Radiological outcomes of two non-surgical management methods for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children: No difference between figure-of-eight bandage and arm sling.
Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Volga Öztürk, Taha Ahmet Türkoğlu, Aytek Hüseyin Çeliksöz, Okan Tezgel, Levent Küçük, Erhan Coşkunol, Kemal Aktuğlu
{"title":"Radiological outcomes of two non-surgical management methods for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children: No difference between figure-of-eight bandage and arm sling.","authors":"Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Volga Öztürk, Taha Ahmet Türkoğlu, Aytek Hüseyin Çeliksöz, Okan Tezgel, Levent Küçük, Erhan Coşkunol, Kemal Aktuğlu","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.29946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although non-surgical management is a commonly used treatment for pediatric clavicle fractures, there is limited data in the literature regarding the most effective method. This study aims to compare the radiological outcomes of the figure-of-eight bandage versus the arm sling in the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on the preferred conservative management method: Group 1 (arm sling) and Group 2 (figure-of-eight bandage). The degree of angulation and shortening was measured at initial admission and during follow-up. Demographic characteristics and radiological data were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 included 10 girls and 10 boys, while Group 2 included 12 girls and 17 boys (p=0.761). The mean shortening at initial presentation was 7.28+-6.06 mm in Group 1 and 6.65+-5.58 mm in Group 2 (p=0.625). At follow-up, the mean shortening was 6.24+-5.59 mm in Group 1 and 5.59+-4.91 mm in Group 2 (p=0.569). The mean angulation at initial presentation was 21.28+-10.05° in Group 1 and 20.41+-12.23° in Group 2 (p=0.752). At follow-up, the mean angulation was 14.45+-9.41° in Group 1 and 11.82+-10.27° in Group 2 (p=0.189). In intra-group comparisons, no significant difference was found between the initial shortening and follow-up shortening in either group (Group 1: p=0.062; Group 2: p=0.190). A significant reduction in angulation was observed in both groups during follow-up (p=0.001 for Group 1; p=0.001 for Group 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiological outcomes of the figure-of-eight bandage and the arm sling in the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children are similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 3","pages":"303-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.29946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although non-surgical management is a commonly used treatment for pediatric clavicle fractures, there is limited data in the literature regarding the most effective method. This study aims to compare the radiological outcomes of the figure-of-eight bandage versus the arm sling in the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children.
Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on the preferred conservative management method: Group 1 (arm sling) and Group 2 (figure-of-eight bandage). The degree of angulation and shortening was measured at initial admission and during follow-up. Demographic characteristics and radiological data were compared between the two groups.
Results: Group 1 included 10 girls and 10 boys, while Group 2 included 12 girls and 17 boys (p=0.761). The mean shortening at initial presentation was 7.28+-6.06 mm in Group 1 and 6.65+-5.58 mm in Group 2 (p=0.625). At follow-up, the mean shortening was 6.24+-5.59 mm in Group 1 and 5.59+-4.91 mm in Group 2 (p=0.569). The mean angulation at initial presentation was 21.28+-10.05° in Group 1 and 20.41+-12.23° in Group 2 (p=0.752). At follow-up, the mean angulation was 14.45+-9.41° in Group 1 and 11.82+-10.27° in Group 2 (p=0.189). In intra-group comparisons, no significant difference was found between the initial shortening and follow-up shortening in either group (Group 1: p=0.062; Group 2: p=0.190). A significant reduction in angulation was observed in both groups during follow-up (p=0.001 for Group 1; p=0.001 for Group 2).
Conclusion: The radiological outcomes of the figure-of-eight bandage and the arm sling in the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures in school-age children are similar.