pair correlation g; all other statistics showed little power across all simulation scenarios. In the application of the methods to cancer studies, the results consistently point to pair correlation g and Ripley's K as indices with the most power for detecting significant co-localization in scMI data. Furthermore, pair correlation g, Ripley's K, and the scLMM index were most effective for estimating between-sample associations between level of co-localization and survival.

单细胞多重成像数据的基准空间共定位方法在高级别浆液性卵巢癌和三阴性乳腺癌中的应用。
单细胞多重成像(scMI)测量组织内的细胞位置和表型,可用于了解肿瘤微环境。在scMI研究中,量化免疫细胞的空间共定位及其与临床结果的关系通常是令人感兴趣的;然而,目前尚不清楚在许多可用的空间指数中,哪一个具有足够的能力来检测样本内空间共定位及其与患者预后(如生存)的关联。在本研究中,评估了scMI研究中使用的六个空间共定位频率指标的性能。模拟数据用于评估这些空间度量的功率和I型误差,以检测显著的共定位。此外,这些空间共定位方法被应用于两项scMI研究——一项高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)研究和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)研究——以检测细胞类型之间的样本内共定位及其灵敏度,以检测样本间生存差异。在模拟研究中,Ripley’s K对共定位的识别能力最强,其次是对相关g;所有其他统计数据在所有模拟场景中都显示出很小的能力。在将该方法应用于癌症研究时,结果一致表明配对相关性g和Ripley’s K是在scMI数据中检测显著共定位的最有效指标。此外,配对相关g、Ripley’s K和scLMM指数对于估计共定位水平与生存之间的样本间关联是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信