Stuart Edwardson, Rhona Kellichan, Colette Reid, Rosaleen Baruah, Charlie Hall
{"title":"Withdrawal of life sustaining therapies for awake patients in critical care: The benefits of a collaborative intensivist & palliative care approach.","authors":"Stuart Edwardson, Rhona Kellichan, Colette Reid, Rosaleen Baruah, Charlie Hall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251324054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Around 13% of patients admitted to critical care in Europe die in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In the United Kingdom, 15%-20% of patients admitted to critical care do not survive to discharge. Of those that die in ICU, 80% do so following an active decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WLST). With the increasingly aged and co-morbid critical care population entering the ICU, there is an ongoing need for timely, considered discussions both when initiating life sustaining therapies, and also for effective, sensitive communication and management when it comes to withdrawing. In the case of WLST, very little data exists reflecting the proportion of scenarios involving an 'awake' patient with capacity to take part in this decision. It is, however, generally thought to be a small proportion. Most intensivists will therefore have less experience in this process, which perhaps is more representative of the work of our palliative care colleagues. We aim to discuss the most common scenarios in which WLST may occur in the awake and capacitous patient in critical care, the challenges to providing this, and some practical advice on how to perform it well, including the benefits of early interdisciplinary collaboration alongside palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251324054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251324054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Around 13% of patients admitted to critical care in Europe die in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In the United Kingdom, 15%-20% of patients admitted to critical care do not survive to discharge. Of those that die in ICU, 80% do so following an active decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WLST). With the increasingly aged and co-morbid critical care population entering the ICU, there is an ongoing need for timely, considered discussions both when initiating life sustaining therapies, and also for effective, sensitive communication and management when it comes to withdrawing. In the case of WLST, very little data exists reflecting the proportion of scenarios involving an 'awake' patient with capacity to take part in this decision. It is, however, generally thought to be a small proportion. Most intensivists will therefore have less experience in this process, which perhaps is more representative of the work of our palliative care colleagues. We aim to discuss the most common scenarios in which WLST may occur in the awake and capacitous patient in critical care, the challenges to providing this, and some practical advice on how to perform it well, including the benefits of early interdisciplinary collaboration alongside palliative care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.