[How can we support medical residents and lateral entrants into general practice during the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting? A qualitative interview study].

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Maria Farquharson, Ida Lotter, Martin Fink, Armin Wunder
{"title":"[How can we support medical residents and lateral entrants into general practice during the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting? A qualitative interview study].","authors":"Maria Farquharson, Ida Lotter, Martin Fink, Armin Wunder","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of specialist training and lateral entry into general practice (GP), the transition from inpatient to outpatient work can be associated with challenges and uncertainty. In view of the GP shortages, it is particularly important to promote both the entry into primary care and the quality of postgraduate training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a qualitative interview study, 15 lateral entrants into GP and resident doctors (\"residents\") were asked about challenges and needs, and the results were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lateral entrants and residents are characterized by their hospital-oriented approach. In addition, lateral entrants have to (re-)familiarize themselves with being a doctor in training. The heavy workload is a key challenge for residents. Different structures and requirements of the inpatient and outpatient setting are challenging for both groups. Both groups see a need for support in areas such as adapted specialist knowledge, GP vocabulary and outpatient work processes, and they benefit from educational programs in heterogeneous groups including both lateral entrants and doctors in training in the outpatient setting, e.g., through networking.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The common needs identified provide information for educational program planning. Irrespective of heterogeneous life circumstances, joint support programs can be both useful and resource-sparing, as existing programs are often suitable for covering the identified needs. The qualitative findings of this study provide insight into the (professional) biographical context of the interviewees and should be quantitatively verified in further research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to facilitate the transition from inpatient to outpatient care for both lateral entrants and residents, existing seminar and mentoring programs of the Competence Centers for Postgraduate Education can meet, with a few minor adjustments, the needs of both groups. However, it is important to find unique ways to address these groups and to identify and remove barriers to participation at an organizational level.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of specialist training and lateral entry into general practice (GP), the transition from inpatient to outpatient work can be associated with challenges and uncertainty. In view of the GP shortages, it is particularly important to promote both the entry into primary care and the quality of postgraduate training.

Methods: In a qualitative interview study, 15 lateral entrants into GP and resident doctors ("residents") were asked about challenges and needs, and the results were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Lateral entrants and residents are characterized by their hospital-oriented approach. In addition, lateral entrants have to (re-)familiarize themselves with being a doctor in training. The heavy workload is a key challenge for residents. Different structures and requirements of the inpatient and outpatient setting are challenging for both groups. Both groups see a need for support in areas such as adapted specialist knowledge, GP vocabulary and outpatient work processes, and they benefit from educational programs in heterogeneous groups including both lateral entrants and doctors in training in the outpatient setting, e.g., through networking.

Discussion: The common needs identified provide information for educational program planning. Irrespective of heterogeneous life circumstances, joint support programs can be both useful and resource-sparing, as existing programs are often suitable for covering the identified needs. The qualitative findings of this study provide insight into the (professional) biographical context of the interviewees and should be quantitatively verified in further research.

Conclusion: In order to facilitate the transition from inpatient to outpatient care for both lateral entrants and residents, existing seminar and mentoring programs of the Competence Centers for Postgraduate Education can meet, with a few minor adjustments, the needs of both groups. However, it is important to find unique ways to address these groups and to identify and remove barriers to participation at an organizational level.

[在从住院病人向门诊病人过渡的过程中,我们如何为医学住院医师和全科医生提供支持?定性访谈研究]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信