Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Lone Hvidman, Rikke Bek Helmig, Sidsel Boie, Anna Højkjær Larsen, Maria Lundbo, Jeanette Ziska, Stina Lou
{"title":"Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark.","authors":"Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Lone Hvidman, Rikke Bek Helmig, Sidsel Boie, Anna Højkjær Larsen, Maria Lundbo, Jeanette Ziska, Stina Lou","doi":"10.1111/birt.12912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing frequency of induction of labor (IOL) prompts explorations into women's experiences. To inform individualized obstetric care, this study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish pregnant women who underwent out-patient medical IOL and were not in active labor 48 h after IOL initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative interview study with 28 women who had experienced prolonged IOL (all indications). The women were recruited at two obstetric departments approximately 48 h after IOL initiation and telephone interviewed 2-6 weeks after birth (average of 37 min duration). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first theme describes the underlying rationale in the women's description of IOL and birth: 'Motivated by the birth of a healthy baby.' The results show how the women accepted medical indications for IOL, found comfort in the out-patient regimen, and felt secure about the health of their baby, even if the prolonged IOL was frustrating. The results show how 'progress' became a primary motivator for suggesting and accepting interventions. The second theme describes four 'Situations of discouragement' that are clusters of events during IOL and birth that could challenge the women's expectations and boundaries, for example, experiencing excessive pain or not feeling heard. Despite challenges, most women viewed their experiences positively, remaining open to future IOL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings underscore the complexity of women's experiences during IOL and birth, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to navigate diverse, individual preferences while prioritizing maternal and fetal well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing frequency of induction of labor (IOL) prompts explorations into women's experiences. To inform individualized obstetric care, this study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish pregnant women who underwent out-patient medical IOL and were not in active labor 48 h after IOL initiation.

Methods: A qualitative interview study with 28 women who had experienced prolonged IOL (all indications). The women were recruited at two obstetric departments approximately 48 h after IOL initiation and telephone interviewed 2-6 weeks after birth (average of 37 min duration). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The first theme describes the underlying rationale in the women's description of IOL and birth: 'Motivated by the birth of a healthy baby.' The results show how the women accepted medical indications for IOL, found comfort in the out-patient regimen, and felt secure about the health of their baby, even if the prolonged IOL was frustrating. The results show how 'progress' became a primary motivator for suggesting and accepting interventions. The second theme describes four 'Situations of discouragement' that are clusters of events during IOL and birth that could challenge the women's expectations and boundaries, for example, experiencing excessive pain or not feeling heard. Despite challenges, most women viewed their experiences positively, remaining open to future IOL.

Discussion: The findings underscore the complexity of women's experiences during IOL and birth, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to navigate diverse, individual preferences while prioritizing maternal and fetal well-being.

丹麦长期引产后妇女引产经验的定性研究
背景:人工引产(IOL)的频率越来越高,促使人们对妇女的经验进行探索。为了为个性化产科护理提供信息,本研究旨在调查接受门诊药物人工晶状体植入术后48小时未主动分娩的丹麦孕妇的经历。方法:对28例(全部指征)长期人工晶状体植入术的妇女进行定性访谈研究。这些妇女在IOL启动后约48小时在两个产科部门招募,并在出生后2-6周进行电话访谈(平均持续时间37分钟)。访谈被记录、转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。结果:第一个主题描述了妇女对人工晶状体和生育的描述的基本原理:“健康婴儿的出生激励”。结果显示,这些妇女接受了人工晶体的医学指征,在门诊治疗方案中感到舒适,并对婴儿的健康感到安全,即使长期的人工晶体治疗令人沮丧。结果表明,“进步”如何成为建议和接受干预措施的主要动机。第二个主题描述了四种“沮丧的情况”,即在人工晶状体植入和分娩期间发生的一系列事件,可能会挑战女性的期望和界限,例如,经历过度疼痛或感觉没有被倾听。尽管面临挑战,但大多数女性都积极看待自己的经历,对未来的人工晶状体植入持开放态度。讨论:研究结果强调了女性在人工晶状体和分娩过程中经历的复杂性,强调了医疗保健专业人员在优先考虑母体和胎儿健康的同时,需要导航多样化的个人偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信