To What Extent are Alberta Nursing Homes and Supportive Living Facilities Integrated with Their Community? A Sequential Quantitative-Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Michelle C Gao, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg
{"title":"To What Extent are Alberta Nursing Homes and Supportive Living Facilities Integrated with Their Community? A Sequential Quantitative-Qualitative Study.","authors":"Michelle C Gao, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing homes and supportive living facilities (continuing care homes [CCH]) are often regarded as separate from their communities. Although occasional studies highlight volunteering or intergenerational activities, there is little systematic evaluation of the existence of activities in CCH that may promote community integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study Design: The study utilized a sequential quantitative-qualitative approach: cross-sectional survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Setting: All registered long-term care (nursing home) and supportive living facilities (Levels 3, 4, and 4 Dementia) within Alberta. Subjects: The survey and interviews were conducted with directors of care. The survey was distributed to 334 facilities. Data saturation in the interviews was reached with seven participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 responses were received; 116 were analyzable (34.7% response rate). The range of activities varied widely. Prior to Covid-19, the most common were spiritual activities entering CCH (96.5%) and volunteers entering CCH (93.0%); CCH rarely had activities such as child daycare (5.2%). 12.9% of spiritual activities entering CCH had not been restarted following the pandemic, but homes were planning to restart this activity (16) or start it as a new activity (1). There was no statistically significant relationship between any activity and facility owner-operator model, size, type, or geography (urban/rural) at any survey time category. Four themes emerged from the interviews: resident quality of life and well-being, home's capacity and openness, sources of support, and planning and programming for implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study addresses a knowledge gap regarding community integration in CCH and provides insight on the types of community-integrated activities occurring in Alberta's CCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.28.783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing homes and supportive living facilities (continuing care homes [CCH]) are often regarded as separate from their communities. Although occasional studies highlight volunteering or intergenerational activities, there is little systematic evaluation of the existence of activities in CCH that may promote community integration.

Methods: Study Design: The study utilized a sequential quantitative-qualitative approach: cross-sectional survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Setting: All registered long-term care (nursing home) and supportive living facilities (Levels 3, 4, and 4 Dementia) within Alberta. Subjects: The survey and interviews were conducted with directors of care. The survey was distributed to 334 facilities. Data saturation in the interviews was reached with seven participants.

Results: 140 responses were received; 116 were analyzable (34.7% response rate). The range of activities varied widely. Prior to Covid-19, the most common were spiritual activities entering CCH (96.5%) and volunteers entering CCH (93.0%); CCH rarely had activities such as child daycare (5.2%). 12.9% of spiritual activities entering CCH had not been restarted following the pandemic, but homes were planning to restart this activity (16) or start it as a new activity (1). There was no statistically significant relationship between any activity and facility owner-operator model, size, type, or geography (urban/rural) at any survey time category. Four themes emerged from the interviews: resident quality of life and well-being, home's capacity and openness, sources of support, and planning and programming for implementation.

Conclusions: This study addresses a knowledge gap regarding community integration in CCH and provides insight on the types of community-integrated activities occurring in Alberta's CCH.

艾伯塔省养老院和支持性生活设施与社区的融合程度如何?序贯定量定性研究。
背景:养老院和支持性生活设施(持续护理院[CCH])通常被视为与社区分开。虽然偶尔有研究强调志愿服务或代际活动,但很少有系统的评估在CCH中存在可能促进社区融合的活动。方法:研究设计:本研究采用连续定量-定性方法:横断面调查后采用半结构化访谈。环境:艾伯塔省所有注册的长期护理(养老院)和支持性生活设施(3、4和4级痴呆症)。调查对象:与护理主任进行调查和访谈。调查结果分发给334个设施。在7个参与者的访谈中达到了数据饱和。结果:共收到回复140份;116例可分析,有效率34.7%。活动的范围差别很大。新冠肺炎疫情前,进入CCH最常见的是精神活动(96.5%)和志愿者(93.0%);CCH很少有儿童日托等活动(5.2%)。12.9%进入CCH的精神活动在大流行后没有重新启动,但家庭计划重新启动该活动(16)或将其作为新活动开始(1)。在任何调查时间类别中,任何活动与设施所有者-经营者模式、规模、类型或地理(城市/农村)之间没有统计学上的显著关系。采访中出现了四个主题:居民的生活质量和福祉,家庭的能力和开放性,支持的来源,以及实施的规划和规划。结论:本研究解决了关于社区卫生保健社区整合的知识差距,并提供了阿尔伯塔省社区卫生保健社区整合活动类型的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信