Early Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Chunliang Guo, Tao Ding, Jianqing Zheng, Xiule Fang, Zhiyun Feng, Yuntao Xue
{"title":"Early Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chunliang Guo, Tao Ding, Jianqing Zheng, Xiule Fang, Zhiyun Feng, Yuntao Xue","doi":"10.14444/8725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) is gaining attention as a minimally invasive procedure for treating spinal stenosis. However, comprehensive studies on its outcomes remain limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the changes in radiologic parameters and clinical outcomes associated with endoscopic ULBD for treating spinal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 53 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent endoscopic ULBD decompression surgery. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were collected to assess the impact on activities of daily living. Parameters such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volumes (first and second day), total hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Additionally, pre- and postoperative imaging changes were documented, and MacNab functional scores were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively to assess clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No nerve injuries occurred during the operation. Two cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage were successfully treated with pressure dressings, and no postoperative complications such as incision infection or dehiscence were observed. At 6-month follow-up, postoperative visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index showed significant improvement compared with preoperative levels (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperative lumbar computed tomography images revealed a statistically significant enlargement in the anterior-posterior diameter of the spinal canal and the diameter of the bilateral lateral recesses (<i>P</i> < 0.05). All patients experienced either improvement or resolution of clinical symptoms. The MacNab functional scores at the 6-month follow-up indicated excellent outcomes in 37 cases, good in 15 cases, and fair in 1 case, resulting in an overall good rate of 98.11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that endoscopic ULBD can provide favorable outcomes for single-segment central lumbar spinal stenosis under local anesthesia at a relatively low cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) is gaining attention as a minimally invasive procedure for treating spinal stenosis. However, comprehensive studies on its outcomes remain limited.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the changes in radiologic parameters and clinical outcomes associated with endoscopic ULBD for treating spinal stenosis.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 53 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent endoscopic ULBD decompression surgery. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were collected to assess the impact on activities of daily living. Parameters such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volumes (first and second day), total hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Additionally, pre- and postoperative imaging changes were documented, and MacNab functional scores were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively to assess clinical efficacy.

Results: No nerve injuries occurred during the operation. Two cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage were successfully treated with pressure dressings, and no postoperative complications such as incision infection or dehiscence were observed. At 6-month follow-up, postoperative visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index showed significant improvement compared with preoperative levels (P < 0.05). Postoperative lumbar computed tomography images revealed a statistically significant enlargement in the anterior-posterior diameter of the spinal canal and the diameter of the bilateral lateral recesses (P < 0.05). All patients experienced either improvement or resolution of clinical symptoms. The MacNab functional scores at the 6-month follow-up indicated excellent outcomes in 37 cases, good in 15 cases, and fair in 1 case, resulting in an overall good rate of 98.11%.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that endoscopic ULBD can provide favorable outcomes for single-segment central lumbar spinal stenosis under local anesthesia at a relatively low cost.

内窥镜单侧椎板切除术双侧减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的早期临床和放射学评估:回顾性研究。
背景:内窥镜单侧椎板切除术双侧减压(ULBD)作为一种治疗椎管狭窄的微创手术正受到越来越多的关注。然而,对其结果的全面研究仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在评估内镜下ULBD治疗椎管狭窄的放射学参数和临床结果的变化。方法:对53例中枢性腰椎管狭窄患者行内镜下ULBD减压手术进行回顾性研究。收集术前和术后视觉模拟量表和Oswestry残疾指数评分来评估对日常生活活动的影响。记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后第1、2天引流量、总住院时间、术后住院时间等参数。此外,记录术前和术后影像学变化,并在术后6个月评估MacNab功能评分,以评估临床疗效。结果:术中无神经损伤。2例脑脊液漏经加压敷料成功治疗,术后无切口感染、裂开等并发症发生。随访6个月,术后视觉模拟量表评分和Oswestry残疾指数较术前有显著改善(P < 0.05)。术后腰椎ct图像显示椎管前后径及双侧侧窝直径增大,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有患者的临床症状均有所改善或缓解。随访6个月的MacNab功能评分显示,37例预后极好,15例良好,1例一般,总体优良率为98.11%。结论:本研究表明,在局麻下,内镜下ULBD治疗单节段中央腰椎管狭窄具有较好的疗效,且成本相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信