The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Deniz Cetin-Sahin, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Susan E Bronskill, Dallas Seitz, Debra G Morgan, Laura C Maclagan, Nadia Sourial, Jacqueline Quail, Andrea Gruneir, Machelle Wilchesky, Louis Rochette, Victoria Kubuta Massamba, Erik Youngson, Christina Diong, Eric E Smith, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Mélanie Le Berre, Colleen J Maxwell, Julie Kosteniuk, Delphine Bosson-Rieutort, Ting Wang, Kori Miskucza, Isabelle Vedel
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada.","authors":"Deniz Cetin-Sahin, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Susan E Bronskill, Dallas Seitz, Debra G Morgan, Laura C Maclagan, Nadia Sourial, Jacqueline Quail, Andrea Gruneir, Machelle Wilchesky, Louis Rochette, Victoria Kubuta Massamba, Erik Youngson, Christina Diong, Eric E Smith, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Mélanie Le Berre, Colleen J Maxwell, Julie Kosteniuk, Delphine Bosson-Rieutort, Ting Wang, Kori Miskucza, Isabelle Vedel","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on persons living with dementia (PLWD) were mostly conducted in a single jurisdiction or focused on a limited number of outcomes. Our study estimates the impact of the first two pandemic waves on emergency department (ED) visits (all-cause/ambulatory care sensitive conditions), hospitalizations (all-cause/30-day readmissions), and all-cause mortality in four Canadian jurisdictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using administrative databases from Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Quebec, we assembled two closed retrospective cohorts (2019/pre-pandemic control and 2020/pandemic) of PLWD aged 65+. Within community and nursing home settings, the rates of the above-mentioned outcomes in three pandemic periods (first wave, interim period, second wave) were compared to the corresponding pre-pandemic periods. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the provincial incident rate ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts included 167,095 vs. 173,240 (community) and 93,374 vs. 92,434 (nursing home) individuals, respectively. During the first wave, community and nursing home populations experienced significant declines in the rates of all-cause ED visits (36% vs. 40%) and hospitalizations (25% vs. 22%), which persisted in the following periods in the community. These declines were greater for the rates of ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits and 30-day readmissions. Mortality was 36% higher in nursing homes (first wave) and 13% higher in the community (second wave).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is key to prepare for future health crises and ensure that PLWD receive necessary care and services and do not have such a high mortality rate. Attention should be equally given to PLWD living in their homes and nursing homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"16-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.28.776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on persons living with dementia (PLWD) were mostly conducted in a single jurisdiction or focused on a limited number of outcomes. Our study estimates the impact of the first two pandemic waves on emergency department (ED) visits (all-cause/ambulatory care sensitive conditions), hospitalizations (all-cause/30-day readmissions), and all-cause mortality in four Canadian jurisdictions.

Methods: Using administrative databases from Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Quebec, we assembled two closed retrospective cohorts (2019/pre-pandemic control and 2020/pandemic) of PLWD aged 65+. Within community and nursing home settings, the rates of the above-mentioned outcomes in three pandemic periods (first wave, interim period, second wave) were compared to the corresponding pre-pandemic periods. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the provincial incident rate ratios.

Results: Pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts included 167,095 vs. 173,240 (community) and 93,374 vs. 92,434 (nursing home) individuals, respectively. During the first wave, community and nursing home populations experienced significant declines in the rates of all-cause ED visits (36% vs. 40%) and hospitalizations (25% vs. 22%), which persisted in the following periods in the community. These declines were greater for the rates of ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits and 30-day readmissions. Mortality was 36% higher in nursing homes (first wave) and 13% higher in the community (second wave).

Conclusions: It is key to prepare for future health crises and ensure that PLWD receive necessary care and services and do not have such a high mortality rate. Attention should be equally given to PLWD living in their homes and nursing homes.

COVID-19大流行与痴呆症:加拿大前两波大流行对急性医疗保健利用和死亡率影响的多司法管辖区荟萃分析
背景:以往关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对痴呆症患者(PLWD)影响的研究大多是在单一辖区进行的,或者只关注有限数量的结果。我们的研究估计了前两波大流行对加拿大四个司法管辖区急诊科(ED)就诊(全因/门诊护理敏感情况)、住院(全因/30天再入院)和全因死亡率的影响。方法:利用艾伯塔省、安大略省、萨斯喀彻温省和魁北克省的行政数据库,我们收集了两个65岁以上PLWD的封闭回顾性队列(2019年/大流行前控制和2020年/大流行)。在社区和养老院环境中,将三个大流行时期(第一波、过渡时期、第二波)上述结果的发生率与相应的大流行前时期进行了比较。我们对各省事故率比率进行了随机效应荟萃分析。结果:大流行前和大流行队列分别包括167,095人对173,240人(社区)和93,374人对92,434人(养老院)。在第一波浪潮中,社区和养老院人口经历了全因急诊科就诊率(36%对40%)和住院率(25%对22%)的显著下降,这种情况在社区的后续时期持续存在。这些下降对于门诊护理敏感条件急诊科就诊率和30天再入院率更大。养老院(第一波)的死亡率高出36%,社区(第二波)的死亡率高出13%。结论:关键是要为未来的健康危机做好准备,确保PLWD得到必要的护理和服务,避免如此高的死亡率。对住在家中和疗养院的残疾人士应给予同等的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信