High failure rates in comminuted patella fractures (AO/OTA 34-C3) fixed with an isolated new patella specific 2.7 mm variable angle locking plate.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Wayne Hoskins, Rown Parola, Charles Gusho, Jaime L Bellamy, Abdulai Bangura, Gregory Della Rocca, Kyle Schweser, Steven DeFroda, Brett Crist, Douglas Haase
{"title":"High failure rates in comminuted patella fractures (AO/OTA 34-C3) fixed with an isolated new patella specific 2.7 mm variable angle locking plate.","authors":"Wayne Hoskins, Rown Parola, Charles Gusho, Jaime L Bellamy, Abdulai Bangura, Gregory Della Rocca, Kyle Schweser, Steven DeFroda, Brett Crist, Douglas Haase","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the outcomes of comminuted patella fractures fixed with a new patella-specific 2.7mm variable angle (VA) locking plate in isolation versus when augmentation of fracture fixation is applied with the plate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design:Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All acute comminuted patella fractures (AO/OTA 34-C3; complete displaced or undisplaced articular, frontal/coronal multifragmentary fractures) in adult patients primarily treated with a new patella-specific 2.7 mm VA locking plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA) between January 2021 and February 2024 at a single academic center were reviewed and divided in those fixed with the patella plate alone and those with additional bony and/or soft tissue augmentation. Excluded were those with < 90 follow-up, set a priori, unless complications occurred <90 days.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Comparison of patient age, sex, BMI, ASA, FRAX score, open fracture, polytrauma involvement, length of follow-up and post-operative protocols was made between groups. The primary outcome measure was loss of fixation. Secondary outcomes were mode of failure and other surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 38 included patients, with no lack of or loss of follow-up, with 20 grouped into patella plate alone, and 18 into patella plate plus augmentation. The plate only group had a higher mean age (63.7 vs. 46.9, p=0.024), with no between-group differences in sex (65% vs. 44% female, p=0.20), BMI (p=0.51), 10-year fracture risk (FRAX) (p=0.06), open fractures (p=0.30), polytrauma involvement (p=0.97), or postoperative weight-bearing (p=0.76) or range of motion (p=0.06) protocols. There were eight failures (40.0%) in the plate-only group, and two failures in the plate with augmentation group (11.1%); (p=0.043). When controlling for known risk factors for osteoporosis and poor bone quality using the FRAX 10-year fracture risk on multivariable regression analysis, plate fixation with fracture augmentation was associated with a lower risk of fixation failure (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.75; p=0.036). The plate-only group failed by loss of distal (62.5%, n=5) and proximal fixation (37.5%, n=3). Each of the two failures in the plate plus augmentation group had loss of distal fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of comminuted patella fractures with a new patella-specific 2.7mm VA locking plate has a high failure rate when used in isolation. Augmenting fracture fixation with soft-tissue repair and/or independent fracture fragment fixation may significantly decrease failure rates. In particular, augmentation of the tendon avulsion component to restore the extensor mechanism appears critical.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of comminuted patella fractures fixed with a new patella-specific 2.7mm variable angle (VA) locking plate in isolation versus when augmentation of fracture fixation is applied with the plate.

Methods: Design:Retrospective.

Setting: Academic Level I Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: All acute comminuted patella fractures (AO/OTA 34-C3; complete displaced or undisplaced articular, frontal/coronal multifragmentary fractures) in adult patients primarily treated with a new patella-specific 2.7 mm VA locking plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA) between January 2021 and February 2024 at a single academic center were reviewed and divided in those fixed with the patella plate alone and those with additional bony and/or soft tissue augmentation. Excluded were those with < 90 follow-up, set a priori, unless complications occurred <90 days.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Comparison of patient age, sex, BMI, ASA, FRAX score, open fracture, polytrauma involvement, length of follow-up and post-operative protocols was made between groups. The primary outcome measure was loss of fixation. Secondary outcomes were mode of failure and other surgical complications.

Results: There were a total of 38 included patients, with no lack of or loss of follow-up, with 20 grouped into patella plate alone, and 18 into patella plate plus augmentation. The plate only group had a higher mean age (63.7 vs. 46.9, p=0.024), with no between-group differences in sex (65% vs. 44% female, p=0.20), BMI (p=0.51), 10-year fracture risk (FRAX) (p=0.06), open fractures (p=0.30), polytrauma involvement (p=0.97), or postoperative weight-bearing (p=0.76) or range of motion (p=0.06) protocols. There were eight failures (40.0%) in the plate-only group, and two failures in the plate with augmentation group (11.1%); (p=0.043). When controlling for known risk factors for osteoporosis and poor bone quality using the FRAX 10-year fracture risk on multivariable regression analysis, plate fixation with fracture augmentation was associated with a lower risk of fixation failure (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.75; p=0.036). The plate-only group failed by loss of distal (62.5%, n=5) and proximal fixation (37.5%, n=3). Each of the two failures in the plate plus augmentation group had loss of distal fixation.

Conclusions: Treatment of comminuted patella fractures with a new patella-specific 2.7mm VA locking plate has a high failure rate when used in isolation. Augmenting fracture fixation with soft-tissue repair and/or independent fracture fragment fixation may significantly decrease failure rates. In particular, augmentation of the tendon avulsion component to restore the extensor mechanism appears critical.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level 3.

粉碎性髌骨骨折(AO/OTA 34-C3)用分离的新型髌骨专用2.7 mm可变角度锁定钢板固定失败率高。
目的:比较新型髌骨专用2.7mm可变角度(VA)锁定钢板单独固定与骨折强化钢板固定的效果。方法:设计:回顾。单位:学术一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:所有急性髌骨粉碎性骨折(AO/OTA 34-C3;2021年1月至2024年2月,在一个学术中心,主要接受新型髌骨特异性2.7 mm VA锁定钢板(Synthes, Paoli, PA)治疗的成人患者的完全移位或未移位关节,额/冠状多碎片性骨折进行了回顾,并将其分为仅用髌骨钢板固定的患者和附加骨和/或软组织增强的患者。排除随访时间< 90次的患者,除非发生并发症,否则均为先验设置。结果测量和比较:组间比较患者的年龄、性别、BMI、ASA、FRAX评分、开放性骨折、多处创伤、随访时间和术后方案。主要结局指标为固定丧失。次要结果是失败模式和其他手术并发症。结果:共纳入38例患者,均无随访缺失或缺失,其中单独髌骨钢板组20例,髌骨钢板加增强组18例。单纯钢板组患者的平均年龄更高(63.7 vs 46.9, p=0.024),在性别(65% vs 44%女性,p=0.20)、BMI (p=0.51)、10年骨折风险(FRAX) (p=0.06)、开放性骨折(p=0.30)、多发创伤(p=0.97)、术后负重(p=0.76)或活动范围(p=0.06)方面没有组间差异。单纯钢板组失败8例(40.0%),加钢板组失败2例(11.1%);(p = 0.043)。当使用FRAX 10年骨折风险进行多变量回归分析,控制骨质疏松症和骨质量差的已知危险因素时,骨折增强钢板固定与较低的固定失败风险相关(OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.75;p = 0.036)。仅钢板组因远端固定丢失(62.5%,n=5)和近端固定丢失(37.5%,n=3)而失败。钢板加增强组的两例失败均导致远端固定丧失。结论:新型髌骨专用2.7mm VA锁定钢板单独使用治疗粉碎性髌骨骨折失败率高。增强骨折固定与软组织修复和/或独立骨折碎片固定可以显著降低失败率。特别是,肌腱撕脱成分的增强以恢复伸肌机制显得至关重要。证据水平:治疗性3级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信