Dose-related efficacy and safety of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Na Wang, Zeyuan Fan
{"title":"Dose-related efficacy and safety of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Na Wang, Zeyuan Fan","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06631-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unstable angina pectoris (UAP), a prevalent form of angina pectoris, is caused by coronary artery stenosis, elevated blood viscosity, and atheromatous plaque that blocks blood vessels. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various injectable doses of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate (STS) for UAP treatment.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using STS until December 29<sup>th</sup>, 2023. The selection of studies solely focused on conventional Western medicine (WM) and different STS dosages (40, 50, 60, or 80 mg/day) combined with WM. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) was used to develop the random-effects or fixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The study included 31 RCTs. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with WM alone, combination of WM and STS at 40 mg/day (RR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.29]; P=0.027) or 60 mg/day (RR: 1.20 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.30]; P=0.0005) increased electrocardiographic efficacy. Compared with WM alone, 40 mg/day of STS plus WM reduced plasma viscosity (SMD: -0.78 [95% CI: -1.60, 0.04]; P=0.056); whole blood low viscosity (SMD: -0.58 [95% CI: -0.95, -0.21]; P=0.015); CRP (SMD: -1.07 [95% CI: -2.10, -0.03]; P=0.047); and adverse events (SMD: -1.62 [95% CI: -3.55, 0.31]; P=0.069). In addition to 40 mg of STS, we found that 60 mg of STS plus WM reduced the incidence of adverse events (SMD: -1.01 [95% CI: -2.07, 0.04]; P=0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis indicated that the combination of STS on 40 mg/day with WM enhanced the safety and clinical efficacy of UAP therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06631-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unstable angina pectoris (UAP), a prevalent form of angina pectoris, is caused by coronary artery stenosis, elevated blood viscosity, and atheromatous plaque that blocks blood vessels. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various injectable doses of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate (STS) for UAP treatment.

Evidence acquisition: The Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using STS until December 29th, 2023. The selection of studies solely focused on conventional Western medicine (WM) and different STS dosages (40, 50, 60, or 80 mg/day) combined with WM. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) was used to develop the random-effects or fixed-effects model.

Evidence synthesis: The study included 31 RCTs. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with WM alone, combination of WM and STS at 40 mg/day (RR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.29]; P=0.027) or 60 mg/day (RR: 1.20 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.30]; P=0.0005) increased electrocardiographic efficacy. Compared with WM alone, 40 mg/day of STS plus WM reduced plasma viscosity (SMD: -0.78 [95% CI: -1.60, 0.04]; P=0.056); whole blood low viscosity (SMD: -0.58 [95% CI: -0.95, -0.21]; P=0.015); CRP (SMD: -1.07 [95% CI: -2.10, -0.03]; P=0.047); and adverse events (SMD: -1.62 [95% CI: -3.55, 0.31]; P=0.069). In addition to 40 mg of STS, we found that 60 mg of STS plus WM reduced the incidence of adverse events (SMD: -1.01 [95% CI: -2.07, 0.04]; P=0.055).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that the combination of STS on 40 mg/day with WM enhanced the safety and clinical efficacy of UAP therapy.

丹参酮ⅱA磺酸钠治疗不稳定型心绞痛的剂量相关疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析
简介:不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)是一种常见的心绞痛形式,由冠状动脉狭窄、血液粘度升高和动脉粥样硬化斑块阻塞血管引起。采用荟萃分析评价不同注射剂量丹参酮II A磺酸钠(STS)治疗UAP的疗效和安全性。证据获取:截至2023年12月29日,检索Web of Science、CNKI、万方、VIP、CBM、PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库中使用STS的随机对照试验(RCTs)。选择的研究仅集中在传统西药(WM)和不同剂量的STS(40、50、60或80毫克/天)与WM联合进行。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估偏倚风险。采用标准化平均差(SMD)或风险比(RR)建立随机效应或固定效应模型。证据综合:本研究纳入31项随机对照试验。meta分析结果显示,与单用WM相比,WM联合STS治疗40 mg/d (RR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.29];P=0.027)或60 mg/d (RR: 1.20 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.30];P=0.0005)提高心电图疗效。与单用WM相比,40 mg/天STS加WM可降低血浆粘度(SMD: -0.78 [95% CI: -1.60, 0.04];P = 0.056);全血低粘度(SMD: -0.58 [95% CI: -0.95, -0.21];P = 0.015);CRP (smd: -1.07 [95% ci: -2.10, -0.03];P = 0.047);不良事件(SMD: -1.62 [95% CI: -3.55, 0.31];P = 0.069)。除了40 mg STS外,我们发现60 mg STS加WM降低了不良事件的发生率(SMD: -1.01 [95% CI: -2.07, 0.04];P = 0.055)。结论:本荟萃分析表明,40 mg/天的STS联合WM可提高UAP治疗的安全性和临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信