Yooseok Chae , Giles Michael Cheers , MinJoo Kim , Paul Reidler , Alexander Klein , Thomas Fevens , Boris Michael Holzapfel , Susanne Mayer-Wagner
{"title":"MRI as a viable alternative to CT for 3D surgical planning of cavitary bone tumors","authors":"Yooseok Chae , Giles Michael Cheers , MinJoo Kim , Paul Reidler , Alexander Klein , Thomas Fevens , Boris Michael Holzapfel , Susanne Mayer-Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cavitary bone defects, defined as a volumetric loss of native bone tissue, require accurate preoperative imaging for treatment planning. While CT (computed tomography) has traditionally been the gold standard for segmentation due to its superior resolution of cortical bone, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) offers unique advantages, particularly in visualizing the soft tissue–bone interface. Furthermore, MRI eliminates the ionizing radiation associated with CT, making it an advantageous alternative, especially in the management of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Despite these advantages, MRI's inherently lower spatial resolution may introduce artifacts, which can complicate segmentation accuracy. This study evaluates the feasibility of MRI as a viable alternative to CT in the preoperative planning of cavitary bone defect treatment. We analyzed CT and MRI scans from 80 patients with benign and locally aggressive primary bone tumors, generating three-dimensional (3D) models through manual segmentation in Mimics, validated using Geomagic Control X. Volumetric differences between the CT- and MRI-derived models were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired <em>t</em>-test. The mean volumetric difference between MRI and CT scans was 2.68 ± 1.44 %, which was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.15). Additionally, multiple regression analysis examining sex, age, and diagnosis revealed no significant differences in the 3D model volumes derived from the two imaging modalities (sex: <em>p</em> = 0.51, age: <em>p</em> = 0.98, and diagnosis: <em>p</em> = 0.50). These results support MRI-based segmentation as a reliable, radiation-free alternative to CT, particularly when precise delineation of soft tissue boundaries is critical for surgical planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 110369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25000530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cavitary bone defects, defined as a volumetric loss of native bone tissue, require accurate preoperative imaging for treatment planning. While CT (computed tomography) has traditionally been the gold standard for segmentation due to its superior resolution of cortical bone, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) offers unique advantages, particularly in visualizing the soft tissue–bone interface. Furthermore, MRI eliminates the ionizing radiation associated with CT, making it an advantageous alternative, especially in the management of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Despite these advantages, MRI's inherently lower spatial resolution may introduce artifacts, which can complicate segmentation accuracy. This study evaluates the feasibility of MRI as a viable alternative to CT in the preoperative planning of cavitary bone defect treatment. We analyzed CT and MRI scans from 80 patients with benign and locally aggressive primary bone tumors, generating three-dimensional (3D) models through manual segmentation in Mimics, validated using Geomagic Control X. Volumetric differences between the CT- and MRI-derived models were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. The mean volumetric difference between MRI and CT scans was 2.68 ± 1.44 %, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Additionally, multiple regression analysis examining sex, age, and diagnosis revealed no significant differences in the 3D model volumes derived from the two imaging modalities (sex: p = 0.51, age: p = 0.98, and diagnosis: p = 0.50). These results support MRI-based segmentation as a reliable, radiation-free alternative to CT, particularly when precise delineation of soft tissue boundaries is critical for surgical planning.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.