Withdrawal of life sustaining therapies for awake patients in critical care: The benefits of a collaborative intensivist & palliative care approach.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437251324054
Stuart Edwardson, Rhona Kellichan, Colette Reid, Rosaleen Baruah, Charlie Hall
{"title":"Withdrawal of life sustaining therapies for awake patients in critical care: The benefits of a collaborative intensivist & palliative care approach.","authors":"Stuart Edwardson, Rhona Kellichan, Colette Reid, Rosaleen Baruah, Charlie Hall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251324054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Around 13% of patients admitted to critical care in Europe die in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In the United Kingdom, 15%-20% of patients admitted to critical care do not survive to discharge. Of those that die in ICU, 80% do so following an active decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WLST). With the increasingly aged and co-morbid critical care population entering the ICU, there is an ongoing need for timely, considered discussions both when initiating life sustaining therapies, and also for effective, sensitive communication and management when it comes to withdrawing. In the case of WLST, very little data exists reflecting the proportion of scenarios involving an 'awake' patient with capacity to take part in this decision. It is, however, generally thought to be a small proportion. Most intensivists will therefore have less experience in this process, which perhaps is more representative of the work of our palliative care colleagues. We aim to discuss the most common scenarios in which WLST may occur in the awake and capacitous patient in critical care, the challenges to providing this, and some practical advice on how to perform it well, including the benefits of early interdisciplinary collaboration alongside palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251324054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 13% of patients admitted to critical care in Europe die in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In the United Kingdom, 15%-20% of patients admitted to critical care do not survive to discharge. Of those that die in ICU, 80% do so following an active decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WLST). With the increasingly aged and co-morbid critical care population entering the ICU, there is an ongoing need for timely, considered discussions both when initiating life sustaining therapies, and also for effective, sensitive communication and management when it comes to withdrawing. In the case of WLST, very little data exists reflecting the proportion of scenarios involving an 'awake' patient with capacity to take part in this decision. It is, however, generally thought to be a small proportion. Most intensivists will therefore have less experience in this process, which perhaps is more representative of the work of our palliative care colleagues. We aim to discuss the most common scenarios in which WLST may occur in the awake and capacitous patient in critical care, the challenges to providing this, and some practical advice on how to perform it well, including the benefits of early interdisciplinary collaboration alongside palliative care.

危重监护清醒患者的生命维持治疗的退出:一个合作的强化和姑息治疗方法的好处。
在欧洲,接受重症监护的患者中约有13%死于重症监护病房(ICU)。在英国,15%-20%接受重症监护的患者无法存活到出院。在ICU中死亡的患者中,80%是在积极决定退出维持生命治疗(WLST)后死亡的。随着越来越多的老年和共病重症监护人群进入ICU,在开始维持生命的治疗时,以及在退出治疗时进行有效、敏感的沟通和管理,都需要及时、经过深思熟虑的讨论。在WLST的情况下,很少有数据反映了涉及“清醒”患者有能力参与这一决定的情况的比例。然而,人们普遍认为这是一个很小的比例。因此,大多数重症医师在这一过程中经验较少,这可能更能代表我们姑息治疗同事的工作。我们的目标是讨论在重症监护中清醒和有能力的患者中发生WLST的最常见情况,提供这种情况的挑战,以及如何更好地执行它的一些实用建议,包括早期跨学科合作与姑息治疗的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信