Arkansas Medical Marijuana Certifications: Higher-Volume Physicians Associated With Less Evidence Of Care Coordination.

Joseph W Thompson, Brad Martin, Anthony Goudie, Nichole Stanley, Katerina Noori, Teresa Hudson
{"title":"Arkansas Medical Marijuana Certifications: Higher-Volume Physicians Associated With Less Evidence Of Care Coordination.","authors":"Joseph W Thompson, Brad Martin, Anthony Goudie, Nichole Stanley, Katerina Noori, Teresa Hudson","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients' access to medical marijuana has dramatically increased despite the lack of Food and Drug Administration approval. In this study, we profiled individuals and the conditions for which they were certified for medical marijuana, and we examined the evidence of coordination with their physicians providing traditional care. Within two years of initiation, medical marijuana was approved for 3.4 percent of Arkansans ages eighteen and older by 12.5 percent of physicians who had an active license in the state. Posttraumatic stress disorder and four pain diagnoses were the most frequent qualifying conditions. We observed care coordination among low-volume certifying physicians, with a majority having both seen and diagnosed the adult with the qualifying conditions. Conversely, seven high-volume certifying physicians, each with more than 1,000 certifications, demonstrated limited contact with those they certified. The Department of Health and Human Services has recommended that marijuana be changed from Schedule I to Schedule III in the Controlled Substances Act, and the Justice Department has submitted a notice of proposed rulemaking to effect this change. Implications include the need to continue research and develop clinical guidelines, notify routine providers of care with potential incorporation of certifications into the health information exchanges, and consider screening for medical marijuana use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 3","pages":"351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients' access to medical marijuana has dramatically increased despite the lack of Food and Drug Administration approval. In this study, we profiled individuals and the conditions for which they were certified for medical marijuana, and we examined the evidence of coordination with their physicians providing traditional care. Within two years of initiation, medical marijuana was approved for 3.4 percent of Arkansans ages eighteen and older by 12.5 percent of physicians who had an active license in the state. Posttraumatic stress disorder and four pain diagnoses were the most frequent qualifying conditions. We observed care coordination among low-volume certifying physicians, with a majority having both seen and diagnosed the adult with the qualifying conditions. Conversely, seven high-volume certifying physicians, each with more than 1,000 certifications, demonstrated limited contact with those they certified. The Department of Health and Human Services has recommended that marijuana be changed from Schedule I to Schedule III in the Controlled Substances Act, and the Justice Department has submitted a notice of proposed rulemaking to effect this change. Implications include the need to continue research and develop clinical guidelines, notify routine providers of care with potential incorporation of certifications into the health information exchanges, and consider screening for medical marijuana use in clinical settings.

阿肯色医用大麻认证:更多的医生与更少的护理协调证据相关。
尽管缺乏美国食品和药物管理局的批准,但患者获得医用大麻的机会大幅增加。在这项研究中,我们对个人及其获得医用大麻认证的条件进行了分析,并检查了他们与提供传统护理的医生合作的证据。在两年的时间里,阿肯色州18岁及以上的人中有3.4%的人被12.5%持有有效执照的医生批准使用医用大麻。创伤后应激障碍和四种疼痛诊断是最常见的合格条件。我们观察了低容量认证医生之间的护理协调,大多数医生都看过并诊断出符合条件的成年人。相反,7名拥有1000多份证书的高容量认证医生与他们所认证的人接触有限。卫生与公众服务部建议将大麻从《管制物质法》的附表1改为附表3,司法部已经提交了一份关于实施这一变化的拟议规则制定的通知。影响包括需要继续研究和制定临床指南,通知常规护理提供者,可能将认证纳入健康信息交流,并考虑在临床环境中筛查医用大麻的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信