Global patterns in access and benefit-sharing: a comprehensive review of national policies.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001800
Gunnar V Ljungqvist, Ciara M Weets, Tess Stevens, Hailey Robertson, Ryan Zimmerman, Ellie Graeden, Rebecca Katz
{"title":"Global patterns in access and benefit-sharing: a comprehensive review of national policies.","authors":"Gunnar V Ljungqvist, Ciara M Weets, Tess Stevens, Hailey Robertson, Ryan Zimmerman, Ellie Graeden, Rebecca Katz","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of access and benefit-sharing (ABS) in global health governance is to ensure that countries that provide access to genetic resources, including pathogens, receive equitable access to the benefits derived from their use. The increasing digitalisation of health data has brought this issue to the forefront of discussions on global health security and health equity. While originally conceptualised in supranational agreements, implementation of these treaties requires national-level legislation in each country. This descriptive analysis represents to our knowledge the first open-access comprehensive effort to map ABS policies in all 193 United Nations member states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a standardised review of the legislation for 193 United Nations Member States across three global legal databases (ABS Clearing House, WIPOLEX and FAOLEX), national legal databases and a systematic Google search. Legally enforceable policies were identified, and data were extracted across the following eight aspects of ABS legislation: Scope of Legislation, Digital Sequence Information (DSI), Access to Resources, Prior Informed Consent, Contractual Terms, Benefit-Sharing, Compliance and Legal Sanctions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 104 countries have legally enforceable policies on ABS, with 92 countries having ABS policies relevant to microorganisms. Of these, 74 countries have chosen to restrict access to their domestic pathogens, and 53 have chosen to link access to pathogenic resources with an obligation to share benefits. Altogether 22 countries have a codified position on DSI with regard to ABS in legally enforceable policy: 16 have explicitly included it, 2 have explicitly excluded it and 4 have ambiguous wording. WHO regional coverage of ABS policy on genetic resources ranged from 28% (3/11) of countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region to 57% (21/35) in the Region of the Americas. Likewise, regional coverage of legally enforceable ABS policy related to DSI ranged from 0% in the Eastern Mediterranean and European Regions to 36% (4/11) of countries in the Southeast Asian Region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the heterogeneity found in the global policy landscape as it pertains to ABS, and provide data to inform future agreements and research efforts related to ABS.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001800"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Introduction: The goal of access and benefit-sharing (ABS) in global health governance is to ensure that countries that provide access to genetic resources, including pathogens, receive equitable access to the benefits derived from their use. The increasing digitalisation of health data has brought this issue to the forefront of discussions on global health security and health equity. While originally conceptualised in supranational agreements, implementation of these treaties requires national-level legislation in each country. This descriptive analysis represents to our knowledge the first open-access comprehensive effort to map ABS policies in all 193 United Nations member states.

Methods: We conducted a standardised review of the legislation for 193 United Nations Member States across three global legal databases (ABS Clearing House, WIPOLEX and FAOLEX), national legal databases and a systematic Google search. Legally enforceable policies were identified, and data were extracted across the following eight aspects of ABS legislation: Scope of Legislation, Digital Sequence Information (DSI), Access to Resources, Prior Informed Consent, Contractual Terms, Benefit-Sharing, Compliance and Legal Sanctions.

Results: We found that 104 countries have legally enforceable policies on ABS, with 92 countries having ABS policies relevant to microorganisms. Of these, 74 countries have chosen to restrict access to their domestic pathogens, and 53 have chosen to link access to pathogenic resources with an obligation to share benefits. Altogether 22 countries have a codified position on DSI with regard to ABS in legally enforceable policy: 16 have explicitly included it, 2 have explicitly excluded it and 4 have ambiguous wording. WHO regional coverage of ABS policy on genetic resources ranged from 28% (3/11) of countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region to 57% (21/35) in the Region of the Americas. Likewise, regional coverage of legally enforceable ABS policy related to DSI ranged from 0% in the Eastern Mediterranean and European Regions to 36% (4/11) of countries in the Southeast Asian Region.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the heterogeneity found in the global policy landscape as it pertains to ABS, and provide data to inform future agreements and research efforts related to ABS.

获取和惠益分享的全球模式:对国家政策的全面审查。
摘要:导言:全球卫生治理中获取和惠益分享(ABS)的目标是确保提供遗传资源(包括病原体)获取途径的国家公平获得其使用所产生的惠益。卫生数据的日益数字化使这一问题成为全球卫生安全和卫生公平讨论的前沿问题。虽然这些条约最初是在超国家协定中概念化的,但实施这些条约需要每个国家在国家一级立法。据我们所知,这一描述性分析是首次对193个联合国成员国的ABS政策进行开放获取的全面研究。方法:我们通过三个全球法律数据库(ABS Clearing House、WIPOLEX和FAOLEX)、国家法律数据库和系统的谷歌检索对193个联合国成员国的立法进行了标准化审查。确定了法律上可执行的政策,并提取了ABS立法的以下八个方面的数据:立法范围、数字序列信息(DSI)、资源获取、事先知情同意、合同条款、利益分享、合规和法律制裁。结果:我们发现104个国家对ABS有法律强制执行的政策,其中92个国家有与微生物相关的ABS政策。其中,74个国家选择限制获取其国内病原体,53个国家选择将获取病原体资源与分享利益的义务联系起来。总共有22个国家在法律上可执行的政策中对ABS的DSI有明文规定:16个国家明确包括它,2个国家明确排除它,4个国家措辞含糊。世卫组织遗传资源统计局政策的区域覆盖率从东地中海区域国家的28%(3/11)到美洲区域国家的57%(21/35)不等。同样,与DSI相关的可依法执行的ABS政策的区域覆盖率从东地中海和欧洲区域的0%到东南亚区域的36%(4/11)不等。结论:这些发现突出了与ABS相关的全球政策格局的异质性,并为未来与ABS相关的协议和研究工作提供了数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信