Induced Pseudomembrane Enrichment in Long Nerve Allograft Reconstruction.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/mus.28362
Omar A Protzuk, Mariam A Samuel, Kriston R Seward, Christopher A Keshishian, Geetanjali S Bendale, Jonathan E Isaacs
{"title":"Induced Pseudomembrane Enrichment in Long Nerve Allograft Reconstruction.","authors":"Omar A Protzuk, Mariam A Samuel, Kriston R Seward, Christopher A Keshishian, Geetanjali S Bendale, Jonathan E Isaacs","doi":"10.1002/mus.28362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Long nerve defects are typically reconstructed with autograft or processed acellular nerve allograft (PNA). PNA is convenient and avoids donor morbidity but lacks the neurotrophic environment of autograft. Increased levels of neurotrophic factors have been identified in pseudomembranes induced around silicone implanted between nerve ends. This study aimed to determine if pseudomembrane can be reliably induced around silicone implanted between nerve ends, and if this enhances regeneration of PNA inset within using a staged technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lewis rats (n = 24) underwent resection of a 15-mm sciatic nerve. The defect was filled with a silicone tube (n = 12) (MA) or the nerve ends were secured to a muscle bed (n = 12) (NMA). After 4 weeks, the silicone was replaced with PNA threaded within the pseudomembrane tunnel. In both groups, PNA was used to reconstruct the nerve defect. Weekly neuromotor assessment was performed with sciatic function index (SFI). At 16 weeks, muscle recovery was assessed, and nerve samples were obtained for histomorphometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MA group's average normalized muscle weight was 46.25% versus the NMA group's 33.19% (p < 0.05). The MA group's average normalized muscle girth was 78.25% versus the NMA group's 60.73% (p < 0.05). Axon counts, g-ratio, and muscle force were not statistically different. At Week 15, the MA group had a significantly higher average SFI: -82.25 versus the NMA group -95.03 (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PNA inset within induced pseudomembrane sheath enhanced muscle reinnervation. A staged membrane enhancement technique may be effective for improving PNA efficacy in peripheral nerve injury reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":"71 4","pages":"662-669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Long nerve defects are typically reconstructed with autograft or processed acellular nerve allograft (PNA). PNA is convenient and avoids donor morbidity but lacks the neurotrophic environment of autograft. Increased levels of neurotrophic factors have been identified in pseudomembranes induced around silicone implanted between nerve ends. This study aimed to determine if pseudomembrane can be reliably induced around silicone implanted between nerve ends, and if this enhances regeneration of PNA inset within using a staged technique.

Methods: Lewis rats (n = 24) underwent resection of a 15-mm sciatic nerve. The defect was filled with a silicone tube (n = 12) (MA) or the nerve ends were secured to a muscle bed (n = 12) (NMA). After 4 weeks, the silicone was replaced with PNA threaded within the pseudomembrane tunnel. In both groups, PNA was used to reconstruct the nerve defect. Weekly neuromotor assessment was performed with sciatic function index (SFI). At 16 weeks, muscle recovery was assessed, and nerve samples were obtained for histomorphometry.

Results: The MA group's average normalized muscle weight was 46.25% versus the NMA group's 33.19% (p < 0.05). The MA group's average normalized muscle girth was 78.25% versus the NMA group's 60.73% (p < 0.05). Axon counts, g-ratio, and muscle force were not statistically different. At Week 15, the MA group had a significantly higher average SFI: -82.25 versus the NMA group -95.03 (p < 0.05).

Discussion: PNA inset within induced pseudomembrane sheath enhanced muscle reinnervation. A staged membrane enhancement technique may be effective for improving PNA efficacy in peripheral nerve injury reconstruction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信